![Procedural Incompliances in Trial: Sessions Court at Chennai sets aside Conviction under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Procedural-Trial-Sessions-Court-Customs-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Procedural Incompliances in Trial: Sessions Court at Chennai sets aside Conviction under Customs Act [Read Order]")
Procedural Incompliances in Trial: Sessions Court at Chennai sets aside Conviction under Customs Act [Read Order]
The appellants / accused were convicted under Section 132 and 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 3(3) of the Foreign Trade...
![Onus is on Revenue to prove Smuggled Nature When Goods are notified u/s 123 Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Onus-is-on-Revenue-to-prove-smuggled-nature-when-goods-are-notified-Customs-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Onus is on Revenue to prove Smuggled Nature When Goods are notified u/s 123 Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Relief to Citibank: CESTAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 112 Customs Act on purchase of ATMs made within India [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/CESTAT-Citibank-Penalty-CESTAT-quashes-Penalty-Customs-Act-ATM-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Citibank: CESTAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 112 Customs Act on purchase of ATMs made within India [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act not permissible in the Absence of Evidence which proves the Use of Forged Scrips to clear Goods: CESTAT
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that penalty u/s 114A of the Customs Act,1962 is not permissible in the absence of evidence which proves...
Penalty under Customs Act on 'Smuggling 'not valid When Authorities act Without evincing illicit Trafficking: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), held that Penalty under Customs Act on 'smuggling 'not valid when authorities act without evincing illicit...
![Penalty under Customs Act on Smuggling not valid When Authorities act Without evincing illicit Trafficking: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Penalty-Customs-Act-Smuggling-Authorities-act-evincing-illicit-Trafficking-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty under Customs Act on Smuggling not valid When Authorities act Without evincing illicit Trafficking: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Refund Claim not hit by Limitation when filed within one year from relevant date u/s 27 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), held that Refund claim is not hit by limitation when filed within one year from relevant date under Section 27...
![Refund Claim not hit by Limitation when filed within one year from relevant date u/s 27 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Refund-Claim-hit-Limitation-relevant-Customs-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Refund Claim not hit by Limitation when filed within one year from relevant date u/s 27 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No Violation of Section111 of Customs Act: CESTAT deletes Penalty of 40 Lakhs [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Customs-Act-CESTAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "No Violation of Section111 of Customs Act: CESTAT deletes Penalty of 40 Lakhs [Read Order]")
Confiscation of Goods and Penalty imposed under Customs Act solely based on Statement adduced is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the Consification of goods and penalty imposed under Customs Act as it was solely based on a statement...
![Confiscation of Goods and Penalty imposed under Customs Act solely based on Statement adduced is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Penalty-Customs-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Confiscation of Goods and Penalty imposed under Customs Act solely based on Statement adduced is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]")