![Absence of GSTAT: Orissa HC stays Penalty and Interest Demand by GST Authorities [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/GSTAT-Absence-of-GSTAT-Orissa-High-Court-Penalty-Interest-Demand-Interest-GST-Authorities-GST-taxscan.jpg "Absence of GSTAT: Orissa HC stays Penalty and Interest Demand by GST Authorities [Read Order]")
Absence of GSTAT: Orissa HC stays Penalty and Interest Demand by GST Authorities [Read Order]
In the absence of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), the Orissa High Court bench of Justice Dr. B.R. Sarangi and Justice M S...
![CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand on Training of Officers outside India by Foreign Agency [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/CESTAT-Ahmedabad-Service-Tax-Tax-Demand-Demand-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand on Training of Officers outside India by Foreign Agency [Read Order]")
![Dept. cannot Demand Service Tax Paid under RCMÂ by Service Provider again from the Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Demand-Service-Tax-RCM-Service-Provider-Assessee-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-taxscan.jpg "Dept. cannot Demand Service Tax Paid under RCMÂ by Service Provider again from the Assessee: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Section 75(4) U.P. GST Act is Mandatory, Even if no Demand in Writing for Hearing is made out: Allahabad HC Quashes Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Section-754-UP-GST-Act-Demand-Writing-Allahabad-HC-Order-TAXSCAN.jpg "Section 75(4) U.P. GST Act is Mandatory, Even if no Demand in Writing for Hearing is made out: Allahabad HC Quashes Order [Read Order]")
HP HC dismisses S.138 NI Act Appeal for not making Demand of Amount covered by Bounced Cheque [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Himachal Pradesh High Court (HC), bench of Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, dismissed the appeal for not making the demand of the amount covered by the bounced cheque. The court...
Demand of Entire Delayed Payment in Cash Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rule is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) the demand for entire delayed payment in cash Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rule, 2002 is not valid. ...
![Demand of Entire Delayed Payment in Cash Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rule is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Demand-Payment-Delayed-Payment-Cash-Central-Excise-Rule-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Demand of Entire Delayed Payment in Cash Rule 8 (3A) of Central Excise Rule is not valid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Demand of Excise Duty for Semi-Finished Goods is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Demand-Excise-Duty-Semi-Finished-Goods-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Demand of Excise Duty for Semi-Finished Goods is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No Reliance can be Placed on Confessional Statements in Absence of Cross-Examination: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), Ahmedabad Bench quashed excise duty demand and ruled that no reliance can be placed on confessional statements in the absence of...
![No Reliance can be Placed on Confessional Statements in Absence of Cross-Examination: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Confessional-Statements-Cross-Examination-CESTAT-Excise-Duty-Demand-Excise-Duty-Demand-Excise-Customs-Service-Tax-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "No Reliance can be Placed on Confessional Statements in Absence of Cross-Examination: CESTAT quashes Excise Duty Demand [Read Order]")
![CESTAT upholds demand of Excise Duty along with Interest on Integral Coach Factory [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/CESTAT-demand-of-Excise-Duty-Excise-Duty-demand-Interest-on-Integral-Coach-Factory-Integral-Coach-Factory-Interest-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT upholds demand of Excise Duty along with Interest on Integral Coach Factory [Read Order]")
CESTAT quashes Order Confirming Demand for Extended Period after holding No Suppression of Facts [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench comprising of Sulekha Beevi CS, Judicial Member and Vasa Seshagiri Rao, Technical Member quashed order confirming demand...
![CESTAT quashes Order Confirming Demand for Extended Period after holding No Suppression of Facts [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/CESTA-demand-extended-period-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT quashes Order Confirming Demand for Extended Period after holding No Suppression of Facts [Read Order]")
![Relief to ITC: CESTAT sets aside Demand for Excise Duty and Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/ITC-CESTAT-Demand-Excise-Duty-Excise-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Relief to ITC: CESTAT sets aside Demand for Excise Duty and Penalty [Read Order]")