![CIT(A) cannot Reject Additional evidence u/r 46 A of Income Tax Rules against unexplained Investment Merely because of non-furnishing before AO: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/17/500x300_2064739-cita-cita-cannot-reject-additional-evidence-evidence-section-46-a-of-income-tax-rules-taxscan.webp "CIT(A) cannot Reject Additional evidence u/r 46 A of Income Tax Rules against unexplained Investment Merely because of non-furnishing before AO: ITAT [Read Order]")
CIT(A) cannot Reject Additional evidence u/r 46 A of Income Tax Rules against unexplained Investment Merely because of non-furnishing before AO: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee to furnish the additional evidence under rule 46 A of the Income...
![Assessee could not Produce Evidence before Tribunal due to Judicial Custody: ITAT sets aside Addition of Bank Credits to Income Tax [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/250x150_2064490-assessee-could-not-produce-evidence-produce-evidence-evidence-produce-evidence-before-tribunal-due-taxscan.webp "Assessee could not Produce Evidence before Tribunal due to Judicial Custody: ITAT sets aside Addition of Bank Credits to Income Tax [Read Order]")
![Tribunal Cannot Interfere with Decision of Original Authority w/out Evidence, Illogicality, or Procedural Impropriety: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/23/250x150_2053356-cestat-taxscan.webp "Tribunal Cannot Interfere with Decision of Original Authority w/out Evidence, Illogicality, or Procedural Impropriety: CESTAT [Read Order]")
ITAT Deletes ₹1.2 Crore Addition, Cites Lack of Evidence in Jewellery Stock Discrepancy Case [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Jaipur Bench, has ruled in favor of a Jewellery deleting additions of over ₹1.2 crore made by the tax department due to alleged discrepancies in cash and...
![ITAT Deletes ₹1.2 Crore Addition, Cites Lack of Evidence in Jewellery Stock Discrepancy Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/12/500x300_2042918-itat-itat-jaipur-jwellery-stock-lack-of-evidence-taxscan.webp "ITAT Deletes ₹1.2 Crore Addition, Cites Lack of Evidence in Jewellery Stock Discrepancy Case [Read Order]")
₹278.67 Crore Addition on Ex-Andhra CM Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy Scrapped by ITAT Over Insufficient Evidence [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has struck down an addition of ₹278.67 crores imposed on former Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy. The tribunal...
![₹278.67 Crore Addition on Ex-Andhra CM Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy Scrapped by ITAT Over Insufficient Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Ex-Andhra-CM-Y.S.-Jagan-Mohan-Reddy-ITAT-Addition-on-Ex-Andhra-CM-taxscan.jpg "₹278.67 Crore Addition on Ex-Andhra CM Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy Scrapped by ITAT Over Insufficient Evidence [Read Order]")
Rs. 1.19 Crore Unexplained Cash Deposits Dispute: ITAT allows Cash Flow Statement as New Evidence and directs Reassessment [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) allowed the assessee to submit a new cash flow statement as evidence and directed the Assessing Officer ( AO ) to reassess the matter...
![Rs. 1.19 Crore Unexplained Cash Deposits Dispute: ITAT allows Cash Flow Statement as New Evidence and directs Reassessment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedadad-Reassessment-Cash-Deposits-Taxscan.jpg "Rs. 1.19 Crore Unexplained Cash Deposits Dispute: ITAT allows Cash Flow Statement as New Evidence and directs Reassessment [Read Order]")
ITAT sets aside additions on Penny Stock gains, directs deletion of Related Expenses due to Lack of Evidence [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the additions made on penny stock gains and related expenses due to lack of evidence on the part of the...
![ITAT sets aside additions on Penny Stock gains, directs deletion of Related Expenses due to Lack of Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Penny-Stock-Expenses-Due-to-Lack-of-Evidence-Penny-Stock-gains-taxscan.jpg "ITAT sets aside additions on Penny Stock gains, directs deletion of Related Expenses due to Lack of Evidence [Read Order]")
ITAT upholds CIT(A) Ruling on Accounting Manipulation and Tax Evasion Due to Insufficient Evidence [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) upheld the ruling of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] regarding accounting manipulation and tax evasion due to insufficient...
![ITAT upholds CIT(A) Ruling on Accounting Manipulation and Tax Evasion Due to Insufficient Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-Accounting-Manipulation-Tax-Evasion-Insufficient-Evidence-taxscan.jpg "ITAT upholds CIT(A) Ruling on Accounting Manipulation and Tax Evasion Due to Insufficient Evidence [Read Order]")
Additional Evidences in GST Appellate Tribunal Appeal: A Guide Under Rule 112 of Central GST Rules
When filing an appeal before the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Authority or the GST Appellate Tribunal (GST) under the Goods and Services Tax Act, it is essential to understand and comply with the...
![Non-Filing of Evidence: ITAT upholds Addition of Sundry Creditors Balances [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-Sundry-Creditors-Balances-Non-Filing-of-Evidence-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Filing of Evidence: ITAT upholds Addition of Sundry Creditors Balances [Read Order]")