Customs Dept Seizes 1.94 Kg Gold Hidden in Trolley Bag Linings from Married Couple at Delhi Airport
The Customs Air Intelligence Unit ( AIU ) at Indira Gandhi International Airport ( IGI ), New Delhi, carried out a major operation against gold...
![Tyres Without BIS Markings Liable for Confiscation u/s 111 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Tyres-Without-BIS-Markings-Customs-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.png "Tyres Without BIS Markings Liable for Confiscation u/s 111 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Imported Cocoa Beans: CESTAT observes 11-Month BIS Testing Delays possibly causing Quality Deterioration, Reduces Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Imported-Cocoa-Beans-Cocoa-Beans-CESTAT-Quality-Deterioration-Reduces-Penalty-BIS-Testing-taxscan.jpg "Imported Cocoa Beans: CESTAT observes 11-Month BIS Testing Delays possibly causing Quality Deterioration, Reduces Penalty [Read Order]")
CESTAT Orders Reconsideration of Special Additional Duty Refund Claim for Timber Logs, Condones 22- Day Delay in Filing Appeal [Read Order]
Recently, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) of Bangalore ordered the reconsideration of a refund claim related to the Special Additional Duty (SAD) on timber logs...
![CESTAT Orders Reconsideration of Special Additional Duty Refund Claim for Timber Logs, Condones 22- Day Delay in Filing Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-Reconsideration-Special-Additional-Duty-Refund-Claim-Timber-Logs-Condones-22-Day-Delay-Filing-Appeal-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Orders Reconsideration of Special Additional Duty Refund Claim for Timber Logs, Condones 22- Day Delay in Filing Appeal [Read Order]")
"Any Person Aggrieved " as Used in S.129 A of Customs Act Not Includes Customs Dept: CESTAT Dismisses Appeal Filed by Dept [Read Order]
The Customs Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Department on observing that “Any Person Aggrieved " as used in Section 129 A of Customs Act,1962 not includes...
![Any Person Aggrieved as Used in S.129 A of Customs Act Not Includes Customs Dept: CESTAT Dismisses Appeal Filed by Dept [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-Customs-Act-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Section-129-A-of-Customs-Act-Any-Person-Aggrieved-customs-department-CESTAT-Dismisses-CESTAT-News-CESTAT-Updates-taxscan.jpg "Any Person Aggrieved as Used in S.129 A of Customs Act Not Includes Customs Dept: CESTAT Dismisses Appeal Filed by Dept [Read Order]")
CVD at 10% Levied on Insoluble Sulphar Despite ‘Nil’ Excise Duty: CESTAT sets aside Order [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has overturned the assessing authority's order imposing a 10% Countervailing Duty (CVD) on insoluble sulfur,...
![CVD at 10% Levied on Insoluble Sulphar Despite ‘Nil’ Excise Duty: CESTAT sets aside Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/site-imd-7.jpg "CVD at 10% Levied on Insoluble Sulphar Despite ‘Nil’ Excise Duty: CESTAT sets aside Order [Read Order]")
CESTAT sets aside Confiscation under Customs Act in Absence of Evidence for Over-Valuation Of Goods [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) set aside the confiscation under Customs Act in absence of evidence of over-valuation of Goods and found that...
![CESTAT sets aside Confiscation under Customs Act in Absence of Evidence for Over-Valuation Of Goods [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/CESTAT-CESTAT-Delhi-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Customs-Act-Over-Valuation-Of-Goods-CESTAT-news-under-Rule-8-of-Customs-Valuation-Rules-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT sets aside Confiscation under Customs Act in Absence of Evidence for Over-Valuation Of Goods [Read Order]")
Bombay HC Orders Customs to Refund Rs.35L for Seized Gold Chain with Diamond Pendant Bought in 1989, Quashes Proceedings
The Bombay High Court ordered the customs department to refund Rs.35 lakh to an Indian-origin US citizen for a seized gold chain with diamond pendant he claimed to have purchased in 1989 (evidenced...
Gold cannot be Confiscated without Proof of Foreign Marking or Smuggling u/s 123 of Customs Act: CESTAT sets aside Order [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has determined that gold cannot be confiscated without concrete proof of foreign marking or smuggling. The case...
![Gold cannot be Confiscated without Proof of Foreign Marking or Smuggling u/s 123 of Customs Act: CESTAT sets aside Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/cestat-taxnews-gold-smuggling-customs-act-customs-news-cestat-news-Customs-Excise-and-Service-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "Gold cannot be Confiscated without Proof of Foreign Marking or Smuggling u/s 123 of Customs Act: CESTAT sets aside Order [Read Order]")