![Tribunal Cannot Interfere with Decision of Original Authority w/out Evidence, Illogicality, or Procedural Impropriety: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/23/500x300_2053356-cestat-taxscan.webp "Tribunal Cannot Interfere with Decision of Original Authority w/out Evidence, Illogicality, or Procedural Impropriety: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Tribunal Cannot Interfere with Decision of Original Authority w/out Evidence, Illogicality, or Procedural Impropriety: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Tribunal observed that its role in disciplinary matters is limited and does not extend to substituting its own view for that of the original...
![ITAT Deletes ₹1.2 Crore Addition, Cites Lack of Evidence in Jewellery Stock Discrepancy Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/12/250x150_2042918-itat-itat-jaipur-jwellery-stock-lack-of-evidence-taxscan.webp "ITAT Deletes ₹1.2 Crore Addition, Cites Lack of Evidence in Jewellery Stock Discrepancy Case [Read Order]")
![₹278.67 Crore Addition on Ex-Andhra CM Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy Scrapped by ITAT Over Insufficient Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Ex-Andhra-CM-Y.S.-Jagan-Mohan-Reddy-ITAT-Addition-on-Ex-Andhra-CM-taxscan.jpg "₹278.67 Crore Addition on Ex-Andhra CM Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy Scrapped by ITAT Over Insufficient Evidence [Read Order]")
![Rs. 1.19 Crore Unexplained Cash Deposits Dispute: ITAT allows Cash Flow Statement as New Evidence and directs Reassessment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedadad-Reassessment-Cash-Deposits-Taxscan.jpg "Rs. 1.19 Crore Unexplained Cash Deposits Dispute: ITAT allows Cash Flow Statement as New Evidence and directs Reassessment [Read Order]")
![ITAT sets aside additions on Penny Stock gains, directs deletion of Related Expenses due to Lack of Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Mumbai-Penny-Stock-Expenses-Due-to-Lack-of-Evidence-Penny-Stock-gains-taxscan.jpg "ITAT sets aside additions on Penny Stock gains, directs deletion of Related Expenses due to Lack of Evidence [Read Order]")
ITAT upholds CIT(A) Ruling on Accounting Manipulation and Tax Evasion Due to Insufficient Evidence [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) upheld the ruling of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] regarding accounting manipulation and tax evasion due to insufficient...
![ITAT upholds CIT(A) Ruling on Accounting Manipulation and Tax Evasion Due to Insufficient Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-Accounting-Manipulation-Tax-Evasion-Insufficient-Evidence-taxscan.jpg "ITAT upholds CIT(A) Ruling on Accounting Manipulation and Tax Evasion Due to Insufficient Evidence [Read Order]")
Additional Evidences in GST Appellate Tribunal Appeal: A Guide Under Rule 112 of Central GST Rules
When filing an appeal before the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Authority or the GST Appellate Tribunal (GST) under the Goods and Services Tax Act, it is essential to understand and comply with the...
![Non-Filing of Evidence: ITAT upholds Addition of Sundry Creditors Balances [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-Sundry-Creditors-Balances-Non-Filing-of-Evidence-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Filing of Evidence: ITAT upholds Addition of Sundry Creditors Balances [Read Order]")
AO Levied Penalty u/s 271AAB for Alleged Undisclosed Income during Search: ITAT deletes Penalty due to Lack of Clear Evidence [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted the penalty levied under Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for alleged undisclosed income during the search. The...
![AO Levied Penalty u/s 271AAB for Alleged Undisclosed Income during Search: ITAT deletes Penalty due to Lack of Clear Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Section-271AAB-of-the-Income-Tax-Act-Evidence-Undisclosed-Income-Taxscann.jpg "AO Levied Penalty u/s 271AAB for Alleged Undisclosed Income during Search: ITAT deletes Penalty due to Lack of Clear Evidence [Read Order]")
Relief to Hindustan Inox: CESTAT quashes Customs Penalty u/s 114AA imposed w/o Evidence [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has provided significant relief to Hindustan Inox Limited by quashing the penalties imposed under Section 114AA of the Customs Act,...
![Relief to Hindustan Inox: CESTAT quashes Customs Penalty u/s 114AA imposed w/o Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Hindustan-Inox-CESTAT-Customs-Penalty-section-114AA-Evidence-Customs-Penalty-CESTAT-quashes-Customs-Penalty-cestat-on-Hindustan-Inox-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Hindustan Inox: CESTAT quashes Customs Penalty u/s 114AA imposed w/o Evidence [Read Order]")
![Non-Filing of Evidence for Income from Other Sources: ITAT upholds Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Evidence-for-Income-from-Other-Sources-Evidence-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Filing of Evidence for Income from Other Sources: ITAT upholds Addition [Read Order]")
Failure to Submit Oral or Document Evidence confirms GST Liability: Madras HC remands for Reconsideration [Read Order]
The Madras High Court remanded the order confirming the GST liability due to failure to submit oral or document evidence. The matter was remanded for reconsideration on 10% pre-deposit. Jai Maa...
![Failure to Submit Oral or Document Evidence confirms GST Liability: Madras HC remands for Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Submit-Oral-Document-Evidence-GST-Liability-Madras-HC-Reconsideration-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Submit Oral or Document Evidence confirms GST Liability: Madras HC remands for Reconsideration [Read Order]")