Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![7 Gold Bangles Weighing 222 Grams Confiscated, Passenger Claims it belongs to 3 ladies: Delhi HC Allows to Challenge Customs Order [Read Order] 7 Gold Bangles Weighing 222 Grams Confiscated, Passenger Claims it belongs to 3 ladies: Delhi HC Allows to Challenge Customs Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/05/500x300_2110245-7-gold-bangles-passenger-claims-taxscan.webp)
7 Gold Bangles Weighing 222 Grams Confiscated, Passenger Claims it belongs to 3 ladies: Delhi HC Allows to Challenge Customs Order [Read Order]
passengers claimed that it belonged to three ladies. Thus, the court allowed the petitioner to file the appeal of the customs order before the...


![Copolymer vs. Homopolymer: CESTAT Raps Customs for confirming ADD on PVC Import without Verifying Material Composition [Read Order] Copolymer vs. Homopolymer: CESTAT Raps Customs for confirming ADD on PVC Import without Verifying Material Composition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/25/250x150_2107826-copolymer-vs-homopolymer-cestat-raps-customs-confirming-pvc-import-without-verifying-material-composition-taxscan.webp)
![Writ not Maintainable when Statutory Appeal Ignored: Supreme Court in 29 Year Old Customs Case [Read Order] Writ not Maintainable when Statutory Appeal Ignored: Supreme Court in 29 Year Old Customs Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/22/250x150_2107370-writ-statutory-appeal-supreme-court-customs-case-writ-not-maintainable-taxscan.webp)
![Supreme Court to Decide Validity of Customs Duty Exemption Granted to Samsung for LED Display Imports [Read Judgement] Supreme Court to Decide Validity of Customs Duty Exemption Granted to Samsung for LED Display Imports [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/04/250x150_2102165-supreme-court-customs-duty-customs-duty-exemption-samsung-led-display-taxscan.webp)
![Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order] Penalty on Co-Noticee u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Set Aside by CESTAT: Mere Classification Dispute Not Grounds for Confiscation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/31/250x150_2101252-cestat-mumbai-penalty-on-co-noticee-customs-act-taxscan.webp)
![Delhi HC directs Commissioner of Customs to Release Seized Gold [Read Order] Delhi HC directs Commissioner of Customs to Release Seized Gold [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/30/500x300_2101065-seized-gold-taxscan.webp)
![Relevant Date for Export Duty is Date of Let Export Order, Not Loading Date: CESTAT in Bharat Mines Case [Read Order] Relevant Date for Export Duty is Date of Let Export Order, Not Loading Date: CESTAT in Bharat Mines Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/29/500x300_2100809-export-cestat-chennai-bharat-mines-case-taxscan.webp)
![UBS Mark Omission Insufficient to Confiscate Gold: Orissa HC Confirms Lawful Ownership of Gold under Customs Act [Read Order] UBS Mark Omission Insufficient to Confiscate Gold: Orissa HC Confirms Lawful Ownership of Gold under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/29/500x300_2100816-ubs-mark-omission-insufficient-confiscate-gold-orissa-hc-lawful-ownership-gold-customs-act-taxscan.webp)
![Madras HC quashes Customs Order for Violating 90-Day Limitation Under CBLR [Read Order] Madras HC quashes Customs Order for Violating 90-Day Limitation Under CBLR [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/28/500x300_2100446-madras-high-court-under-cblr-customs-order-taxscan.webp)
![Reassessment u/s 28 Valid Despite Finalised Bills of Entry: CESTAT Upholds Duty Demand for Misclassification of Door Handle Parts [Read Order] Reassessment u/s 28 Valid Despite Finalised Bills of Entry: CESTAT Upholds Duty Demand for Misclassification of Door Handle Parts [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/27/500x300_2100180-reassessment-finalised-bills-cestat-duty-demand-door-handle-parts-taxscan.webp)
![CESTAT Classifies “Noil Silk Fabrics” under Natural Silk Fabrics, Rejects Department’s Classification under CTH 5007 1000 [Read Order] CESTAT Classifies “Noil Silk Fabrics” under Natural Silk Fabrics, Rejects Department’s Classification under CTH 5007 1000 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/17/500x300_2097325-cestat-noil-silk-fabrics-natural-silk-fabrics-taxscan.webp)
![CESTAT order Passed after 2 Years from Decision Date: Bombay HC quashes Order on Grounds of Order Delivered Belatedly [Read Order] CESTAT order Passed after 2 Years from Decision Date: Bombay HC quashes Order on Grounds of Order Delivered Belatedly [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/07/500x300_2094633-bombay-high-court-cestat-order-taxscan.webp)