![No Evidence on relation between Seller and Buyer to Influence Price of Imported Goods: CESTAT sets aside rejection of Transaction Value [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/No-Evidence-Imported-Goods-CESTAT-Transaction-Value-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Evidence on relation between Seller and Buyer to Influence Price of Imported Goods: CESTAT sets aside rejection of Transaction Value [Read Order]")
No Evidence on relation between Seller and Buyer to Influence Price of Imported Goods: CESTAT sets aside rejection of Transaction Value [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), set aside rejection on transaction value on absence of...
![Failure to Produce relevant Evidence: ITAT confirms Addition of Capital Gain by Disallowing Cost of Purchase and Cost of Improvement [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/relevant-Evidence-ITAT-Capital-Gain-Disallowing-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Failure to Produce relevant Evidence: ITAT confirms Addition of Capital Gain by Disallowing Cost of Purchase and Cost of Improvement [Read Order]")
![Details and Evidence to prove Identity & Creditworthiness of Share Subscribers submitted, Addition u/s 68 not permissible: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Evidence-prove-Identity-Creditworthiness-ITAT-TAXSACN.jpg "Details and Evidence to prove Identity & Creditworthiness of Share Subscribers submitted, Addition u/s 68 not permissible: ITAT [Read Order]")
![No Evidence of Rental receipt from Property: ITAT sustain Addition on Cash Deposits into Bank Account [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Evidence-Rental-receipt-ITAT-Addition-Cash-Deposits-Bank-Account-taxscan.jpg "No Evidence of Rental receipt from Property: ITAT sustain Addition on Cash Deposits into Bank Account [Read Order]")
![No Evidence of Suppression of Gross Profit by obtaining Bogus Purchase: Delhi HC Deletes Income Tax Addition [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Evidence-Bogus-Purchase-Gross-profit-Delhi-HC-taxscan.jpg "No Evidence of Suppression of Gross Profit by obtaining Bogus Purchase: Delhi HC Deletes Income Tax Addition [Read Judgment]")
AMP Expenses incurred cannot be termed as an International Transaction in absence of evidence: Delhi HC upholds order of ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has held that AMP expenses incurred cannot be termed as an international transaction in absence of evidence and upheld the order of the ITAT. M/s. Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd, the...
![AMP Expenses incurred cannot be termed as an International Transaction in absence of evidence: Delhi HC upholds order of ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/AMP-Expenses-International-Transaction-evidence-Delhi-HC-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "AMP Expenses incurred cannot be termed as an International Transaction in absence of evidence: Delhi HC upholds order of ITAT [Read Order]")
Remand of matter on Non-Imposition of Penalty serves sufficient chance to put forward Documents and Evidence Afresh: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has ruled that remand of matter on non-imposition of Penalty serves sufficient chance to put forward documents and...
![Remand of matter on Non-Imposition of Penalty serves sufficient chance to put forward Documents and Evidence Afresh: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Penalty-Documents-and-Evidence-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Remand of matter on Non-Imposition of Penalty serves sufficient chance to put forward Documents and Evidence Afresh: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Addition on Cash Deposit during Demonetisation is not permissible when opportunity to adduce evidence to prove the Source was given: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)has held that addition on cash deposit During Demonetisation is not permissible when the opportunity to adduce evidence to prove the...
![Addition on Cash Deposit during Demonetisation is not permissible when opportunity to adduce evidence to prove the Source was given: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Cash-Deposit-Demonetisationis-opportunity-evidence-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Addition on Cash Deposit during Demonetisation is not permissible when opportunity to adduce evidence to prove the Source was given: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT considers Revised Tax Audit Report as Additional Evidence as it is vital piece of evidence [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh Bench held that ITAT considered Revised Tax Audit Report as additional evidence as it is vital piece of evidence. The assessee, Anil Kumar...
![ITAT considers Revised Tax Audit Report as Additional Evidence as it is vital piece of evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/ITAT-Revised-Tax-Audit-Report-evidence-taxscan.jpg "ITAT considers Revised Tax Audit Report as Additional Evidence as it is vital piece of evidence [Read Order]")
![CESTAT sets aside Clandestine removal of Zafrani Zarda and Gutkha on Lack of Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CESTAT-clandestine-removal-ZafraniZarda-Gutkha-Evidence-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT sets aside Clandestine removal of Zafrani Zarda and Gutkha on Lack of Evidence [Read Order]")
Claim of Depreciation on Windmill permissible when the evidence adduced to prove usage of the same: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)has held that a claim of depreciation on a windmill is permissible when evidence is adduced to prove the usage of the same. ...
![Claim of Depreciation on Windmill permissible when the evidence adduced to prove usage of the same: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Claim-Windmill-permissible-evidence-proveusage-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Claim of Depreciation on Windmill permissible when the evidence adduced to prove usage of the same: ITAT [Read Order]")
Ignoring Assessee’s Submissions and Additional Evidence is 'Patently and Legally Wrong': ITAT condemns NFAC’s Approach [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chandigarh bench has slammed the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) for not acknowledging the submissions and additional evidence produced by the...
![Ignoring Assessee’s Submissions and Additional Evidence is Patently and Legally Wrong: ITAT condemns NFAC’s Approach [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Additional-Evidence-ITAT-NFAC-taxscan.jpeg "Ignoring Assessee’s Submissions and Additional Evidence is Patently and Legally Wrong: ITAT condemns NFAC’s Approach [Read Order]")