![No Evidence of Rental receipt from Property: ITAT sustain Addition on Cash Deposits into Bank Account [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Evidence-Rental-receipt-ITAT-Addition-Cash-Deposits-Bank-Account-taxscan.jpg "No Evidence of Rental receipt from Property: ITAT sustain Addition on Cash Deposits into Bank Account [Read Order]")
No Evidence of Rental receipt from Property: ITAT sustain Addition on Cash Deposits into Bank Account [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chennai sustained addition on cash deposits into bank account as there was no evidence of rental receipt...
![No Evidence of Suppression of Gross Profit by obtaining Bogus Purchase: Delhi HC Deletes Income Tax Addition [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Evidence-Bogus-Purchase-Gross-profit-Delhi-HC-taxscan.jpg "No Evidence of Suppression of Gross Profit by obtaining Bogus Purchase: Delhi HC Deletes Income Tax Addition [Read Judgment]")
![AMP Expenses incurred cannot be termed as an International Transaction in absence of evidence: Delhi HC upholds order of ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/AMP-Expenses-International-Transaction-evidence-Delhi-HC-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "AMP Expenses incurred cannot be termed as an International Transaction in absence of evidence: Delhi HC upholds order of ITAT [Read Order]")
![Remand of matter on Non-Imposition of Penalty serves sufficient chance to put forward Documents and Evidence Afresh: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Penalty-Documents-and-Evidence-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Remand of matter on Non-Imposition of Penalty serves sufficient chance to put forward Documents and Evidence Afresh: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Addition on Cash Deposit during Demonetisation is not permissible when opportunity to adduce evidence to prove the Source was given: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Cash-Deposit-Demonetisationis-opportunity-evidence-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Addition on Cash Deposit during Demonetisation is not permissible when opportunity to adduce evidence to prove the Source was given: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT considers Revised Tax Audit Report as Additional Evidence as it is vital piece of evidence [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh Bench held that ITAT considered Revised Tax Audit Report as additional evidence as it is vital piece of evidence. The assessee, Anil Kumar...
![ITAT considers Revised Tax Audit Report as Additional Evidence as it is vital piece of evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/ITAT-Revised-Tax-Audit-Report-evidence-taxscan.jpg "ITAT considers Revised Tax Audit Report as Additional Evidence as it is vital piece of evidence [Read Order]")
![CESTAT sets aside Clandestine removal of Zafrani Zarda and Gutkha on Lack of Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CESTAT-clandestine-removal-ZafraniZarda-Gutkha-Evidence-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT sets aside Clandestine removal of Zafrani Zarda and Gutkha on Lack of Evidence [Read Order]")
Claim of Depreciation on Windmill permissible when the evidence adduced to prove usage of the same: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)has held that a claim of depreciation on a windmill is permissible when evidence is adduced to prove the usage of the same. ...
![Claim of Depreciation on Windmill permissible when the evidence adduced to prove usage of the same: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Claim-Windmill-permissible-evidence-proveusage-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Claim of Depreciation on Windmill permissible when the evidence adduced to prove usage of the same: ITAT [Read Order]")
Ignoring Assessee’s Submissions and Additional Evidence is 'Patently and Legally Wrong': ITAT condemns NFAC’s Approach [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh bench has slammed the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) for not acknowledging the submissions and additional evidence produced by the...
![Ignoring Assessee’s Submissions and Additional Evidence is Patently and Legally Wrong: ITAT condemns NFAC’s Approach [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Additional-Evidence-ITAT-NFAC-taxscan.jpeg "Ignoring Assessee’s Submissions and Additional Evidence is Patently and Legally Wrong: ITAT condemns NFAC’s Approach [Read Order]")
Addition u/s 68 on Assessee Company not sustainable when the onus was discharged with sufficient evidence: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Ahmedabad bench held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act,1961 on the assessee company is not sustainable when the onus was discharged with...
![Addition u/s 68 on Assessee Company not sustainable when the onus was discharged with sufficient evidence: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Addition-assessee-sufficient-evidence-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Addition u/s 68 on Assessee Company not sustainable when the onus was discharged with sufficient evidence: ITAT [Read Order]")
Acceptance of Additional Evidence filed by Assessee without complying Rule 46A of the 1962 Rules is invalid: ITAT [Read Order]
Acceptance of additional evidences filed by assessee without complying Rule 46A of the 1962 Rules is invalid, so was held by Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Allahabad. The assessee, Tilak...
![Acceptance of Additional Evidence filed by Assessee without complying Rule 46A of the 1962 Rules is invalid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/additional-evidences-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Acceptance of Additional Evidence filed by Assessee without complying Rule 46A of the 1962 Rules is invalid: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Evidence of Tax Evasion by showing Fictitious or False Transactions: ITAT deletes Addition of Expenditure u/s 40A(3) [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Patna Bench has held that no evidence of tax evasion by showing fictitious or false transactions and deleted the addition of expenditure under section...
![No Evidence of Tax Evasion by showing Fictitious or False Transactions: ITAT deletes Addition of Expenditure u/s 40A(3) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Evidence-Tax-Evasion-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "No Evidence of Tax Evasion by showing Fictitious or False Transactions: ITAT deletes Addition of Expenditure u/s 40A(3) [Read Order]")