![Export Benefit Cannot be Denied Unilaterally by Customs Authorities: CESTAT Allows Appeal, Notes Legal Infirmity [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/06/2128103-cestat-allows-appeal-notes-legal-infirmity-taxscan.webp "Export Benefit Cannot be Denied Unilaterally by Customs Authorities: CESTAT Allows Appeal, Notes Legal Infirmity [Read Order]")
Export Benefit Cannot be Denied Unilaterally by Customs Authorities: CESTAT Allows Appeal, Notes Legal Infirmity [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai, allowed an appeal and noted legal infirmity, holding that export benefits...
![Customs did not Issue or Produce SCN: CESTAT Rejects Appeal in Larsen & Toubro Misrepresentation Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/26/2127209-customs-scn-cestat-rejects-misrepresentation-case-.webp "Customs did not Issue or Produce SCN: CESTAT Rejects Appeal in Larsen & Toubro Misrepresentation Case [Read Order]")
![Software Preloaded in Imported Hardware Includible in Customs Value: CESTAT Upholds Duty Demand, Drops Penalty against Wipro [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/10/2124470-software-preloaded-imported-hardware-includible-customs-value-cestat.webp "Software Preloaded in Imported Hardware Includible in Customs Value: CESTAT Upholds Duty Demand, Drops Penalty against Wipro [Read Order]")
![Finance Bill, 2026: Proposed Amendments in the Customs Act, 1962 to Extend Validity of Customs Advance Rulings [Read Finance Bill 2026]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/02/2123300-finance-bill-2026-amendments-customs-act-1962-extend-customs-advance-rulings-taxscan.webp "Finance Bill, 2026: Proposed Amendments in the Customs Act, 1962 to Extend Validity of Customs Advance Rulings [Read Finance Bill 2026]")
![Non-Speaking Order Ignoring Advance Authorisation Claim Cannot Stand: Madras HC Sets Aside Customs Confiscation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/29/2122418-non-speaking-order-ignoring-advance-authorisation-claim-cannot-stand-madras-hc.webp "Non-Speaking Order Ignoring Advance Authorisation Claim Cannot Stand: Madras HC Sets Aside Customs Confiscation [Read Order]")
Customs cannot Demand Disproportionate Bank Guarantee for Provisional Release: CESTAT cuts 70% to 30% [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad has modified the bank guarantee amounting to nearly 70% of the value of the goods, and restricted it to 30% of the...
![Customs cannot Demand Disproportionate Bank Guarantee for Provisional Release: CESTAT cuts 70% to 30% [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/28/2122183-customs-cannot-demand-disproportionate-bank-guarantee-taxscan.webp "Customs cannot Demand Disproportionate Bank Guarantee for Provisional Release: CESTAT cuts 70% to 30% [Read Order]")
Interactive Flat Panels classifiable as ADP Machines: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹34.89 Cr Customs Duty Demand [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has set aside a customs duty demand of ₹34.89 crore holding that the imported Interactive Flat Panels (IFP)...
![Interactive Flat Panels classifiable as ADP Machines: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹34.89 Cr Customs Duty Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/26/2121963-interactive-flat-panels-classifiable-adp-machines-cestat-customs-duty-demand-taxscan.webp "Interactive Flat Panels classifiable as ADP Machines: CESTAT Sets Aside ₹34.89 Cr Customs Duty Demand [Read Order]")
![Arm-Blade Assembly without Motor Classified as Parts, Not Complete Wiper: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/19/2120766-arm-blade-assembly-without-motor-classified-as-parts-not-complete-wiper-cestat-taxscan.webp "Arm-Blade Assembly without Motor Classified as Parts, Not Complete Wiper: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Customs Fails to Disclose Method Adopted to Redetermine Confiscated Goods Value: CESTAT Remands Matter for Revaluation [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (“CESTAT”) notes that the customs department has failed to disclose the method adopted to redetermine the value of confiscated imported goods....
![Customs Fails to Disclose Method Adopted to Redetermine Confiscated Goods Value: CESTAT Remands Matter for Revaluation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/17/2120264-customs-fails-disclose-method-adopted-redetermine-confiscated-goods-value-taxscan.webp "Customs Fails to Disclose Method Adopted to Redetermine Confiscated Goods Value: CESTAT Remands Matter for Revaluation [Read Order]")
₹50k is Maximum Penalty under CBLR, Revenue Cannot Seek Higher Penalty in Forged Mate Receipt Case: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2013 stipulate a maximum penalty of ₹50,000, and the Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the...
![₹50k is Maximum Penalty under CBLR, Revenue Cannot Seek Higher Penalty in Forged Mate Receipt Case: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/16/2120111-50k-is-maximum-penalty-under-cblr-revenue-cannot-seek-higher-penalty-in-forged-mate-receipt-case-cestat-taxscan.webp "₹50k is Maximum Penalty under CBLR, Revenue Cannot Seek Higher Penalty in Forged Mate Receipt Case: CESTAT [Read Order]")
