![AO Levied Penalty u/s 271AAB for Alleged Undisclosed Income during Search: ITAT deletes Penalty due to Lack of Clear Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Section-271AAB-of-the-Income-Tax-Act-Evidence-Undisclosed-Income-Taxscann.jpg "AO Levied Penalty u/s 271AAB for Alleged Undisclosed Income during Search: ITAT deletes Penalty due to Lack of Clear Evidence [Read Order]")
AO Levied Penalty u/s 271AAB for Alleged Undisclosed Income during Search: ITAT deletes Penalty due to Lack of Clear Evidence [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted the penalty levied under Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for alleged...
![Relief to Hindustan Inox: CESTAT quashes Customs Penalty u/s 114AA imposed w/o Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Hindustan-Inox-CESTAT-Customs-Penalty-section-114AA-Evidence-Customs-Penalty-CESTAT-quashes-Customs-Penalty-cestat-on-Hindustan-Inox-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Hindustan Inox: CESTAT quashes Customs Penalty u/s 114AA imposed w/o Evidence [Read Order]")
![Non-Filing of Evidence for Income from Other Sources: ITAT upholds Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Evidence-for-Income-from-Other-Sources-Evidence-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Filing of Evidence for Income from Other Sources: ITAT upholds Addition [Read Order]")
![Failure to Submit Oral or Document Evidence confirms GST Liability: Madras HC remands for Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Submit-Oral-Document-Evidence-GST-Liability-Madras-HC-Reconsideration-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Submit Oral or Document Evidence confirms GST Liability: Madras HC remands for Reconsideration [Read Order]")
![Taxpayer Substantiates Cash Deposit Source with Sufficient Evidence: ITAT Deletes Addition of 28 lakhs [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/WhatsApp-Image-2024-05-09-at-11.33.42-AM-1.jpeg "Taxpayer Substantiates Cash Deposit Source with Sufficient Evidence: ITAT Deletes Addition of 28 lakhs [Read Order]")
Findings of Expert regarding disablement is acceptable in absence of Contrary Evidence for Claim of Insurance: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court held that the findings of experts regarding disablement are acceptable in the absence of contrary evidence for a claim of insurance. The disability certificate is acceptable...
Taxpayer can give Opportunity to Furnish Critical Additional Evidence before Completing Assessment u/s 144: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that taxpayers can be allowed to furnish critical additional evidence before completing an assessment under section 144 of...
![Taxpayer can give Opportunity to Furnish Critical Additional Evidence before Completing Assessment u/s 144: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ITAT-Chandigarh-ITAT-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-ruling-on-taxpayer-evidence-Taxscan.jpg "Taxpayer can give Opportunity to Furnish Critical Additional Evidence before Completing Assessment u/s 144: ITAT [Read Order]")
Evidence from Panch Witnesses without Allowing Cross Examination is not valid: CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Excise Act [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) viewed that evidence from panch witnesses without allowing cross examination is not valid and set aside the penalty...
![Evidence from Panch Witnesses without Allowing Cross Examination is not valid: CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Excise Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CESTAT-Mumbai-Panch-witnesses-Excise-Act-penalty-cross-examination-Evidence-from-Panch-Witnesses-TAXSCAN.jpg "Evidence from Panch Witnesses without Allowing Cross Examination is not valid: CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Excise Act [Read Order]")
![Non-Acceptance of Fresh Evidence u/r 46A: ITAT remands Income Tax Appeal to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Evidence-Non-Acceptance-of-Fresh-Evidence-ITAT-Income-Tax-Appeal-CITA-ITAT-remands-Income-Tax-Appeal-to-CITA-taxscan.jpg "Non-Acceptance of Fresh Evidence u/r 46A: ITAT remands Income Tax Appeal to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
CESTAT Quashes Penalty u/s 117 of Customs Act on ground of Absence of Direct Evidence of Connivance [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the penalty imposed under section 117 of the Customs Act,1962 on the grounds of the absence of direct...
![CESTAT Quashes Penalty u/s 117 of Customs Act on ground of Absence of Direct Evidence of Connivance [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Penalty-Customs-Act-Absence-Direct-Evidence-Connivance-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT Quashes Penalty u/s 117 of Customs Act on ground of Absence of Direct Evidence of Connivance [Read Order]")
Service Tax Demand on Fabrication works for Indian Railway without any corroborative Evidence : CESTAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) directed re-adjudication to the adjudicating authority for the imposition of service tax demand on fabrication...
![Service Tax Demand on Fabrication works for Indian Railway without any corroborative Evidence : CESTAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Demand-Fabrication-Fabrication-works-Indian-Railway-Service-Tax-Demand-on-Fabrication-works-for-Indian-Railway-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Demand on Fabrication works for Indian Railway without any corroborative Evidence : CESTAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]")
Failure to produce Evidence in support of Claim of Credit Liabilities towards Labour Groups: ITAT upholds Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Visakhapatnam bench held that the assessee failed to produce evidence in support of the claim of credit liabilities towards labor groups. Therefore, the...
![Failure to produce Evidence in support of Claim of Credit Liabilities towards Labour Groups: ITAT upholds Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Failure-to-produce-evidence-Credit-Liabilities-towards-Labour-Groups-ITAT-upholds-Disallowance-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Failure to produce Evidence in support of Claim of Credit Liabilities towards Labour Groups: ITAT upholds Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")