![Old and Worn Clothes Imported Without Valid Specific License: CESTAT Upholds 10% Redemption Fine and 5% Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Kolkata-Import-old-Cloth-penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Old and Worn Clothes Imported Without Valid Specific License: CESTAT Upholds 10% Redemption Fine and 5% Penalty [Read Order]")
Old and Worn Clothes Imported Without Valid Specific License: CESTAT Upholds 10% Redemption Fine and 5% Penalty [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) in Kolkata upheld a 10% redemption fine and a 5% penalty in a...
![Failure to Prove Defacement: CESTAT sets aside Confiscation of 3 out of 10 alleged Foreign-Origin Gold Bars [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-New-delhi-Foreign-Origin-Gold-Bars-gold-bars-seized-Gold-bar-case-taxscan.jpg "Failure to Prove Defacement: CESTAT sets aside Confiscation of 3 out of 10 alleged Foreign-Origin Gold Bars [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Confirms Correct Classification of Imported Brake Pad Materials under CTH 6813, Limits Differential Duty Demand to Normal Period [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Brake-Pad-Materials-site-img.jpg "CESTAT Confirms Correct Classification of Imported Brake Pad Materials under CTH 6813, Limits Differential Duty Demand to Normal Period [Read Order]")
![No forgery/misuse unveiled by DGFT Licensing Authorities: CESTAT quashes Customs Penalty on VABL License Holder [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-Customs-Tax-Excise-Tax-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Taxscan.jpg "No forgery/misuse unveiled by DGFT Licensing Authorities: CESTAT quashes Customs Penalty on VABL License Holder [Read Order]")
![CESTAT sets aside Confiscation under Customs Act in Absence of Evidence for Over-Valuation Of Goods [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Delhi-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Customs-Act-Over-Valuation-Of-Goods-CESTAT-news-under-Rule-8-of-Customs-Valuation-Rules-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT sets aside Confiscation under Customs Act in Absence of Evidence for Over-Valuation Of Goods [Read Order]")
No violation of 10(d) and 10(n) CBLR regulations: CESTAT quashes forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the impugned order and the appellants’ Customs Broker license was restored. In this...
![No violation of 10(d) and 10(n) CBLR regulations: CESTAT quashes forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Mumbai-CBLR-regulations-CBLR-Taxscan.jpg "No violation of 10(d) and 10(n) CBLR regulations: CESTAT quashes forfeiture of security deposit and imposition of penalty [Read Order]")
Delhi HC Rules Petitioner Ineligible for Gold Bar Release Over Non-Response to Timely SCN u/s 110(2) of Customs Act [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court ruled that the petitioner is ineligible for the release of the gold bar due to their failure to respond to a timely Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued under Section 110(2) of the...
![Delhi HC Rules Petitioner Ineligible for Gold Bar Release Over Non-Response to Timely SCN u/s 110(2) of Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/SCN-Customs-Act-Delhi-HC-Delhi-High-Court-Section-1102-of-the-Customs-Act-Petitioner-Delhi-HC-Rules-Taxscan.jpg "Delhi HC Rules Petitioner Ineligible for Gold Bar Release Over Non-Response to Timely SCN u/s 110(2) of Customs Act [Read Order]")
Seized 32MT Betel Nuts Destroyed during Pre-Trial Stage: Meghalaya HC orders Customs Dept to Issue Refund of Rs. 60L [Read Order]
The Meghalaya High Court has ruled that seized goods by the customs cannot be destroyed during the pre-trial stage, directing a refund of Rs. 60 lakhs for 32,000 kg of betel nuts that were destroyed....
‘Saffron’ capable of use as Food Flavour and Colour: CESTAT quashes Confiscation and Duty Demand on alleged Misuse [Read Order]
In a major ruling, the Mumbai bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the confiscation and duty demand on the alleged misuse of 'Saffron' capable of use as...
![‘Saffron’ capable of use as Food Flavour and Colour: CESTAT quashes Confiscation and Duty Demand on alleged Misuse [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/saffron.jpg "‘Saffron’ capable of use as Food Flavour and Colour: CESTAT quashes Confiscation and Duty Demand on alleged Misuse [Read Order]")
Absence of Speaking Order u/s 17 (5) of Customs Act: CESTAT remands Case of Reassessment back to Original Authority [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), citing the absence of a speaking order under Section 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962 has remanded the case of...
![Absence of Speaking Order u/s 17 (5) of Customs Act: CESTAT remands Case of Reassessment back to Original Authority [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Speaking-Order-of-Customs-Act-CESTAT-remands-Case-Reassessment-Original-Authority-taxscan.jpg "Absence of Speaking Order u/s 17 (5) of Customs Act: CESTAT remands Case of Reassessment back to Original Authority [Read Order]")
Royalty not includable in Transaction Value of Imported Raw Materials to demand Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) held that royalty not includable in transaction value of imported raw materials to demand differential customs...
![Royalty not includable in Transaction Value of Imported Raw Materials to demand Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/CESTAT-Customs-excise-service-tax-Raw-Materials-Value-of-raw-materials-TAXSCAN.jpg "Royalty not includable in Transaction Value of Imported Raw Materials to demand Differential Customs Duty: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CESTAT not Committed any Error in Law or Fact w.r.t. Demand of Differential Customs Duty: SC Dismisses Appeal [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal filed by the customs department, affirming that the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) did not commit any error in law or fact...
![CESTAT not Committed any Error in Law or Fact w.r.t. Demand of Differential Customs Duty: SC Dismisses Appeal [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CESTAT-Supreme-Court-Customs-Duty-Customs-duty-demand-Tax-news-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT not Committed any Error in Law or Fact w.r.t. Demand of Differential Customs Duty: SC Dismisses Appeal [Read Judgement]")