![Receiving Gifts Before Wedding Date Cannot Be Treated as Ungenuine Without Proof: ITAT Deletes ₹4.31 Lakh Unexplained Cash Deposit Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/19/500x300_2078331-receiving-gifts-before-wedding-date-wedding-gifts-taxscan.webp "Receiving Gifts Before Wedding Date Cannot Be Treated as Ungenuine Without Proof: ITAT Deletes ₹4.31 Lakh Unexplained Cash Deposit Addition [Read Order]")
Receiving Gifts Before Wedding Date Cannot Be Treated as Ungenuine Without Proof: ITAT Deletes ₹4.31 Lakh Unexplained Cash Deposit Addition [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted an addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO), holding that gifts received...
![Factual Dispute on Custody Legal or Proper in Gold Smuggling Case not for Writ Jurisdiction: Telangana HC Directs to Remedy under BNSS [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/10/250x150_2075131-factual-dispute-on-custody-legal-custody-legal-or-proper-in-gold-smuggling-case-taxscan.webp "Factual Dispute on Custody Legal or Proper in Gold Smuggling Case not for Writ Jurisdiction: Telangana HC Directs to Remedy under BNSS [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Dept Could not Place alleged accommodation entries which led to Addition u/s 69A: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/31/250x150_2071599-income-tax-dept-income-tax-dept-could-not-place-alleged-accommodation-entries-taxscan.webp "Income Tax Dept Could not Place alleged accommodation entries which led to Addition u/s 69A: ITAT dismisses Appeal [Read Order]")
![₹1.5 Crore Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Deletion of Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/28/250x150_2070083-treated-as-unexplained-cash-credit-unexplained-cash-credit-unexplained-cash-tascan.webp "₹1.5 Crore Treated as Unexplained Cash Credit u/s 68: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)’s Deletion of Addition [Read Order]")
![Income Addition Based on Third-Party Disclosure Without Evidence Not Sustainable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/24/250x150_2068575-itat-income-addition-disclosure-taxscan.webp "Income Addition Based on Third-Party Disclosure Without Evidence Not Sustainable: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Tender Scam: Jharkhand HC rejects Bail Plea of Ex-Minister in PMLA Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/21/500x300_2066798-tender-scam-jharkhand-hc-jharkhand-hc-rejects-bail-plea-rejection-of-bail-plea-taxscan.webp "Tender Scam: Jharkhand HC rejects Bail Plea of Ex-Minister in PMLA Case [Read Order]")
CIT(A) cannot Reject Additional evidence u/r 46 A of Income Tax Rules against unexplained Investment Merely because of non-furnishing before AO: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee to furnish the additional evidence under rule 46 A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 before the Assessing Officer...
![CIT(A) cannot Reject Additional evidence u/r 46 A of Income Tax Rules against unexplained Investment Merely because of non-furnishing before AO: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/17/500x300_2064739-cita-cita-cannot-reject-additional-evidence-evidence-section-46-a-of-income-tax-rules-taxscan.webp "CIT(A) cannot Reject Additional evidence u/r 46 A of Income Tax Rules against unexplained Investment Merely because of non-furnishing before AO: ITAT [Read Order]")
Assessee could not Produce Evidence before Tribunal due to Judicial Custody: ITAT sets aside Addition of Bank Credits to Income Tax [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside additions made on account of cash deposits and bank credits for Assessment Years (AY) 2019–20 and 2020–21, noting that...
![Assessee could not Produce Evidence before Tribunal due to Judicial Custody: ITAT sets aside Addition of Bank Credits to Income Tax [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/500x300_2064490-assessee-could-not-produce-evidence-produce-evidence-evidence-produce-evidence-before-tribunal-due-taxscan.webp "Assessee could not Produce Evidence before Tribunal due to Judicial Custody: ITAT sets aside Addition of Bank Credits to Income Tax [Read Order]")
Disallowance of Related Party Payments u/s 40A(2)(b): ITAT Deletes Additions for AO’s Failure to Prove Excessiveness
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted disallowances made under Section 40A(2)(b) for payments to related parties, holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to...
Tribunal Cannot Interfere with Decision of Original Authority w/out Evidence, Illogicality, or Procedural Impropriety: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Tribunal observed that its role in disciplinary matters is limited and does not extend to substituting its own view for that of the original authority.The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and...
![Tribunal Cannot Interfere with Decision of Original Authority w/out Evidence, Illogicality, or Procedural Impropriety: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/23/500x300_2053356-cestat-taxscan.webp "Tribunal Cannot Interfere with Decision of Original Authority w/out Evidence, Illogicality, or Procedural Impropriety: CESTAT [Read Order]")
ITAT Deletes ₹1.2 Crore Addition, Cites Lack of Evidence in Jewellery Stock Discrepancy Case [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jaipur Bench, has ruled in favor of a Jewellery deleting additions of over ₹1.2 crore made by the tax department due to alleged discrepancies in cash and...
![ITAT Deletes ₹1.2 Crore Addition, Cites Lack of Evidence in Jewellery Stock Discrepancy Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/12/500x300_2042918-itat-itat-jaipur-jwellery-stock-lack-of-evidence-taxscan.webp "ITAT Deletes ₹1.2 Crore Addition, Cites Lack of Evidence in Jewellery Stock Discrepancy Case [Read Order]")