![ITAT Upholds ITR of Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, Deletes ₹4.11 Crore Disallowance u/s 14A [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/04/500x300_2102268-itat-itr-aishwarya-rai-bachchan-disallowance-taxscan.webp "ITAT Upholds ITR of Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, Deletes ₹4.11 Crore Disallowance u/s 14A [Read Order]")
ITAT Upholds ITR of Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, Deletes ₹4.11 Crore Disallowance u/s 14A [Read Order]
The Income‑Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench (ITAT) has dismissed the Revenue’s appeal against Aishwarya Rai Bachchan in her income‑tax dispute...
![No Defect in Books Found: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Ad-Hoc 5% Disallowance on Various Business Expenses [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/04/250x150_2102187-itat-disallowance-business-expenses-various-business-expenses-no-defect-in-books-found-taxscan.webp "No Defect in Books Found: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Ad-Hoc 5% Disallowance on Various Business Expenses [Read Order]")
![Absence of Recorded Satisfaction Invalidates Disallowance u/s 14A: ITAT rules in Favour of SICPA India [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/02/250x150_2101657-absence-recorded-satisfaction-invalidates-disallowance-us-14a-itat-rules-favour-sicpa-india-txn.webp "Absence of Recorded Satisfaction Invalidates Disallowance u/s 14A: ITAT rules in Favour of SICPA India [Read Order]")
![AO Failed to Record Proper Satisfaction to Invoke R. 8D: ITAT Restricts Disallowance to SIDBIs Calculation [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/01/250x150_2101461-proper-satisfaction-itat-disallowance-sidbis-sidbis-calculation-itat-restricts-disallowance-taxscan.webp "AO Failed to Record Proper Satisfaction to Invoke R. 8D: ITAT Restricts Disallowance to SIDBIs Calculation [Read Order]")
![Delhivery Subsidiary Ecom Express Receives ₹2.63 Crore GST Demand for Alleged ITC Disallowance and Tax Shortfall [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/250x150_2099365-gst-demand-alleged-itc-delhivery-subsidiary-ecom-express-taxscan.webp "Delhivery Subsidiary Ecom Express Receives ₹2.63 Crore GST Demand for Alleged ITC Disallowance and Tax Shortfall [Read Order]")
Awaiting CCIT order on Delayed ITR Condonation Petition: ITAT Remands on 80P Deduction Disallowance Matter [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remitted the issue regarding the disallowance of the Section 80P deduction back to the file of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ...
![Awaiting CCIT order on Delayed ITR Condonation Petition: ITAT Remands on 80P Deduction Disallowance Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/500x300_2099278-ccit-order-delayed-itr-condonation-petition-itat-remands-80p-deduction-disallowance-taxscan.webp "Awaiting CCIT order on Delayed ITR Condonation Petition: ITAT Remands on 80P Deduction Disallowance Matter [Read Order]")
No Addition Made w.r.t. Loans u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Disallowance of Interest Claim [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the disallowance of interest claim, on the ground that no addition was made with respect to the Loans u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. ...
![No Addition Made w.r.t. Loans u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Disallowance of Interest Claim [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/16/500x300_2097103-disallowance-income-tax-act-interest-claim-taxscan.webp "No Addition Made w.r.t. Loans u/s 68 of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Disallowance of Interest Claim [Read Order]")
Disallowance Restricted to 12.5% in Quantum Appeal: ITAT Deletes Penalty Citing Faulty Charge [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of theIncome Tax Act, 1961, noting a clear disconnect between the charge fastened on ...
![Disallowance Restricted to 12.5% in Quantum Appeal: ITAT Deletes Penalty Citing Faulty Charge [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/16/500x300_2097123-itat-mumbai-disallowance-penalty-taxscan.webp "Disallowance Restricted to 12.5% in Quantum Appeal: ITAT Deletes Penalty Citing Faulty Charge [Read Order]")
Disallowance Invalid When Amount Not Charged to P&L: ITAT deletes ₹25.55 Lakh WIP Addition Citing 'Presumption' Basis [Read Order]
Axora Resources Limited The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted an addition of ₹25,55,776 made on account of unsubstantiated Capital Work-in-Progress (WIP) and held...
![Disallowance Invalid When Amount Not Charged to P&L: ITAT deletes ₹25.55 Lakh WIP Addition Citing Presumption Basis [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/16/500x300_2097124-disallowance-charged-to-pl-itat-wip-addition-citing-wip-additio-taxscan.webp "Disallowance Invalid When Amount Not Charged to P&L: ITAT deletes ₹25.55 Lakh WIP Addition Citing Presumption Basis [Read Order]")
ITAT grants Dual Relief to Bennett Coleman: Deletes ₹6.26 Crore Disallowance and Allows Indexation Benefit on STT Paid Securities [Read Order]
The appeal was filed by Bennett Coleman & Co. Ltd., who is engaged in the business of buying and selling media properties, against the order dated 27 March 2024 passed by the Commissioner of...
![ITAT grants Dual Relief to Bennett Coleman: Deletes ₹6.26 Crore Disallowance and Allows Indexation Benefit on STT Paid Securities [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/15/500x300_2096911-itat-grants-dual-relief-to-bennett-coleman-disallowance-taxscan.webp "ITAT grants Dual Relief to Bennett Coleman: Deletes ₹6.26 Crore Disallowance and Allows Indexation Benefit on STT Paid Securities [Read Order]")
Lack of Proof and Documentation for Sub-Contractor Payments: ITAT upholds 20% Disallowance on Expenditure Payments
The Rajkot Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] to sustain a 20% adhoc disallowance of direct expenditure for ...
AO's Incomplete Consideration of Member Categories Invalidates Disallowance: ITAT Remands Matter [Read Order]
The Visakhapatnam Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) stating that the AO had failed to consider the different categories of members ...
![AOs Incomplete Consideration of Member Categories Invalidates Disallowance: ITAT Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/15/500x300_2096892-disallowance-itat-visakhapatnam-itat-remands-taxscan.webp "AOs Incomplete Consideration of Member Categories Invalidates Disallowance: ITAT Remands Matter [Read Order]")