![UBS Mark Omission Insufficient to Confiscate Gold: Orissa HC Confirms Lawful Ownership of Gold under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/29/2100816-ubs-mark-omission-insufficient-confiscate-gold-orissa-hc-lawful-ownership-gold-customs-act-taxscan.webp "UBS Mark Omission Insufficient to Confiscate Gold: Orissa HC Confirms Lawful Ownership of Gold under Customs Act [Read Order]")
UBS Mark Omission Insufficient to Confiscate Gold: Orissa HC Confirms Lawful Ownership of Gold under Customs Act [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court held that mere omission of the UBS brand mark in the invoices cannot be a lawful basis for confiscation of gold biscuits under...
![Madras HC quashes Customs Order for Violating 90-Day Limitation Under CBLR [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/28/2100446-madras-high-court-under-cblr-customs-order-taxscan.webp "Madras HC quashes Customs Order for Violating 90-Day Limitation Under CBLR [Read Order]")
![Reassessment u/s 28 Valid Despite Finalised Bills of Entry: CESTAT Upholds Duty Demand for Misclassification of Door Handle Parts [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/27/2100180-reassessment-finalised-bills-cestat-duty-demand-door-handle-parts-taxscan.webp "Reassessment u/s 28 Valid Despite Finalised Bills of Entry: CESTAT Upholds Duty Demand for Misclassification of Door Handle Parts [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Classifies “Noil Silk Fabrics” under Natural Silk Fabrics, Rejects Department’s Classification under CTH 5007 1000 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/17/2097325-cestat-noil-silk-fabrics-natural-silk-fabrics-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Classifies “Noil Silk Fabrics” under Natural Silk Fabrics, Rejects Department’s Classification under CTH 5007 1000 [Read Order]")
![CESTAT order Passed after 2 Years from Decision Date: Bombay HC quashes Order on Grounds of Order Delivered Belatedly [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/07/2094633-bombay-high-court-cestat-order-taxscan.webp "CESTAT order Passed after 2 Years from Decision Date: Bombay HC quashes Order on Grounds of Order Delivered Belatedly [Read Order]")
![12% IGST Applies To All “Diagnostic Kits And Reagents” Under Heading 3822: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/01/2093055-cestat-mumbai-12-igst-applies-taxscan.webp "12% IGST Applies To All “Diagnostic Kits And Reagents” Under Heading 3822: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand on Manpower Supply Services [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/29/2092352-cestat-service-tax-service-tax-demand-manpower-supply-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand on Manpower Supply Services [Read Order]")
Redeployment of Auxiliary Equipment After Project Completion Not a Violation, Circulars Cannot Override Project Import Regulations Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that redeployment of auxiliary equipment after completion of a project does not violate...
![Redeployment of Auxiliary Equipment After Project Completion Not a Violation, Circulars Cannot Override Project Import Regulations Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/27/2091517-auxiliary-equipment-override-project-import-regulations-act-cestat-taxscan.webp "Redeployment of Auxiliary Equipment After Project Completion Not a Violation, Circulars Cannot Override Project Import Regulations Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Customs Inquiry Report Beyond 90 Days under Regulation 17(5) of CBLR is Invalid: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court held that a customs inquiry report issued beyond the 90-day period prescribed under Regulation 17(5) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018 is...
![Customs Inquiry Report Beyond 90 Days under Regulation 17(5) of CBLR is Invalid: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/24/2090345-customs-inquiry-report-taxscan.webp "Customs Inquiry Report Beyond 90 Days under Regulation 17(5) of CBLR is Invalid: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Customs Broker Penalised for Importer’s Misdeclaration of Value of Goods: Madras HC allows to Contest without 7.5% Pre-Deposit [Read Order]
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has allowed the licensed Customs broker to contest the penalty imposed with regards to an importer’s fraudulent misdeclaration of goods’ value without...
![Customs Broker Penalised for Importer’s Misdeclaration of Value of Goods: Madras HC allows to Contest without 7.5% Pre-Deposit [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/23/2090031-customs-broker-madras-high-court-taxscan.webp "Customs Broker Penalised for Importer’s Misdeclaration of Value of Goods: Madras HC allows to Contest without 7.5% Pre-Deposit [Read Order]")
Customs Authorities cannot Levy Redemption Fine Beyond Market Value of Seized Goods u/s 125 less Duty Payable: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has emphatically held that redemption fine imposed under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962, cannot exceed the market...
![Customs Authorities cannot Levy Redemption Fine Beyond Market Value of Seized Goods u/s 125 less Duty Payable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/10/2085317-customs-authorities-seized-goods-cestat-taxscan.webp "Customs Authorities cannot Levy Redemption Fine Beyond Market Value of Seized Goods u/s 125 less Duty Payable: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Clear Float Glass with Tin Absorbent Layer Classifiable as Non-Wired Glass with Absorbent/Reflecting Layer: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that clear float glass with a tin absorbent layer is classifiable as non-wired glass with an absorbent or ...
![Clear Float Glass with Tin Absorbent Layer Classifiable as Non-Wired Glass with Absorbent/Reflecting Layer: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/09/2084911-float-glass-cestat-taxscan.webp "Clear Float Glass with Tin Absorbent Layer Classifiable as Non-Wired Glass with Absorbent/Reflecting Layer: CESTAT [Read Order]")