![Taxpayer can give Opportunity to Furnish Critical Additional Evidence before Completing Assessment u/s 144: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ITAT-Chandigarh-ITAT-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-ruling-on-taxpayer-evidence-Taxscan.jpg "Taxpayer can give Opportunity to Furnish Critical Additional Evidence before Completing Assessment u/s 144: ITAT [Read Order]")
Taxpayer can give Opportunity to Furnish Critical Additional Evidence before Completing Assessment u/s 144: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that taxpayers can be allowed to furnish critical additional evidence...
![Evidence from Panch Witnesses without Allowing Cross Examination is not valid: CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Excise Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CESTAT-Mumbai-Panch-witnesses-Excise-Act-penalty-cross-examination-Evidence-from-Panch-Witnesses-TAXSCAN.jpg "Evidence from Panch Witnesses without Allowing Cross Examination is not valid: CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Excise Act [Read Order]")
![Non-Acceptance of Fresh Evidence u/r 46A: ITAT remands Income Tax Appeal to CIT(A) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Evidence-Non-Acceptance-of-Fresh-Evidence-ITAT-Income-Tax-Appeal-CITA-ITAT-remands-Income-Tax-Appeal-to-CITA-taxscan.jpg "Non-Acceptance of Fresh Evidence u/r 46A: ITAT remands Income Tax Appeal to CIT(A) [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Quashes Penalty u/s 117 of Customs Act on ground of Absence of Direct Evidence of Connivance [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CESTAT-Penalty-Customs-Act-Absence-Direct-Evidence-Connivance-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT Quashes Penalty u/s 117 of Customs Act on ground of Absence of Direct Evidence of Connivance [Read Order]")
![Service Tax Demand on Fabrication works for Indian Railway without any corroborative Evidence : CESTAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Demand-Fabrication-Fabrication-works-Indian-Railway-Service-Tax-Demand-on-Fabrication-works-for-Indian-Railway-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Demand on Fabrication works for Indian Railway without any corroborative Evidence : CESTAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]")
Failure to produce Evidence in support of Claim of Credit Liabilities towards Labour Groups: ITAT upholds Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Visakhapatnam bench held that the assessee failed to produce evidence in support of the claim of credit liabilities towards labor groups. Therefore, the...
![Failure to produce Evidence in support of Claim of Credit Liabilities towards Labour Groups: ITAT upholds Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Failure-to-produce-evidence-Credit-Liabilities-towards-Labour-Groups-ITAT-upholds-Disallowance-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Failure to produce Evidence in support of Claim of Credit Liabilities towards Labour Groups: ITAT upholds Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Statement made before Customs officials Not Recorded u/s 161 of Crpc can be used as Substantive Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that a statement made before the Customs officials that was not recorded under Section 161 of the Criminal...
![Statement made before Customs officials Not Recorded u/s 161 of Crpc can be used as Substantive Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Statement-Customs-officials-Not-Recorded-Crpc-Substantive-Evidence-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Statement made before Customs officials Not Recorded u/s 161 of Crpc can be used as Substantive Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Denial of export benefits merely due to non-availability of International Private Leased Circuit connection when the evidence for rendering of services are established, is not justified: ITAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that Denial of export benefits merely due to non-availability of International Private Leased Circuit connection when the evidence...
![Denial of export benefits merely due to non-availability of International Private Leased Circuit connection when the evidence for rendering of services are established, is not justified: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Denial-export-benefits-non-availability-Circuit-connection-evidence-for-rendering-taxscan.jpg "Denial of export benefits merely due to non-availability of International Private Leased Circuit connection when the evidence for rendering of services are established, is not justified: ITAT [Read Order]")
Assessment Order passed without Proper Examination of Evidence shall be erroneous and prejudicial to Interest of Revenue: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the assessment order passed without proper examination of evidence shall be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the...
![Assessment Order passed without Proper Examination of Evidence shall be erroneous and prejudicial to Interest of Revenue: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Assessment-Order-Proper-Examination-Evidence-erroneous-prejudicial-Interest-Revenue-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Assessment Order passed without Proper Examination of Evidence shall be erroneous and prejudicial to Interest of Revenue: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT Confirms Income Tax Addition u/s 68 in Absence of Evidence Proving Unsubstantial Increase in Business Capital [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) confirms the Income Tax addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in the absence of evidence proving the unsubstantial...
![ITAT Confirms Income Tax Addition u/s 68 in Absence of Evidence Proving Unsubstantial Increase in Business Capital [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ITAT-Confirms-Income-Tax-Addition-ITAT-Absence-of-Evidence-Income-Tax-Addition-Income-Tax-Business-Capital-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Confirms Income Tax Addition u/s 68 in Absence of Evidence Proving Unsubstantial Increase in Business Capital [Read Order]")
Bogus Purchase, Claim of Expense Denied without Corroborative Evidence:Â Delhi HC quashes Reassessment Order [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court quashed the reassessment as alleging a Bogus Purchase, the claim of expense denied without corroborative evidence. Mr Shlok Chandra, learned senior standing counsel, accepts...
![Bogus Purchase, Claim of Expense Denied without Corroborative Evidence:Â Delhi HC quashes Reassessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Bogus-Purchase-Claim-of-Expense-Expense-Claim-Corroborative-Evidence-taxscan.jpg "Bogus Purchase, Claim of Expense Denied without Corroborative Evidence:Â Delhi HC quashes Reassessment Order [Read Order]")
Non-Consideration of Evidence on Deduction Claim u/s 54B and Capital Gains Exemption on Sale of Agricultural Land: ITAT remands Matter to AO [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Chennai bench remanded the matter before the Assessing officer for re adjudication due to nonconsideration of evidence on deduction claimed under...
![Non-Consideration of Evidence on Deduction Claim u/s 54B and Capital Gains Exemption on Sale of Agricultural Land: ITAT remands Matter to AO [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Non-Consideration-Evidence-Deduction-Claim-Capital-Gains-Exemption-Sale-of-Agricultural-Land-ITAT-remands-Matter-AO-taxscan.jpg "Non-Consideration of Evidence on Deduction Claim u/s 54B and Capital Gains Exemption on Sale of Agricultural Land: ITAT remands Matter to AO [Read Order]")