Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![The responsibility to demonstrate Intentional Misuse of Tax Credit Provisions lies with the Excise Department: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Customs-Excise-service-tax-appellate-tribunal-Excise-Department-TAXSCAN.jpg "The responsibility to demonstrate Intentional Misuse of Tax Credit Provisions lies with the Excise Department: CESTAT [Read Order]")
The responsibility to demonstrate Intentional Misuse of Tax Credit Provisions lies with the Excise Department: CESTAT [Read Order]
A single member bench of CESTAT set aside the order against assesse on the ground that there was no grounds for initiating proceeding against the...
![CESTAT Annual Case Digest [Part-17]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CESTAT-Annual-Digest-2023-Part-17.jpg "CESTAT Annual Case Digest [Part-17]")
![CESTAT Annual Case Digest [Part-16]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CESTAT-Annual-Case-Digest-Part-16-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "CESTAT Annual Case Digest [Part-16]")
![CESTAT Annual Case Digest [Part-15]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CESTAT-Annual-Case-Digest-Part-15-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT Annual Case Digest [Part-15]")
No Evidence to show that relationship between parties has influenced price: CESTAT quashes differential Duty Demand
The Hyderabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed differential duty demand as there was no evidence to show that relationship between parties has...
Penalty u/s 114 A of Customs Act, Person Liable to Duty would be Liable to Penalty Equal to Duty: CESTAT rules in Favour of IBM [Read Order]
In the case of IBM India Pvt Ltd, the Bangalore bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT) has held that Penalty under section 114 A of the Customs Act, 1962 would be...
![Penalty u/s 114 A of Customs Act, Person Liable to Duty would be Liable to Penalty Equal to Duty: CESTAT rules in Favour of IBM [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/CESTAT-IBM-Customs-Act-Customs-Excise-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty u/s 114 A of Customs Act, Person Liable to Duty would be Liable to Penalty Equal to Duty: CESTAT rules in Favour of IBM [Read Order]")
Automatic Voltage Regulators classifiable under Electrical Transformers, Static Convertors, attracts 20% Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), ruled that Automatic Voltage Regulators classifiable under Electrical Transformers, Static Convertors and it...
![Automatic Voltage Regulators classifiable under Electrical Transformers, Static Convertors, attracts 20% Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/site-img-27.jpg "Automatic Voltage Regulators classifiable under Electrical Transformers, Static Convertors, attracts 20% Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]")