![No Denial of CENVAT Credit w/o Cogent Evidence of Paper Transactions: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand and Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/cenvat-cenvat-credit-cenvat-news-cenvat-credit-news-Cogent-Evidence-cestat-cestat-news-cestat-kolkata-cestat-kolkata-news-excise-duty-excise-duty-news-penalty-demand-taxscan.jpg "No Denial of CENVAT Credit w/o Cogent Evidence of Paper Transactions: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand and Penalty [Read Order]")
No Denial of CENVAT Credit w/o Cogent Evidence of Paper Transactions: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand and Penalty [Read Order]
The two member bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, quashed the excise duty demand and penalty, stating...
![No time limit prescribed u/s 27 for refund of Customs Penalty and Redemption Fine: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/cestat-cestat-news-cestat-allahabad-cestat-allahabad-news-section-27-of-cestat-cestat-section-27-penalty-redemption-fine-taxnews-section-27-of-customs-act-customs-act-customs-act-news-taxscan.jpg "No time limit prescribed u/s 27 for refund of Customs Penalty and Redemption Fine: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CENVAT Credit availed instead of Refund and Utilised for Paying Excise Duty: CESTAT sets aside Recovery Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Paying-Excise-Duty-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-CENVAT-credit-Allahabad-Bench-Recovery-Order-taxscan.jpeg "CENVAT Credit availed instead of Refund and Utilised for Paying Excise Duty: CESTAT sets aside Recovery Order [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Not Payable on TDS paid by Indian Company on behalf of Foreign Service Provider: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/CESTAT-Service-Tax-Customs-Excise-Custom-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Service Tax Not Payable on TDS paid by Indian Company on behalf of Foreign Service Provider: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Imported Aerosol valves components are classifiable under first schedule to CTA : CESTAT sets aside order [Read Order]
The two-member bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, ruled that imported aerosol valve components are classifiable under tariff heading 8481 8090 of the...
![Imported Aerosol valves components are classifiable under first schedule to CTA : CESTAT sets aside order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Aerosol-valves-cestat-cta-cestat-news-customs-tax-news-exise-tax-news-service-tax-news-service-tax-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal.jpg "Imported Aerosol valves components are classifiable under first schedule to CTA : CESTAT sets aside order [Read Order]")
![CESTAT rules Payment made under Protest is Excise Duty u/s 11B, Not Deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/CESTAT-Excise-Duty-CESTATChennai-Central-Excise-Act-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Section-11B-of-the-Central-Excise-Act-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT rules Payment made under Protest is Excise Duty u/s 11B, Not Deposit [Read Order]")
Failure to File Claim during Insolvency Proceedings u/s 31 and 32A of IBC: Gujarat HC Abates Income Tax Appeals [Read Order]
The Gujarat High Court abated income tax appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) due to the failure to file a claim during insolvency proceedings. The appeals arose from an order...
![Failure to File Claim during Insolvency Proceedings u/s 31 and 32A of IBC: Gujarat HC Abates Income Tax Appeals [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Insolvency-Proceedings-IBC-Gujarat-HC-Income-Tax-Appeals-taxscan.jpg "Failure to File Claim during Insolvency Proceedings u/s 31 and 32A of IBC: Gujarat HC Abates Income Tax Appeals [Read Order]")
GTA Services received in Place of Removal Falls under Definition of Input Service under Rule 2(1) of CCR: Himachal Pradesh HC sets aside CESTAT Order [Read Order]
The Himachal Pradesh High Court has set aside the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) order, stating that Goods Transport Agency ( GTA ) services received in the place of...
![GTA Services received in Place of Removal Falls under Definition of Input Service under Rule 2(1) of CCR: Himachal Pradesh HC sets aside CESTAT Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/GTA-GTA-Services-Cenvat-Credit-Rule-Himachal-Pradesh-High-Court-Cenvat-Credit-Rule-taxscan.jpg "GTA Services received in Place of Removal Falls under Definition of Input Service under Rule 2(1) of CCR: Himachal Pradesh HC sets aside CESTAT Order [Read Order]")
Madras HC directs Fresh Appeal to CESTAT after Denial of Cross-Examination of Customs Auditors in Areca Nut Case [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court rejected the request of petitioner to cross examine the Customs Auditors with regards to the reclassification of its products into ‘Areca Nuts Split’. The...
![Madras HC directs Fresh Appeal to CESTAT after Denial of Cross-Examination of Customs Auditors in Areca Nut Case [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Madras-high-court-CESTAT-Areca-Nut-Case-Cross-Examination-of-Customs-Auditors-taxscan.jpeg "Madras HC directs Fresh Appeal to CESTAT after Denial of Cross-Examination of Customs Auditors in Areca Nut Case [Read Order]")