Transaction of Purchase and Sale of Liquor by Rajasthan Beverages Corporation Ltd Will Not Fall Within Ambit of BAS , Not Taxable: Supreme Court [Read Order]
The Supreme Court has held that transaction of purchase and sale of liquor by Rajasthan Beverages Corporation Ltd will not fall within ambit of...
![Anti-Dumping Duty Imposed Based on Lapsed Excise Notification: Bombay HC Directs to Appeal Before CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Anti-Dumping-Duty-Lapsed-Excise-Notification-Bombay-High-Court-Appeal-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Anti-Dumping Duty Imposed Based on Lapsed Excise Notification: Bombay HC Directs to Appeal Before CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No bar on taking CENVAT credit of Service Tax Accumulated for period when the Premises was not Registered: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/CENVAT-credit-of-Service-Tax-Accumulated-for-period-Registered-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No bar on taking CENVAT credit of Service Tax Accumulated for period when the Premises was not Registered: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Nexus Aspect cannot be Questioned while dealing with Refund Applications filed u/r 5 of CCR: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the nexus aspect cannot be questioned while dealing with the refund application filed under rule 5 of the...
![Nexus Aspect cannot be Questioned while dealing with Refund Applications filed u/r 5 of CCR: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Nexus-Aspect-cannot-be-Questioned-Refund-Applications-filed-CCR-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Nexus Aspect cannot be Questioned while dealing with Refund Applications filed u/r 5 of CCR: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Grant of refund benefit not subjected to compliance of provisions of Rule 2(l) of CCR: CESTAT Allows Service Tax Refund Claim [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the service tax refund claim and held that the grant of refund benefit was not subjected to the compliance...
![Grant of refund benefit not subjected to compliance of provisions of Rule 2(l) of CCR: CESTAT Allows Service Tax Refund Claim [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Grant-of-refund-subjected-to-compliance-CCR-CESTAT-Service-Tax-Refund-Claim-TAXSCAN.jpg "Grant of refund benefit not subjected to compliance of provisions of Rule 2(l) of CCR: CESTAT Allows Service Tax Refund Claim [Read Order]")
Recovery of CENVAT credit of Excise Duty availed on common input services attributable to exempted activity of trading: CESTAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) directed re-adjudication for recovery of CENVAT credit of excise duty availed on the common input services...
![Recovery of CENVAT credit of Excise Duty availed on common input services attributable to exempted activity of trading: CESTAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/CENVAT-credit-Excise-Duty-Customs-CESTAT-Directs-Re-adjudication-TAXSCAN.jpg "Recovery of CENVAT credit of Excise Duty availed on common input services attributable to exempted activity of trading: CESTAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]")
Relief to Suzuki Motors: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty of Appox. 1.3 crores on After Sales Service Charge on ground of PDI exemption [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) granted relief to Suzuki Motors by quashing the excise duty demand on after-sale services charges on the...
![Relief to Suzuki Motors: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty of Appox. 1.3 crores on After Sales Service Charge on ground of PDI exemption [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/site-image-suzuki-1.jpg "Relief to Suzuki Motors: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty of Appox. 1.3 crores on After Sales Service Charge on ground of PDI exemption [Read Order]")
Setback to Crompton Greaves: CESTAT rules transformers constitute ‘Inputs’ in terms of Rule 2(k) of CCR [Read Order]
In a setback to Crompton Greaves Ltd, the Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), ruled that the transformers constitute ‘inputs’ in terms of rule 2(k) of the...
![Setback to Crompton Greaves: CESTAT rules transformers constitute ‘Inputs’ in terms of Rule 2(k) of CCR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Crompton-Greaves-CESTAT-rules-Transformers-constitute-CESTAT-CCR-TAXSCAN.jpg "Setback to Crompton Greaves: CESTAT rules transformers constitute ‘Inputs’ in terms of Rule 2(k) of CCR [Read Order]")
Failure of CB to act in Proactive manner in fulfilment of obligation under sub-regulation 11(a) of CBLR: CESTAT upholds Forfeiture of Security Deposit [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) upheld the forfeiture of security deposit on the ground of failure of customs broker (CB) to act in proactive...
![Failure of CB to act in Proactive manner in fulfilment of obligation under sub-regulation 11(a) of CBLR: CESTAT upholds Forfeiture of Security Deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/CESTAT-CBLR-Failure-of-CB-to-act-in-Proactive-Manner-Security-Deposit-Customs-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure of CB to act in Proactive manner in fulfilment of obligation under sub-regulation 11(a) of CBLR: CESTAT upholds Forfeiture of Security Deposit [Read Order]")