![Directors Remain Criminally Liable for Dishonoured Cheques Despite Company Insolvency: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/18/500x300_2097622-cheque-dishonoured-taxscan.webp "Directors Remain Criminally Liable for Dishonoured Cheques Despite Company Insolvency: Orissa HC [Read Order]")
Directors Remain Criminally Liable for Dishonoured Cheques Despite Company Insolvency: Orissa HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Orissa High Court observed that directors of a company cannot escape criminal liability for cheque dishonour merely because...
![NCLAT dismisses personal guarantors appeals against Bank of Baroda, upholds lower courts direction for document inspection [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/15/250x150_2096848-nclat-bank-of-baroda-taxscan.webp "NCLAT dismisses personal guarantors appeals against Bank of Baroda, upholds lower courts direction for document inspection [Read Order]")
![IBC Moratorium Not a Shield for Directors in Cheque Bounce Cases: Bombay HC Sets Aside Discharge Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/13/250x150_2096058-cheque-bounce-case-taxscan.webp "IBC Moratorium Not a Shield for Directors in Cheque Bounce Cases: Bombay HC Sets Aside Discharge Order [Read Order]")
![IBBI Cannot issue General Circular to Bar RP Appointment u/s 34(4)(b) of IBC: NCLAT Sets aside NCLT Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/09/250x150_2095228-nclat-new-delhi-nclt-order-ibbi-taxscan.webp "IBBI Cannot issue General Circular to Bar RP Appointment u/s 34(4)(b) of IBC: NCLAT Sets aside NCLT Order [Read Order]")
![Part Payment by Corporate Debtor Extends Limitation Period for Filing Insolvency Application: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/06/250x150_2094456-nclat-corporate-debtor-part-payment-taxscan.webp "Part Payment by Corporate Debtor Extends Limitation Period for Filing Insolvency Application: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Employees’ State Insurance Amount Lying with Corporate Debtor Not Part of Liquidation Estate: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) at New Delhi recently clarified that the Employees' State Insurance (ESI) amount lying with a corporate debtor during...
![Employees’ State Insurance Amount Lying with Corporate Debtor Not Part of Liquidation Estate: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/07/500x300_2094498-nclat-liquidation-taxscan.webp "Employees’ State Insurance Amount Lying with Corporate Debtor Not Part of Liquidation Estate: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Discretionary right of Tribunal under IBC cannot be used to Impel Financial Creditor to consider Settlement: NCLT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has held that the discretionary right of the tribunal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 cannot be used to Impel...
![Discretionary right of Tribunal under IBC cannot be used to Impel Financial Creditor to consider Settlement: NCLT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/29/500x300_2092467-ibc-nclat.webp "Discretionary right of Tribunal under IBC cannot be used to Impel Financial Creditor to consider Settlement: NCLT [Read Order]")
Directors who Invested ₹5.5 Cr in Corporate Debtor Cannot Claim to be Unaware of CIRP: NCLAT Upholds Denial of Exclusion/Extension [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) recently dismissed an appeal filed by the suspended directors of a corporate debtor, holding that directors who had invested a sum of...
![Directors who Invested ₹5.5 Cr in Corporate Debtor Cannot Claim to be Unaware of CIRP: NCLAT Upholds Denial of Exclusion/Extension [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/21/500x300_2089292-corporate-debtor-cirp-nclat-taxscan.webp "Directors who Invested ₹5.5 Cr in Corporate Debtor Cannot Claim to be Unaware of CIRP: NCLAT Upholds Denial of Exclusion/Extension [Read Order]")
Application under section 7(5) of IBC cannot be Rejected due to non furnishing of NeSL when existence of debt and default by CD is established: NCLT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal(NCLT) has held that application under section 7(5) of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016 (‘the Code’) cannot be...
![Application under section 7(5) of IBC cannot be Rejected due to non furnishing of NeSL when existence of debt and default by CD is established: NCLT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/20/500x300_2089006-nclt-mumbai-nclt-ibc-application-taxscan.webp "Application under section 7(5) of IBC cannot be Rejected due to non furnishing of NeSL when existence of debt and default by CD is established: NCLT [Read Order]")
Contractual Dispute Cloaked as Cheating: Orissa HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Liquidator Citing Pending IBC Proceedings [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Orissa High Court held that a contractual dispute cannot be treated as cheating and granted anticipatory bail to a company liquidator and other officials, taking note of ...
![Contractual Dispute Cloaked as Cheating: Orissa HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Liquidator Citing Pending IBC Proceedings [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/16/500x300_2087927-contractual-dispute-cloaked-cheating-orissa-hc-anticipatory-bail-liquidator-citing-pending-ibc-proceedings-taxscan.webp "Contractual Dispute Cloaked as Cheating: Orissa HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Liquidator Citing Pending IBC Proceedings [Read Order]")
Corporate Applicant’s Own Petition under IBC S. 10 Admitted: NCLT Initiates CIRP on Finding Default Due and Payable Beyond IBC Section 4(1) Threshold [Read Order]
In a recent case, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Mumbai Bench initiated the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate applicant on finding a default due ...
![Corporate Applicant’s Own Petition under IBC S. 10 Admitted: NCLT Initiates CIRP on Finding Default Due and Payable Beyond IBC Section 4(1) Threshold [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/16/500x300_2087856-nclt-mumbai-corporate-applicants-cirp-taxscan.webp "Corporate Applicant’s Own Petition under IBC S. 10 Admitted: NCLT Initiates CIRP on Finding Default Due and Payable Beyond IBC Section 4(1) Threshold [Read Order]")
Petition u/s 7 of IBC cannot be barred merely because of pending consideration of OTS before Lenders: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi bench has held that the mere fact that a corporate debtor's One Time Settlement (OTS) proposal is under consideration by other lenders...
![Petition u/s 7 of IBC cannot be barred merely because of pending consideration of OTS before Lenders: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/11/500x300_2085514-ibc-ots-nclat-taxscan.webp "Petition u/s 7 of IBC cannot be barred merely because of pending consideration of OTS before Lenders: NCLAT [Read Order]")