![No Material Evidence to Prove Commission of offences of Money Laundering: Jharkhand HC Grants Bail on bond [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/No-Material-Evidence-to-Prove-Commission-of-offences-of-Money-Laundering-Jharkhand-HC-Grants-Bail-on-bond-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Material Evidence to Prove Commission of offences of Money Laundering: Jharkhand HC Grants Bail on bond [Read Order]")
No Material Evidence to Prove Commission of offences of Money Laundering: Jharkhand HC Grants Bail on bond [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court while entertaining a human trafficking case, granted bail to the petitioner on the grounds that no material evidence was...
![CESTAT Quashes Penalty Imposed on Wilful Suppression with Intent to Evade Excise Duty on ground of Absence of Conclusive Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/CESTAT-Quashes-Penalty-Imposed-Wilful-Suppression-CESTAT-Evade-Excise-Duty-Absence-of-Conclusive-Evidence-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Quashes Penalty Imposed on Wilful Suppression with Intent to Evade Excise Duty on ground of Absence of Conclusive Evidence [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Upholds Revocation of suspension of CHA License on ground of Absence of Conclusive Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/CESTAT-Upholds-Revocation-suspension-of-CHA-License-Conclusive-Evidence-CESTAT-Upholds-Revocation-of-suspension-of-CHA-License-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Upholds Revocation of suspension of CHA License on ground of Absence of Conclusive Evidence [Read Order]")
![Onus to Prove Genuineness of Transaction of Sale of Share not being Bogus not Discharged by Mere Filing of Documentary Evidence: ITAT Confirms Income Tax Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Onus-Prove-Genuiness-Transaction-Sale-Share-Bogus-Documentary-Evidence-ITAT-Income-tax-taxscan.jpg "Onus to Prove Genuineness of Transaction of Sale of Share not being Bogus not Discharged by Mere Filing of Documentary Evidence: ITAT Confirms Income Tax Addition [Read Order]")
Disallowance made by AO due to Non-Submission of Business Vouchers: ITAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]
The Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directed re-adjudication to the assessing officer for the disallowance made on the ground of the nonsubmission of business vouchers. ...
![Disallowance made by AO due to Non-Submission of Business Vouchers: ITAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Disallowance-made-by-AO-due-to-Non-Submission-of-Business-Vouchers-Disallowance-made-by-AO-Disallowance-AO-Business-Vouchers-ITAT-ITAT-Directs-Re-adjudication-Taxscan.jpg "Disallowance made by AO due to Non-Submission of Business Vouchers: ITAT Directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]")
ITAT Deletes Addition on Disallowance of Subcontract Expenses on Ground of Lack of Evidence [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently deleted the addition on disallowance of subcontract expenses on ground of lack of evidence. The appeal was filed by the...
![ITAT Deletes Addition on Disallowance of Subcontract Expenses on Ground of Lack of Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/ITAT-Addition-on-Disallowance-of-Subcontract-Expenses-Lack-of-Evidence-ITAT-Deletes-Addition-Addition-on-Disallowance-of-Subcontract-Expenses-Subcontract-Expenses-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Deletes Addition on Disallowance of Subcontract Expenses on Ground of Lack of Evidence [Read Order]")
![No Addition Based on Evidence not Confronted to Assessee: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/addition-evidence-ITAT-confront-assessee-taxscan.jpg "No Addition Based on Evidence not Confronted to Assessee: ITAT [Read Order]")
Commonality or Common Ownership Without Element of Deceit or Fraud not Sufficient for "Lifting Corporate Veil" & Establishing "Alter Ego": Bombay High Court Distinguishes NYK Line & NYK Theseus Corporation
The High Court of Bombay has delivered a significant ruling on the issue of “lifting the corporate veil”. The Bombay High Court has distinguished NYK Line and NYK Theseus Corporation on the...
No Evidence by Dept to Prove Classification of CAT Cables under General Entry of RVAT Act: Rajasthan HC quashes Tax Board Order [Read Order]
The Rajasthan High Court quashed the tax board order since the department failed to provide the classification of CAT cables under the General Entry of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003. M/s...
![No Evidence by Dept to Prove Classification of CAT Cables under General Entry of RVAT Act: Rajasthan HC quashes Tax Board Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Evidence-Classification-of-CAT-Cables-CAT-Cables-General-Entry-of-RVAT-Act-RVAT-Act-General-Entry-Rajasthan-HC-quashes-Tax-Board-Order-Rajasthan-HC-taxscan.jpg "No Evidence by Dept to Prove Classification of CAT Cables under General Entry of RVAT Act: Rajasthan HC quashes Tax Board Order [Read Order]")
Emails of Supplier not an Authentic Evidence to Prove the Contention of Wrong Supply by Importer: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the emails of the supplier not authentic evidence to prove the contention of wrong supply by the...
![Emails of Supplier not an Authentic Evidence to Prove the Contention of Wrong Supply by Importer: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Emails-of-Supplier-not-an-Authentic-Evidence-to-Prove-the-Contention-of-Wrong-Supply-by-Importer-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Emails of Supplier not an Authentic Evidence to Prove the Contention of Wrong Supply by Importer: CESTAT [Read Order]")