![Export Obligations met: Penalty on duty exempted Lauryl Alcohol quashed by Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Export-Obligations-Penalty-duty-exempted-Lauryl-Alcohol-Bombay-HighCourt-Taxscan.jpg "Export Obligations met: Penalty on duty exempted Lauryl Alcohol quashed by Bombay HC [Read Order]")
Export Obligations met: Penalty on duty exempted Lauryl Alcohol quashed by Bombay HC [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has recently quashed an order, demanding penalty and duty on Lauryl Alcohol, seized from the respondent-assessee, Galaxy...
![‘NOC’ not required to be obtained from Drug Inspector and Free to Export Drugs, Penalty under Customs Act not imposable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/NOC-Drug-Export-Drugs-Penalty-Customs-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "‘NOC’ not required to be obtained from Drug Inspector and Free to Export Drugs, Penalty under Customs Act not imposable: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Importer Abandoned Goods: Delhi HC directs Buyer to Pay 50% Detention Charges under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Importer-Abandoned-Goods-Importer-Delhi-High-Court-Buyer-Customs-Act-Customs-taxscan.jpg "Importer Abandoned Goods: Delhi HC directs Buyer to Pay 50% Detention Charges under Customs Act [Read Order]")
![Procedural Incompliances in Trial: Sessions Court at Chennai sets aside Conviction under Customs Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Procedural-Trial-Sessions-Court-Customs-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Procedural Incompliances in Trial: Sessions Court at Chennai sets aside Conviction under Customs Act [Read Order]")
Onus is on Revenue to prove Smuggled Nature When Goods are notified u/s 123 Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Bench held that Onus is on Revenue to prove smuggled nature when goods are notified under Section 123 Customs Act. Raj Kumar...
![Onus is on Revenue to prove Smuggled Nature When Goods are notified u/s 123 Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Onus-is-on-Revenue-to-prove-smuggled-nature-when-goods-are-notified-Customs-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Onus is on Revenue to prove Smuggled Nature When Goods are notified u/s 123 Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Relief to Citibank: CESTAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 112 Customs Act on purchase of ATMs made within India [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) at Mumbai has recently held that the penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 is not valid for purchase of ATMs and...
![Relief to Citibank: CESTAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 112 Customs Act on purchase of ATMs made within India [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/CESTAT-Citibank-Penalty-CESTAT-quashes-Penalty-Customs-Act-ATM-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Citibank: CESTAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 112 Customs Act on purchase of ATMs made within India [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act not permissible in the Absence of Evidence which proves the Use of Forged Scrips to clear Goods: CESTAT
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that penalty u/s 114A of the Customs Act,1962 is not permissible in the absence of evidence which proves...
Penalty under Customs Act on 'Smuggling 'not valid When Authorities act Without evincing illicit Trafficking: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), held that Penalty under Customs Act on 'smuggling 'not valid when authorities act without evincing illicit...
![Penalty under Customs Act on Smuggling not valid When Authorities act Without evincing illicit Trafficking: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Penalty-Customs-Act-Smuggling-Authorities-act-evincing-illicit-Trafficking-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty under Customs Act on Smuggling not valid When Authorities act Without evincing illicit Trafficking: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Refund Claim not hit by Limitation when filed within one year from relevant date u/s 27 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), held that Refund claim is not hit by limitation when filed within one year from relevant date under Section 27...
![Refund Claim not hit by Limitation when filed within one year from relevant date u/s 27 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Refund-Claim-hit-Limitation-relevant-Customs-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Refund Claim not hit by Limitation when filed within one year from relevant date u/s 27 of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")