![Delay in Filing Appeal due to the Issuance of Notice on Incorrect Address, Rejection of Appeal Memo not tenable: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Delay-in-Filing-Appeal-Filing-Appeal-Appeal-Issuance-of-Notice-Appeal-Memo-Jharkhand-Highcourt-taxscan.jpg "Delay in Filing Appeal due to the Issuance of Notice on Incorrect Address, Rejection of Appeal Memo not tenable: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]")
Delay in Filing Appeal due to the Issuance of Notice on Incorrect Address, Rejection of Appeal Memo not tenable: Jharkhand HC [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court held that delay in filing the appeal due to the issuance of notice on incorrect address and rejection of appeal memo was not...
![Builder Eligible for Service Tax Refund on Cancellation of Booking by Flat Buyer: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Service-Tax-Refund-Cancellation-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Builder Eligible for Service Tax Refund on Cancellation of Booking by Flat Buyer: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No Service Tax Liability on Intermediary in Sale of Space/ Time for Media Agency on Commission Basis as “Advertising Agency”: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Service-Tax-Liability-Intermediary-in-Sale-of-Space-Time-Media-Agency-Commission-Advertising-Agency-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "No Service Tax Liability on Intermediary in Sale of Space/ Time for Media Agency on Commission Basis as “Advertising Agency”: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Software Activation Services are not Business Auxiliary Services: CESTAT deletes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Software-Activation-Services-Business-Auxiliary-Services-CESTAT-Service-Tax-Demand-Taxscan.jpg "Software Activation Services are not Business Auxiliary Services: CESTAT deletes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![Failure to consider Evidences relating to Availment of Cenvat Credit: CESTAT quashes Recovery [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/evidences-Cenvat-Credit-availment-of-Cenvat-Credit-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Failure to consider Evidences relating to Availment of Cenvat Credit: CESTAT quashes Recovery [Read Order]")
Sec 11B of Central Excise Act not applicable when Payment of Service Tax is by Mistake: CESTAT [Read Order]
A Single Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), ruled that Section 11B of Central Excise Act not applicable when payment of service tax is by mistake. The...
![Sec 11B of Central Excise Act not applicable when Payment of Service Tax is by Mistake: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Central-Excise-Act-Payment-of-Service-Tax-Payment-Service-Tax-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Sec 11B of Central Excise Act not applicable when Payment of Service Tax is by Mistake: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CBEC has No Power to modify Scope of Exemption notification issued by Central Government: CESTAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), ruled that Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) has no power to modify scope of exemption notification...
![CBEC has No Power to modify Scope of Exemption notification issued by Central Government: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/CBEC-Central-Government-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "CBEC has No Power to modify Scope of Exemption notification issued by Central Government: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Penalties imposed u/s 77 and 78 are not valid in the absence of deliberate suppression of fact: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Penalties imposed u/s 77 and 78 are not valid in the absence of deliberate suppression of fact. ...
![Penalties imposed u/s 77 and 78 are not valid in the absence of deliberate suppression of fact: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Penalties-u-s-77-and-78-absence-of-deliberate-suppression-of-fact-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalties imposed u/s 77 and 78 are not valid in the absence of deliberate suppression of fact: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court to decide Applicability of Service Tax on Secondment of Employees [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Supreme-Court-Service-Tax-Employees-taxscan.jpeg "Supreme Court to decide Applicability of Service Tax on Secondment of Employees [Read Order]")
![Clarifying Circulars acts retrospectively: Gauhati High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Clarifying-Circulars-acts-Gauhati-High-Court-Taxscan.jpeg "Clarifying Circulars acts retrospectively: Gauhati High Court [Read Order]")