![ITAT Deletes Addition on Disallowance of Subcontract Expenses on Ground of Lack of Evidence [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/ITAT-Addition-on-Disallowance-of-Subcontract-Expenses-Lack-of-Evidence-ITAT-Deletes-Addition-Addition-on-Disallowance-of-Subcontract-Expenses-Subcontract-Expenses-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Deletes Addition on Disallowance of Subcontract Expenses on Ground of Lack of Evidence [Read Order]")
ITAT Deletes Addition on Disallowance of Subcontract Expenses on Ground of Lack of Evidence [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently deleted the addition on disallowance of subcontract expenses on ground of...
![No Addition Based on Evidence not Confronted to Assessee: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/addition-evidence-ITAT-confront-assessee-taxscan.jpg "No Addition Based on Evidence not Confronted to Assessee: ITAT [Read Order]")
![No Evidence by Dept to Prove Classification of CAT Cables under General Entry of RVAT Act: Rajasthan HC quashes Tax Board Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Evidence-Classification-of-CAT-Cables-CAT-Cables-General-Entry-of-RVAT-Act-RVAT-Act-General-Entry-Rajasthan-HC-quashes-Tax-Board-Order-Rajasthan-HC-taxscan.jpg "No Evidence by Dept to Prove Classification of CAT Cables under General Entry of RVAT Act: Rajasthan HC quashes Tax Board Order [Read Order]")
Emails of Supplier not an Authentic Evidence to Prove the Contention of Wrong Supply by Importer: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the emails of the supplier not authentic evidence to prove the contention of wrong supply by the...
![Emails of Supplier not an Authentic Evidence to Prove the Contention of Wrong Supply by Importer: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Emails-of-Supplier-not-an-Authentic-Evidence-to-Prove-the-Contention-of-Wrong-Supply-by-Importer-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Emails of Supplier not an Authentic Evidence to Prove the Contention of Wrong Supply by Importer: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No evidence proves Unjust enrichment, Refund of Excess Paid Duty must be Credit to Consumer Welfare Fund: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT)has held that refund of excess paid duty must be credited to the consumer welfare fund in the absence of...
![No evidence proves Unjust enrichment, Refund of Excess Paid Duty must be Credit to Consumer Welfare Fund: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/No-evidence-proves-Unjust-enrichment-Refund-of-Excess-Paid-Duty-must-be-Credit-to-Consumer-Welfare-Fund-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No evidence proves Unjust enrichment, Refund of Excess Paid Duty must be Credit to Consumer Welfare Fund: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Failure to Produce Evidence as to Astronomical Agricultural Income: ITAT upholds Estimation of Income by AO as Other Source [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the estimation of Income by the Assessing Officer as income from other sources as the assessee had failed to produce the...
![Failure to Produce Evidence as to Astronomical Agricultural Income: ITAT upholds Estimation of Income by AO as Other Source [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Evidence-Astronomical-Agricultural-Income-Agricultural-Income-Income-ITAT-upholds-Estimation-of-Income-ITAT-Estimation-of-Income-Other-Source-Taxscan.jpg "Failure to Produce Evidence as to Astronomical Agricultural Income: ITAT upholds Estimation of Income by AO as Other Source [Read Order]")
Addition of loan Amount as Outstanding Balance without Proper Evidence and Documents: ITAT directs AO to Re-adjudicate [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has directed the Assessing Officer to re-adjudicate the case regarding the addition of a loan amount as an outstanding balance. The...
![Addition of loan Amount as Outstanding Balance without Proper Evidence and Documents: ITAT directs AO to Re-adjudicate [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/loan-Amount-as-Outstanding-Balance-Proper-Evidence-Documents-ITAT-Re-adjudicate-Addition-of-loan-Amount-taxscan.jpg "Addition of loan Amount as Outstanding Balance without Proper Evidence and Documents: ITAT directs AO to Re-adjudicate [Read Order]")
Claim of Return of Stock from CD Without any Solid Documentary Evidence is invalid: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the claim return of stock from the Corporate Debtor (CD) without any solid documentary evidence is invalid. ...
Source of Cash Deposit During Demonetization Cannot be Brushed Aside without Evidence to Contrary: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the addition holding that the source of cash deposit during demonetization could not be brushed aside without evidence to the...
![Source of Cash Deposit During Demonetization Cannot be Brushed Aside without Evidence to Contrary: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Source-of-Cash-Deposit-During-Demonetization-Source-of-Cash-Deposit-Cash-Deposit-Demonetization-Evidence-ITAT-deletes-Addition-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Source of Cash Deposit During Demonetization Cannot be Brushed Aside without Evidence to Contrary: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]")
Appeal not barred by Limitation in absence of Material Evidence to prove the Order Passed Date and Served Date as same: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that appeal is not barred by limitation in the absence of material evidence to prove the order passed...
![Appeal not barred by Limitation in absence of Material Evidence to prove the Order Passed Date and Served Date as same: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Appeal-absence-of-Material-Evidence-Order-Passed-Date-Served-Date-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Appeal not barred by Limitation in absence of Material Evidence to prove the Order Passed Date and Served Date as same: CESTAT [Read Order]")