Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Cogent Evidence is needed to establish a Charge against Clandestine Removal, No Penalty sustained under Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Cogent-evidence-penalty-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Cogent Evidence is needed to establish a Charge against Clandestine Removal, No Penalty sustained under Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Cogent Evidence is needed to establish a Charge against Clandestine Removal, No Penalty sustained under Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that cogent evidence is needed to establish a charge...
![Third Party Records cannot form the Basis of Clandestine Removal, unless Corroborated by Independent Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Third-Party-Clandestine-Removal-Independent-Evidence-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Third Party Records cannot form the Basis of Clandestine Removal, unless Corroborated by Independent Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Allahabad HC refuses to grant Bail to person alleged of Clandestine Removal of Finished Goods without issuance of any Invoice, without Payment of any applicable duties [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Allahabad-High-court-grant-bail-to-person-clandestine-removal-finished-goods-invoice-applicable-duties-Taxscan.jpg "Allahabad HC refuses to grant Bail to person alleged of Clandestine Removal of Finished Goods without issuance of any Invoice, without Payment of any applicable duties [Read Order]")
![Burden of Proof for alleged Clandestine Removal of Goods is upon the Department: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Clandestine-Removal-CESTAT-Taxscan-1.jpeg "Burden of Proof for alleged Clandestine Removal of Goods is upon the Department: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Third-Party documents alone not sufficient to prove charge of Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Clandestine-Removal-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Third-Party documents alone not sufficient to prove charge of Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CESTAT frees M/S Shree rolling mill from Charge of Clandestine removal for want of Cogent evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CESTAT-MS-Shree-rolling-mill-clandestine-removal-cogent-evidence-taxscan.jpeg "CESTAT frees M/S Shree rolling mill from Charge of Clandestine removal for want of Cogent evidence [Read Order]")
![Rule 209A of CER, 1944 can be Imposed only when there is Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Clandestine-Removal-Taxscan.jpg "Rule 209A of CER, 1944 can be Imposed only when there is Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Allegation of Clandestine Removal can’t be upheld only on the basis of Mere Entries made in certain Private Record recovered from Security: CESTAT [Read Order]
In the case of M/s, Mohit Engineering versus CCE, the Delhi bench of Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT )Â ruled that allegation of clandestine removal cannot be upheld only...
![Allegation of Clandestine Removal can’t be upheld only on the basis of Mere Entries made in certain Private Record recovered from Security: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Allegation of Clandestine Removal can’t be upheld only on the basis of Mere Entries made in certain Private Record recovered from Security: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Shortages noticed during Stock Verification can’t be basis for Allegation of Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]
Delhi CESTAT while hearing the appeal of M/s G.P. Ispat Pvt. Limited against the CCE&ST, tribunal quashed the demand since the allegation of clandestine removal has been made only on the basis of...
Mere Statements of Director which is Inculpatory in Nature can’t be Ground for Upholding Activities of Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]
While hearing the case of M/s S.R. Ingots Pvt. Ltd, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) held that mere statements of the director which is inculpatory in nature cannot be...