![Insufficiency in Medical Evidence for Condonation of 2727-Day Delay in CESTAT Appeal: Madras HC dismisses Petition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Medical-Evidence-for-Condonation-delay-CESTAT-Madras-High-Court-writ-petition-taxscan.jpg "Insufficiency in Medical Evidence for Condonation of 2727-Day Delay in CESTAT Appeal: Madras HC dismisses Petition [Read Order]")
Insufficiency in Medical Evidence for Condonation of 2727-Day Delay in CESTAT Appeal: Madras HC dismisses Petition [Read Order]
The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed against the CESTAT ( Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ) appeal filed on...
![Customs Duty Element Less than Threshold Limit: Delhi HC dismisses Appeal for Low Tax Effect [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Delhi-High-Court-Delhi-HC-Customs-duty-Delhi-HC-dismiss-appeals-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Customs Duty Element Less than Threshold Limit: Delhi HC dismisses Appeal for Low Tax Effect [Read Judgment]")
![Absence of Evidence of Taxpayer’s Authorisation as Customs Broker u/s 146 of Customs Act: CESTAT reduces Penalty to Rs. 25,000 /- [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Taxpayers-Authorisation-CESTAT-Customs-Act-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Absence of Evidence of Taxpayer’s Authorisation as Customs Broker u/s 146 of Customs Act: CESTAT reduces Penalty to Rs. 25,000 /- [Read Order]")
![CESTAT upholds Excise Duty Demand on Scraps, made within 5 years from Date of Knowledge [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CESTAT-Excise-Duty-Excise-Duty-Demand-on-Scraps-Scraps-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT upholds Excise Duty Demand on Scraps, made within 5 years from Date of Knowledge [Read Order]")
CESTAT not Committed any Error in Law or Fact w.r.t. Demand of Differential Customs Duty: SC Dismisses Appeal [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal filed by the customs department, affirming that the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) did not commit any error in law or fact...
![CESTAT not Committed any Error in Law or Fact w.r.t. Demand of Differential Customs Duty: SC Dismisses Appeal [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CESTAT-Supreme-Court-Customs-Duty-Customs-duty-demand-Tax-news-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT not Committed any Error in Law or Fact w.r.t. Demand of Differential Customs Duty: SC Dismisses Appeal [Read Judgement]")
Appeal against ₹2 Crore Excise Duty Demand: Meghalaya HC dismisses Appeal Directing to Approach Supreme Court u/s 35L of Central Excise Act [Read Order]
The Meghalaya High Court dismissed the department's appeal and held that the appeal relating to the value of service does not lie to the High Court under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944....
Confiscation Fine under Excise Rules Reduces on Lack of Evidence on Excess SSI Exemption Limit: Supreme Court List Matter on Miscellaneous Day [Read Judgement]
In a recent case where the special leave petition ( SLP ) was filed against the Custom Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) order, the Supreme Court listed the matter on a miscellaneous...
![Confiscation Fine under Excise Rules Reduces on Lack of Evidence on Excess SSI Exemption Limit: Supreme Court List Matter on Miscellaneous Day [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Supreme-Court-CESTAT-Confiscation-Fine-under-Excise-Rules-Excess-SSI-Exemption-Limit-Taxscan.jpg "Confiscation Fine under Excise Rules Reduces on Lack of Evidence on Excess SSI Exemption Limit: Supreme Court List Matter on Miscellaneous Day [Read Judgement]")
Self Assessment cannot be modified during Refund Proceedings: CESTAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) while dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant held that self assessment could not be modified during refund...
![Self Assessment cannot be modified during Refund Proceedings: CESTAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Witness-Central-Excise-Authorities-Cross-Examination-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Self Assessment cannot be modified during Refund Proceedings: CESTAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]")
CESTAT upholds Penalty levied on misdeclaration of goods in order to avail ineligible drawback [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) upheld the penalty levied on the misdeclaration of goods in order to avail ineligible drawback. The Appellant...
![CESTAT upholds Penalty levied on misdeclaration of goods in order to avail ineligible drawback [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CESTAT-CESTAT-upholds-Penalty-ineligible-drawback-CESTAT-updates-Customs-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT upholds Penalty levied on misdeclaration of goods in order to avail ineligible drawback [Read Order]")
Non-Supervision of Activities of Staff amounts to Non-Exercise of Due Diligence u/s 10(e) of CBLR: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) held that the non-supervision of activities of staff amounts to non-exercise of due diligence under Section 10(e) of the Customs...
![Non-Supervision of Activities of Staff amounts to Non-Exercise of Due Diligence u/s 10(e) of CBLR: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CESTAT-Staff-activities-supervision-CBLR-CESTAT-diligence-section-10-TAXSC.png "Non-Supervision of Activities of Staff amounts to Non-Exercise of Due Diligence u/s 10(e) of CBLR: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court Condones Delay of GST Department, Issues Notice to Schindler India [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Supreme-Court-Condones-Delay-GST-Department-Notice-Schindler-India-taxscan.jpg "Supreme Court Condones Delay of GST Department, Issues Notice to Schindler India [Read Judgement]")