![Addition on Excess Cane Price and Concessional Sugar Sale Remands for want of Evidence: ITAT directs Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/28/500x300_2081590-sugar-sale-evidence-itat-fresh-adjudication-excess-cane-price-taxscan.webp "Addition on Excess Cane Price and Concessional Sugar Sale Remands for want of Evidence: ITAT directs Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Addition on Excess Cane Price and Concessional Sugar Sale Remands for want of Evidence: ITAT directs Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune, remanded appeals, considering (i) excess sugarcane price paid to members and (ii) sale of sugar at...
![Reopening Assessments based only on Survey Material without Tangible Evidence of PE in India is not Valid: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/250x150_2080444-reopening-assessments-reopening-assessments-based-only-on-survey-material-taxscan.webp "Reopening Assessments based only on Survey Material without Tangible Evidence of PE in India is not Valid: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Receiving Gifts Before Wedding Date Cannot Be Treated as Ungenuine Without Proof: ITAT Deletes ₹4.31 Lakh Unexplained Cash Deposit Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/19/250x150_2078331-receiving-gifts-before-wedding-date-wedding-gifts-taxscan.webp "Receiving Gifts Before Wedding Date Cannot Be Treated as Ungenuine Without Proof: ITAT Deletes ₹4.31 Lakh Unexplained Cash Deposit Addition [Read Order]")
![Factual Dispute on Custody Legal or Proper in Gold Smuggling Case not for Writ Jurisdiction: Telangana HC Directs to Remedy under BNSS [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/250x150_2075131-factual-dispute-on-custody-legal-custody-legal-or-proper-in-gold-smuggling-case-taxscan.webp "Factual Dispute on Custody Legal or Proper in Gold Smuggling Case not for Writ Jurisdiction: Telangana HC Directs to Remedy under BNSS [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Dept Could not Place alleged accommodation entries which led to Addition u/s 69A: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/31/250x150_2071599-income-tax-dept-income-tax-dept-could-not-place-alleged-accommodation-entries-taxscan.webp "Income Tax Dept Could not Place alleged accommodation entries which led to Addition u/s 69A: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]")
₹1.5 Crore Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Deletion of Addition [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) upheld Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[CIT(A)]’s order deleting a ₹1.5 crore addition treated as an accommodation entry under...
![₹1.5 Crore Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Deletion of Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/500x300_2070083-treated-as-unexplained-cash-credit-unexplained-cash-credit-unexplained-cash-tascan.webp "₹1.5 Crore Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Deletion of Addition [Read Order]")
![Income Addition Based on Third-Party Disclosure Without Evidence Not Sustainable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/24/500x300_2068575-itat-income-addition-disclosure-taxscan.webp "Income Addition Based on Third-Party Disclosure Without Evidence Not Sustainable: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Tender Scam: Jharkhand HC rejects Bail Plea of Ex-Minister in PMLA Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/21/500x300_2066798-tender-scam-jharkhand-hc-jharkhand-hc-rejects-bail-plea-rejection-of-bail-plea-taxscan.webp "Tender Scam: Jharkhand HC rejects Bail Plea of Ex-Minister in PMLA Case [Read Order]")
CIT(A) cannot Reject Additional evidence u/r 46 A of Income Tax Rules against unexplained Investment Merely because of non-furnishing before AO: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee to furnish the additional evidence under rule 46 A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 before the Assessing Officer...
![CIT(A) cannot Reject Additional evidence u/r 46 A of Income Tax Rules against unexplained Investment Merely because of non-furnishing before AO: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/17/500x300_2064739-cita-cita-cannot-reject-additional-evidence-evidence-section-46-a-of-income-tax-rules-taxscan.webp "CIT(A) cannot Reject Additional evidence u/r 46 A of Income Tax Rules against unexplained Investment Merely because of non-furnishing before AO: ITAT [Read Order]")
Assessee could not Produce Evidence before Tribunal due to Judicial Custody: ITAT sets aside Addition of Bank Credits to Income Tax [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside additions made on account of cash deposits and bank credits for Assessment Years (AY) 2019–20 and 2020–21, noting that...
![Assessee could not Produce Evidence before Tribunal due to Judicial Custody: ITAT sets aside Addition of Bank Credits to Income Tax [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/500x300_2064490-assessee-could-not-produce-evidence-produce-evidence-evidence-produce-evidence-before-tribunal-due-taxscan.webp "Assessee could not Produce Evidence before Tribunal due to Judicial Custody: ITAT sets aside Addition of Bank Credits to Income Tax [Read Order]")
Disallowance of Related Party Payments u/s 40A(2)(b): ITAT Deletes Additions for AO’s Failure to Prove Excessiveness
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted disallowances made under Section 40A(2)(b) for payments to related parties, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to...
