![CESTAT quashes Order Confirming Demand for Extended Period after holding No Suppression of Facts [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/CESTA-demand-extended-period-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT quashes Order Confirming Demand for Extended Period after holding No Suppression of Facts [Read Order]")
CESTAT quashes Order Confirming Demand for Extended Period after holding No Suppression of Facts [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench comprising of Sulekha Beevi CS, Judicial Member and Vasa Seshagiri...
![Relief to ITC: CESTAT sets aside Demand for Excise Duty and Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/ITC-CESTAT-Demand-Excise-Duty-Excise-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Relief to ITC: CESTAT sets aside Demand for Excise Duty and Penalty [Read Order]")
![Belated Filing of Appeal against Order of Demand of GST and Penalty: Calcutta HC allows Manual Filing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Filing-of-Appeal-Order-Order-of-Demand-GST-Penalty-Calcutta-High-Court-Manual-Filing-Taxscan.jpg "Belated Filing of Appeal against Order of Demand of GST and Penalty: Calcutta HC allows Manual Filing [Read Order]")
![Demand can be made under Undertaking only when DGCA finds that Use of Aircraft not in accordance with permit granted: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Demand-Undertaking-DGCA-Aircraft-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Demand can be made under Undertaking only when DGCA finds that Use of Aircraft not in accordance with permit granted: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![PSI Certificate furnished as per Appendix 28 of FTP: CESTAT sets aside demand of Redemption Fine [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/PSI-Certificate-Appendix-FTP-CESTAT-demand-Redemption-Fine-taxscan.jpg "PSI Certificate furnished as per Appendix 28 of FTP: CESTAT sets aside demand of Redemption Fine [Read Order]")
No Interest demand in absence of Condition precedent u/s 11AA of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) ruled that no interest demand can be made in absence of condition precedent under Section 11AA of Central...
![No Interest demand in absence of Condition precedent u/s 11AA of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Interest-demand-Interest-demand-Central-Excise-Act-Central-Excise-Excise-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Interest demand in absence of Condition precedent u/s 11AA of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Demand based on Audit without further Investigation is invalid: CESTAT quashes Service Tax demand [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), quashed service tax demand on the ground that demand based on audit without further investigation is invalid. ...
![Demand based on Audit without further Investigation is invalid: CESTAT quashes Service Tax demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Demand-Audit-Investigation-CESTAT-Service-Tax-demand-Service-Tax-Customs-Excise-CESTAT-quashes-Service-Tax-demand-taxscan.jpg "Demand based on Audit without further Investigation is invalid: CESTAT quashes Service Tax demand [Read Order]")
No Misdeclaration under Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, Demand of Duty not permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that demand of duty is not permissible when no misdeclaration under Pan Masala Packing Machines...
![No Misdeclaration under Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, Demand of Duty not permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Pan-Masala-Packing-Machines-Rules-Pan-Masala-Packing-Machines-Pan-Masala-Rules-Demand-of-Duty-Demand-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Misdeclaration under Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules, Demand of Duty not permissible: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Violation of 30 Day period u/s S.74(A): Patna HC sets aside GST Demand Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Violation-of-30-Day-period-Patna-HC-sets-aside-GST-Demand-Order-TAXSCAN.jpg "Violation of 30 Day period u/s S.74(A): Patna HC sets aside GST Demand Order [Read Order]")
Failure of proving Demand of Bribe beyond Reasonable Doubt: Telangana HC confirms Acquittal of Excise Officer [Read Order]
The Telangana High Court has confirmed the acquittal of the Excise Officer as the demand of bribe was not proved beyond reasonable doubt. In the instant case an appeal was filed under section 378...
![Failure of proving Demand of Bribe beyond Reasonable Doubt: Telangana HC confirms Acquittal of Excise Officer [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Demand-Bribe-Telangana-High-Court-Acquittal-of-Excise-Officer-Excise-Officer-Excise-Taxscan.jpg "Failure of proving Demand of Bribe beyond Reasonable Doubt: Telangana HC confirms Acquittal of Excise Officer [Read Order]")
CESTAT sets aside demand of cost recovery charges by Commissioner under 5(2) and 6(1)(o) of 2009 Regulations [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), set aside demand of cost recovery charges by Commissioner under 5(2) and 6(1)(o) of Handling of Cargo in...
![CESTAT sets aside demand of cost recovery charges by Commissioner under 5(2) and 6(1)(o) of 2009 Regulations [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/CESTAT-demand-cost-recovery-charges-Commissioner-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT sets aside demand of cost recovery charges by Commissioner under 5(2) and 6(1)(o) of 2009 Regulations [Read Order]")
Section 35 of SARFAESI Act prevails over Rules of 2015, Demand of Transfer Fee not allowable: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]
The Chhattisgarh High Court has held that Section 35 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002(SARFAESI) Act prevails over the Rules...
![Section 35 of SARFAESI Act prevails over Rules of 2015, Demand of Transfer Fee not allowable: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Section-35-SARFAESI-Act-Demand-Transfer-Fee-Chhattisgarh-HC-taxscan.jpg "Section 35 of SARFAESI Act prevails over Rules of 2015, Demand of Transfer Fee not allowable: Chhattisgarh HC [Read Order]")