Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Third-Party documents alone not sufficient to prove charge of Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Clandestine-Removal-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Third-Party documents alone not sufficient to prove charge of Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Third-Party documents alone not sufficient to prove charge of Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT), Delhi bench has recently quashed an order confirming the charge of clandestine removal...
![CESTAT frees M/S Shree rolling mill from Charge of Clandestine removal for want of Cogent evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CESTAT-MS-Shree-rolling-mill-clandestine-removal-cogent-evidence-taxscan.jpeg "CESTAT frees M/S Shree rolling mill from Charge of Clandestine removal for want of Cogent evidence [Read Order]")
![Rule 209A of CER, 1944 can be Imposed only when there is Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Clandestine-Removal-Taxscan.jpg "Rule 209A of CER, 1944 can be Imposed only when there is Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Mere Statements of Director which is Inculpatory in Nature can’t be Ground for Upholding Activities of Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]
While hearing the case of M/s S.R. Ingots Pvt. Ltd, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) held that mere statements of the director which is inculpatory in nature cannot be...
![Mere Statements of Director which is Inculpatory in Nature can’t be Ground for Upholding Activities of Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Mere Statements of Director which is Inculpatory in Nature can’t be Ground for Upholding Activities of Clandestine Removal: CESTAT [Read Order]")