![Relief to JSW Steel Ltd: CESTAT Quashes Demand of Central Excise Duty on ground of Inclusion of WPL as category of Waste Component [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/JSW-steels-ltd-quash-demand-central-excise-duty-assessee-waste-pickle-liquid-waste-taxscan.jpg "Relief to JSW Steel Ltd: CESTAT Quashes Demand of Central Excise Duty on ground of Inclusion of WPL as category of Waste Component [Read Order]")
Relief to JSW Steel Ltd: CESTAT Quashes Demand of Central Excise Duty on ground of Inclusion of WPL as category of Waste Component [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the order of demand of central excise duty on the...
![No Separate Demand of Service Tax made to Individual Service of Transportation under category of Cargo Handling Service: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Transportation-individual-separate-demand-of-tax-service-tax-cargo-handling-services-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Separate Demand of Service Tax made to Individual Service of Transportation under category of Cargo Handling Service: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Differential Service Tax Demand on “Erection Service”, “Pipeline Service” and “Supply of Manpower Service”: CESTAT Remands Back Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Differential-Service-Tax-Demand-Erection-Service-Pipeline-Service-Supply-of-Manpower-Service-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Differential Service Tax Demand on “Erection Service”, “Pipeline Service” and “Supply of Manpower Service”: CESTAT Remands Back Matter [Read Order]")
![Composite Contract cannot be Artificially Bifurcated to Levy Service Value: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Composite-Contract-Artificially-Bifurcated-Levy-Service-Value-CESTAT-Service-Tax-Demand-CESTAT-excise-customs-service-tax-taxscan.jpg "Composite Contract cannot be Artificially Bifurcated to Levy Service Value: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![Penalty not Demandable when Assessee has Not Crossed the Threshold limit on Exemption: CESTAT sets aside Demand relying on Form H [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Penalty-not-Demandable-when-Assessee-has-Not-Crossed-the-Threshold-limit-on-Exemption-CESTAT-sets-aside-Demand-relying-on-Form-H-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty not Demandable when Assessee has Not Crossed the Threshold limit on Exemption: CESTAT sets aside Demand relying on Form H [Read Order]")
Kerala HC quashes Property Tax Demand without Assessment of Property under Kerala Panchayat Raj Act [Read Order]
In a recent judgment the Kerala High Court quashed the property tax demand made without assessment of property under the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994. The petitioner, Mohammed Kabeer had...
![Kerala HC quashes Property Tax Demand without Assessment of Property under Kerala Panchayat Raj Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Kerala-High-Court-Kerala-HC-quashes-Property-Tax-Demand-Property-Tax-Demand-Tax-Demand-Tax-Demand-Assessment-of-Property-Assessment-Kerala-Panchayat-Raj-Act-Panchayat-Raj-Act-taxscan.jpg "Kerala HC quashes Property Tax Demand without Assessment of Property under Kerala Panchayat Raj Act [Read Order]")
AO Wrongly Raises Demand on Dividend Distribution Tax Despite Submitting Proof of Payment: ITAT Directs Readjudication [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently directed readjudication due to the Assessing Officer (AO) wrongly raising a demand on dividend distribution tax, despite the...
![AO Wrongly Raises Demand on Dividend Distribution Tax Despite Submitting Proof of Payment: ITAT Directs Readjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/AO-Wrongly-Raises-Demand-on-Dividend-Distribution-Tax-AO-Wrongly-Raises-Demand-Proof-of-Payment-ITAT-Directs-Readjudication-taxscan.jpg "AO Wrongly Raises Demand on Dividend Distribution Tax Despite Submitting Proof of Payment: ITAT Directs Readjudication [Read Order]")
TDS Demand on Amount Already Paid Tax Leads to Double Taxation: ITAT deletes Demand u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) of IT Act [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the demand of Tax deducted at source (TDS) on the amount already paid tax under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax...
![TDS Demand on Amount Already Paid Tax Leads to Double Taxation: ITAT deletes Demand u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) of IT Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TDS-Demand-TDS-Paid-Tax-Leads-to-Double-Taxation-Paid-Tax-Double-Taxation-Taxation-ITAT-deletes-Demand-ITAT-Demand-IT-Act-Taxscan.jpg "TDS Demand on Amount Already Paid Tax Leads to Double Taxation: ITAT deletes Demand u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) of IT Act [Read Order]")
Existence of Alternative Remedy: Gauhati HC Refuses to Entertain Writ against Service Tax Demand [Read Order]
The Gauhati High Court refused to entertain writ petition against service tax demand on the existence of alternative remedy. The petitioner no. 1, Ayursundra Hospitals (Guwahati) Pvt Ltd and Anr,...
![Existence of Alternative Remedy: Gauhati HC Refuses to Entertain Writ against Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/service-tax.jpg "Existence of Alternative Remedy: Gauhati HC Refuses to Entertain Writ against Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
CESTAT quashes SCN on Absence of Gist of Allegations for Raising Service Tax Demand on RCM basis [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed a show cause notice (SCN) on absence of gist of allegations for raising service tax demand on Reverse...
![CESTAT quashes SCN on Absence of Gist of Allegations for Raising Service Tax Demand on RCM basis [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/CESTAT-quashes-SCN-CESTAT-SCN-Raising-Service-Tax-Demand-Service-Tax-Demand-on-RCM-basis-Service-Tax-Demand-Service-Tax-RCM-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT quashes SCN on Absence of Gist of Allegations for Raising Service Tax Demand on RCM basis [Read Order]")
Demand of Extended Period is not Sustainable on no Proof of Suppression of fact: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 11AC of CETA [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed the penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (CETA) and observed that the demand of...
![Demand of Extended Period is not Sustainable on no Proof of Suppression of fact: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 11AC of CETA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Demand-of-Extended-Period-Demand-Extended-Period-Sustainable-Proof-of-Suppression-of-fact-CESTAT-CESTAT-quashes-Penalty-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Demand of Extended Period is not Sustainable on no Proof of Suppression of fact: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 11AC of CETA [Read Order]")
Designing and Execution of Stalls on Customer’s Request Amounts to Work Contract Service: CESTAT sets aside Demand under 'Interior Decorator'
In a significant case, the Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that designing and execution of stalls on a customer’s request amounts to work...
