![MoU proves Taxpayer’s Active Role in Managing EOU: CESTAT upholds Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/2067975-mou-proves-taxpayers-active-role-in-managing-eou-taxpayers-active-role-in-managing-eou-taxscan.webp "MoU proves Taxpayer’s Active Role in Managing EOU: CESTAT upholds Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]")
MoU proves Taxpayer’s Active Role in Managing EOU: CESTAT upholds Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and related...
![Cash Vans Provided with Drivers fall under Supply of Tangible Goods Service, not Deemed Sale/Transportation: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/2067978-cash-vans-taxscan.webp "Cash Vans Provided with Drivers fall under Supply of Tangible Goods Service, not Deemed Sale/Transportation: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Allows Refund of Amounts Paid Under Mistake, Even Beyond One-Year Limitation Period [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/2067944-refund-amount-allahabad-cestat-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Allows Refund of Amounts Paid Under Mistake, Even Beyond One-Year Limitation Period [Read Order]")
![Splitting Invoices for Furniture and Building Rent Should Not Deny Legitimate Refund When Service Tax is Properly Paid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/18/2065041-splitting-invoices-invoices-splitting-invoices-for-furniture-and-building-rent-furniture-and-building-rent-taxscan.webp "Splitting Invoices for Furniture and Building Rent Should Not Deny Legitimate Refund When Service Tax is Properly Paid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Exported Goods Misdeclared as “Natural Abrasive Grain” Instead of Restricted “Natural Garnet”: CESTAT upholds DGFT Policy Violation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/18/2065021-exported-goods-misdeclared-exported-goods-exported-goods-misdeclared-as-natural-abrasive-grain-taxscan.webp "Exported Goods Misdeclared as “Natural Abrasive Grain” Instead of Restricted “Natural Garnet”: CESTAT upholds DGFT Policy Violation [Read Order]")
Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer to Be Classified as ‘Polymers of Styrene’, Not Synthetic Rubber: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer (SBC) should be classified under “Polymers of Styrene” and not under...
![Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer to Be Classified as ‘Polymers of Styrene’, Not Synthetic Rubber: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/2062847-cestat-polymers-styrene-taxscan.webp "Styrene-Butadiene Copolymer to Be Classified as ‘Polymers of Styrene’, Not Synthetic Rubber: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Classification of Offshore Services as Export or Taxable Business Support Services: CESTAT Remands Matter to Commissioner [Read Order]
The tribunal observed that the Commissioner had relied on a post-SCN period agreement and noted the assessee’s willingness to produce the appropriate agreement for the relevant time frame. The...
![Classification of Offshore Services as Export or Taxable Business Support Services: CESTAT Remands Matter to Commissioner [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/08/2061551-business-support-service.webp "Classification of Offshore Services as Export or Taxable Business Support Services: CESTAT Remands Matter to Commissioner [Read Order]")
![Penalty on Co noticee is invalid when main case is settled under SVLDRS: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/2059100-cestat-cestat-ahmedabad-under-svldrs-svldrs-penalty-on-co-noticee-co-noticee-noticee-case-main-noticee-case-customs-taxscan.webp "Penalty on Co noticee is invalid when main case is settled under SVLDRS: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand Citing Backdated Agreement as Suppression; Limits Second SCN to Normal Period [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs,Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)upheld the service tax demand citing backdated agreement as suppression, but limited the second show cause notice to ...
![CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand Citing Backdated Agreement as Suppression; Limits Second SCN to Normal Period [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/25/2054248-service-tax-demand-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand Citing Backdated Agreement as Suppression; Limits Second SCN to Normal Period [Read Order]")
Extended Limitation Not Applicable in Matter Involving Legal Interpretation: CESTAT Allows Appeal as Demand Time-Barred [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Customs,Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) held that the extended limitation period was not applicable in a case involving legal interpretation and allowed ...
![Extended Limitation Not Applicable in Matter Involving Legal Interpretation: CESTAT Allows Appeal as Demand Time-Barred [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/25/2054235-legal-interpretation-cestat-taxscan.webp "Extended Limitation Not Applicable in Matter Involving Legal Interpretation: CESTAT Allows Appeal as Demand Time-Barred [Read Order]")
![No Service Tax on Fabrication of Windmill Parts Covered Under Excise Exemption: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/24/2053664-cestat-ahmadabad-no-service-tax-windmill-excise-exemption-taxscan.webp "No Service Tax on Fabrication of Windmill Parts Covered Under Excise Exemption: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Win for Shipping Line: CESTAT Rules SCMTR Does Not Require Waiver of Detention Charges Beyond 60 Days [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that shipping lines are required to waive detention charges only for up to 60 days under the Sea Cargo...
![Win for Shipping Line: CESTAT Rules SCMTR Does Not Require Waiver of Detention Charges Beyond 60 Days [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/2050442-central-excise-valuation-independent-seller-cestat-taxscan.webp "Win for Shipping Line: CESTAT Rules SCMTR Does Not Require Waiver of Detention Charges Beyond 60 Days [Read Order]")