![[Breaking] Setback to SICPA: Sikkim HC’s Division Bench Overturns Single Bench Ruling on Refund of Unutilised ITC for Closed Business](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/08/500x300_2084602-2080780-gst-refund-gst-pending-appeal-delhi-hc-directs-payment-with-interest-taxscan.webp "[Breaking] Setback to SICPA: Sikkim HC’s Division Bench Overturns Single Bench Ruling on Refund of Unutilised ITC for Closed Business")
[Breaking] Setback to SICPA: Sikkim HC’s Division Bench Overturns Single Bench Ruling on Refund of Unutilised ITC for Closed Business
The Division Bench of the Sikkim High Court has set aside the Single Bench judgment that had directed refund of unutilised Input Tax Credit ( ITC )...
![GST Liability in Construction JDA Arises Only Upon Transfer of Possession or Rights, Not on Execution of Agreement: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/04/250x150_2084070-gst-liability-non-payment-short-payment-tax-on-outward-supplies-madras-hc-reasonable-opportunity-pre-deposit-taxscan.webp "GST Liability in Construction JDA Arises Only Upon Transfer of Possession or Rights, Not on Execution of Agreement: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![Delayed GST ITC Claim: Karnataka HC Holds Reply to SCN Not Necessary when Records available with Dept [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/28/250x150_2081300-gst-itc-karnataka-hc-gst-delayed-itc-claim-taxscan.webp "Delayed GST ITC Claim: Karnataka HC Holds Reply to SCN Not Necessary when Records available with Dept [Read Order]")
![12% vs 18% GST on Works Contract Executed before 2022: Madras HC Directs Contractor to Submit Evidence before Dept for Re-confirming Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/27/250x150_2081054-works-contract-taxscan.webp "12% vs 18% GST on Works Contract Executed before 2022: Madras HC Directs Contractor to Submit Evidence before Dept for Re-confirming Demand [Read Order]")
![Duplicate GST Demand u/s 63 and 73 Issued for Same Period: Orissa HC declares writ Infructuous as Order Rectified to ‘Nil’ by Dept [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/25/250x150_2080331-gst-demand-.webp "Duplicate GST Demand u/s 63 and 73 Issued for Same Period: Orissa HC declares writ Infructuous as Order Rectified to ‘Nil’ by Dept [Read Order]")
GST Order Demand Triples the Proposed Tax in SCN Without Prior Notice: Madras HC sets aside Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has set aside a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) order that demanded over three times the tax proposed in the original show cause notice (SCN), holding that the order was passed...
![GST Order Demand Triples the Proposed Tax in SCN Without Prior Notice: Madras HC sets aside Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/09/500x300_2074720-gst-order-madras-high-court-gst-order-demand-taxscan.webp "GST Order Demand Triples the Proposed Tax in SCN Without Prior Notice: Madras HC sets aside Order [Read Order]")
GST Dept Cannot Send Multiple Notices to Advocates for Client Info in Fraud Cases: Calcutta HC Explains Advocate-Client Privilege
In a recent ruling, the Calcutta High Court held that the GST Department cannot issue multiple notices to advocates seeking client information in connection with GST fraud investigations. The court ...
Lawyer Cannot Be Raided Merely for Representing Clients' Tax Cases: Delhi HC Reprimands GST Dept [Read Order]
The GST Department was warned by the Delhi High Court for harassing a tax lawyer by raiding his offices in relation to a client's alleged GST evasion. It turned out that the lawyer was only...
![Lawyer Cannot Be Raided Merely for Representing Clients Tax Cases: Delhi HC Reprimands GST Dept [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/04/500x300_2072842-lawyer-representing-clients-tax-cases-tax-cases-for-clients-delhi-hc-taxscan.webp "Lawyer Cannot Be Raided Merely for Representing Clients Tax Cases: Delhi HC Reprimands GST Dept [Read Order]")
NCLAT Directs GST Department to Decide on Disposal of Seized Cigarette Stock in Liquidation Case [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, recently directed the Central GST & Central Excise Department to promptly decide on a representation made by the liquidator ...
![NCLAT Directs GST Department to Decide on Disposal of Seized Cigarette Stock in Liquidation Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/30/500x300_2070763-cigarette-stock-liquidation-case.webp "NCLAT Directs GST Department to Decide on Disposal of Seized Cigarette Stock in Liquidation Case [Read Order]")
Reply Must Be Considered Before Passing GST Order: Madras HC grants Relief Despite Reply filed beyond Time Limit Granted by Dept [Read Order]
The Madras High Court sets aside a GST ( goods and services tax ) order passed without consideration of the reply submitted by the assessee, which was filed beyond the time limit granted by the GST...
![Reply Must Be Considered Before Passing GST Order: Madras HC grants Relief Despite Reply filed beyond Time Limit Granted by Dept [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/500x300_2070283-gst-order-quashed-taxscan.webp "Reply Must Be Considered Before Passing GST Order: Madras HC grants Relief Despite Reply filed beyond Time Limit Granted by Dept [Read Order]")
Petition filed against GST Scrutiny Notice alleging it Issued beyond S. 61 : Jharkhand HC directs to file Reply [Read Order]
The Jharkhand High Court has disposed of a writ petition filed challenging a scrutiny notice and consequential show cause notice under the GST ( Goods and Services Tax) Act, by directing the...
![Petition filed against GST Scrutiny Notice alleging it Issued beyond S. 61 : Jharkhand HC directs to file Reply [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/26/500x300_2069284-gst-gst-scrutiny-taxscan.webp "Petition filed against GST Scrutiny Notice alleging it Issued beyond S. 61 : Jharkhand HC directs to file Reply [Read Order]")