![AO cannot step in the shoes of businessman to decide curtailing of excessive expenditure unless brought evidence of fraud: ITAT deletes addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/shoes-of-businessman-curtailing-of-excessive-expenditure-evidence-of-fraud-ITAT-deletes-addition-taxscan-.jpg "AO cannot step in the shoes of businessman to decide curtailing of excessive expenditure unless brought evidence of fraud: ITAT deletes addition [Read Order]")
AO cannot step in the shoes of businessman to decide curtailing of excessive expenditure unless brought evidence of fraud: ITAT deletes addition [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that Adoption of value by AO on the date of transfer being hypothetical makes the...
![Failure to submit Evidence towards Legitimacy of Transaction: CESTAT upholds Confiscation of Betel Nuts [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Failure-to-submit-Evidence-Evidence-Legitimacy-of-Transaction-Transaction-CESTAT-Betel-Nuts-taxscan.jpg "Failure to submit Evidence towards Legitimacy of Transaction: CESTAT upholds Confiscation of Betel Nuts [Read Order]")
![Verification of Prices of Actually Sold Goods not possible in absence of Evidence: CESTAT Remands Matter for Determining Value [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Verification-of-Prices-Actually-Sold-Goods-absence-of-Evidence-CESTAT-Determining-Value-taxscan.jpg "Verification of Prices of Actually Sold Goods not possible in absence of Evidence: CESTAT Remands Matter for Determining Value [Read Order]")
![Charge on Undervaluation of Imported Goods is not Valid as Dept Fails to Produce Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Charge-Undervaluation-of-Imported-Goods-Imported-Goods-Corroborative-Evidence-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Charge on Undervaluation of Imported Goods is not Valid as Dept Fails to Produce Corroborative Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![High Court in its Writ Jurisdiction cannot act as AO to Scrutinise Facts and Evidences: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/High-Court-in-its-Writ-Jurisdiction-High-Court-Writ-Jurisdiction-AO-Scrutinise-Facts-and-Evidences-Scrutinise-Facts-Evidences-Calcutta-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "High Court in its Writ Jurisdiction cannot act as AO to Scrutinise Facts and Evidences: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
Extended Period of Limitation cannot be Invoked unless there is Evidence of Fraud or Collusion or Wilful Misstatement: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), observed that extended period of limitation cannot be invoked unless there is evidence of fraud or collusion or...
![Extended Period of Limitation cannot be Invoked unless there is Evidence of Fraud or Collusion or Wilful Misstatement: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Extended-Period-of-Limitation-Extended-Period-Evidence-of-Fraud-Evidence-Fraud-Collusion-Wilful-Misstatement-Misstatement-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Extended Period of Limitation cannot be Invoked unless there is Evidence of Fraud or Collusion or Wilful Misstatement: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Surrendered Income will be treated as Income from Medical Profession unless there is clear Evidence to the contrary: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that surrendered income will be treated as income from the medical profession unless there is clear evidence to the contrary...
![Surrendered Income will be treated as Income from Medical Profession unless there is clear Evidence to the contrary: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Surrendered-Income-Income-from-Medical-Profession-Evidence-to-the-contrary-Evidence-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Surrendered Income will be treated as Income from Medical Profession unless there is clear Evidence to the contrary: ITAT [Read Order]")
Trial Court should decide GST Fraud case on Evidence Uninfluenced by Observations in Bail Order: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Order]
The Punjab and Haryana High Court observed that Trial Court should decide GST Fraud case on evidence uninfluenced by observations in bail order. The petitioner, Directorate General of Goods and...
![Trial Court should decide GST Fraud case on Evidence Uninfluenced by Observations in Bail Order: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Trial-Court-GST-Fraud-case-GST-Fraud-GST-Evidence-Uninfluenced-by-Observations-in-Bail-Order-Evidence-Bail-Order-Bail-Evidence-Uninfluenced-Punjab-and-Haryana-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Trial Court should decide GST Fraud case on Evidence Uninfluenced by Observations in Bail Order: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Order]")
Addition u/s 69 of Income Tax Act shall not be made on basis of ledger account seized from third party on absence of clinching Evidence of Cash Payments towards Purchase of Flat: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Lucknow bench held that addition under Section 69 of Income Tax Act should not be made on the basis of a ledger account seized from the third party in...
![Addition u/s 69 of Income Tax Act shall not be made on basis of ledger account seized from third party on absence of clinching Evidence of Cash Payments towards Purchase of Flat: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Income-Tax-Act-shall-not-be-made-on-basis-of-ledger-account-seized-from-third-party-absence-of-clinching-evidence-of-Cash-Payments-towards-purchase-of-Flat-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Addition u/s 69 of Income Tax Act shall not be made on basis of ledger account seized from third party on absence of clinching Evidence of Cash Payments towards Purchase of Flat: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT allows 10% of Cash Deposits as Taxable Income in Absence of Evidence of Source u/s 69A of IT Act [Read Order]
The Rajkot bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has allowed only 10% of the cash deposits made by an assessee as taxable income, citing a lack of evidence of the source of the deposits...
![ITAT allows 10% of Cash Deposits as Taxable Income in Absence of Evidence of Source u/s 69A of IT Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ITAT-Cash-Deposits-Taxable-Income-Absence-Evidence-Source-IT-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT allows 10% of Cash Deposits as Taxable Income in Absence of Evidence of Source u/s 69A of IT Act [Read Order]")
No Justification for Further Pre-Trial Incarceration: Punjab and Haryana HC Grants Bail in 4.61 crores Revenue Fraud Case [Read Order]
The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail in 4.61 crores revenue fraud case as there is no justification for further pre-trial incarceration The petitioner, Birender Singh, incarcerated in...
CIT(A) passed Order not on Merits: ITAT Directs Re-Adjudication taking Cognizance of Evidences [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has directed re-adjudication taking cognizance of evidence as the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals (CIT(A)) passed order not on merits. ...
![CIT(A) passed Order not on Merits: ITAT Directs Re-Adjudication taking Cognizance of Evidences [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/CITA-Order-Merits-ITAT-Re-Adjudication-ITAT-Directs-Re-Adjudication-Cognizance-of-Evidences-Cognizance-ITAT-Directs-Re-Adjudication-taking-Cognizance-of-Evidences-Taxscan.jpg "CIT(A) passed Order not on Merits: ITAT Directs Re-Adjudication taking Cognizance of Evidences [Read Order]")