Dept not Object to Condonation of Delay in filing Appeal: Madras HC Grants 3 Weeks Extension for filing Statutory Appeal [Read Order]
Madras High Court in a recent case granted 3 week time for filing a statutory appeal, since the department not objected to condone the delay in...
![Setback to Saubhagya Tilak Hotels: CESTAT confirms Demand of Service Tax on Mandap Keeper Service [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/CESTAT-Setback-to-Saubhagya-Tilak-Hotels-Saubhagya-Tilak-Hotels-Demand-of-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Mandap-Keeper-Service-Demand-of-Service-Tax-on-Mandap-Keeper-Service-taxscan-.jpg "Setback to Saubhagya Tilak Hotels: CESTAT confirms Demand of Service Tax on Mandap Keeper Service [Read Order]")
![No Service Tax Demand when completion certificate issued before July 01 2010: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Service-Tax-Demand-Service-Tax-completion-certificate-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Service Tax Demand when completion certificate issued before July 01 2010: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Works Contract Service Prior to 01.06.2007 cannot be levied with Service Tax: CESTAT Reiterates Order of SC [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) reiterated the order of the Supreme Court (SC) wherein it was held the works contract service prior to...
![Works Contract Service Prior to 01.06.2007 cannot be levied with Service Tax: CESTAT Reiterates Order of SC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Works-Contract-Service-Works-Contract-service-tax-CESTAT-order-of-Supremecourt-taxscan.jpg "Works Contract Service Prior to 01.06.2007 cannot be levied with Service Tax: CESTAT Reiterates Order of SC [Read Order]")
![Commissioner(Appeal) cant go beyond the Scope SCN demanding Service Tax: CESTATÂ [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/CommissionerAppeal-Scope-SCN-Service-Tax-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Commissioner(Appeal) cant go beyond the Scope SCN demanding Service Tax: CESTATÂ [Read Order]")
Excise Appeal filed beyond time limit prescribed under Section 85 (3) not maintainable: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that the excise appeal filed beyond the time limit prescribed under Section 85 (3)of the Finance Act,...
![Excise Appeal filed beyond time limit prescribed under Section 85 (3) not maintainable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Excise-Appeal-Excise-Appeal-CESTAT-Customs-taxscan.jpg "Excise Appeal filed beyond time limit prescribed under Section 85 (3) not maintainable: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Mere Registration as NBFC not enough under Service tax for levy: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Registration-NBFC-NBFC-Registration-Service-tax-for-levy-Service-tax-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Mere Registration as NBFC not enough under Service tax for levy: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 77 and 78 cannot be imposed in absence of Evidence of Suppression of fact to Evade Payment of Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) of Chennai Bench has held that penalty under sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 cannot be imposed in absence of...
![Penalty u/s 77 and 78 cannot be imposed in absence of Evidence of Suppression of fact to Evade Payment of Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Penalty-Evidence-Evade-Payment-of-Tax-Evade-Payment-Tax-Payment-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 77 and 78 cannot be imposed in absence of Evidence of Suppression of fact to Evade Payment of Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Madras HC dismisses Plea against GST Service Tax Demand by A R Rahman, Santhosh Narayan and G V Prakash [Read Order]
The Madras High Court recently rejected the pleas of three well-known music composers, AR Rahman, G V Prakash Kumar, and Santhosh Narayan, who challenged the proceedings initiated by the Commissioner...
![Madras HC dismisses Plea against GST Service Tax Demand by A R Rahman, Santhosh Narayan and G V Prakash [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Madras-HC-GST-Service-Tax-Demand-A-R-Rahman-Santhosh-Narayan-G-V-Prakash-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC dismisses Plea against GST Service Tax Demand by A R Rahman, Santhosh Narayan and G V Prakash [Read Order]")