![ITAT Upholds CIT(A)s Deletion of Rs. 6.8 crore Addition for Bogus Purchase due to Submission of Valid Proof [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/itat-itat-delhi-cita-Bogus-Purchase-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT Upholds CIT(A)s Deletion of Rs. 6.8 crore Addition for Bogus Purchase due to Submission of Valid Proof [Read Order]")
ITAT Upholds CIT(A)'s Deletion of Rs. 6.8 crore Addition for Bogus Purchase due to Submission of Valid Proof [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[CIT(A)]'s decision to delete the Rs. 6.8 crore...
![Non-Consideration of Rectification Application for 4 years: Kerala HC directs ITO to decide Matter expeditiously [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Non-Consideration-of-Rectification-Application-Kerala-HC-directs-ITO-to-decide-Matter-expeditiously-TAXSCAN_300.jpg "Non-Consideration of Rectification Application for 4 years: Kerala HC directs ITO to decide Matter expeditiously [Read Order]")
![Bombay HC quashes Income Tax Notice seeking Reopening of Assessment on Incorrect Facts [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Bombay-High-Court-Income-Tax-Notice-Income-Tax-Notice-Reopening-of-Assessment-Assessment-Incorrect-Facts-Taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC quashes Income Tax Notice seeking Reopening of Assessment on Incorrect Facts [Read Order]")
![Interest Income from Deposits with Nationalized Bank is allowable for Deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of I-T Act : ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Interest-Income-from-Deposits-with-Nationalized-Bank-is-allowable-for-Deduction-I-T-Act-ITAT.jpg "Interest Income from Deposits with Nationalized Bank is allowable for Deduction u/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of I-T Act : ITAT [Read Order]")
Satisfaction u/s 151 of Income Tax Act is not Empty Formality: ITAT quashes Income Tax Addition made in Mechanical and Stereotyped Manner [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), observed that the satisfaction under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act is not an empty formality and quashed income tax addition made...
![Satisfaction u/s 151 of Income Tax Act is not Empty Formality: ITAT quashes Income Tax Addition made in Mechanical and Stereotyped Manner [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Satisfaction-us-151-of-Income-Tax-Act-is-not-Empty-Formality-ITAT-quashes-Income-Tax-Addition-made-in-Mechanical-and-Stereotyped-Manner-TAXSCAN.jpg "Satisfaction u/s 151 of Income Tax Act is not Empty Formality: ITAT quashes Income Tax Addition made in Mechanical and Stereotyped Manner [Read Order]")
Delhi HC sets aside Order passed u/s 148A(d) when AO voluntarily accepts the Mistakes in SCN issued [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench High Court has set aside the Order passed u/s 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 when Assessing Officer (AO) voluntarily accepts the mistakes in Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued. ...
![Delhi HC sets aside Order passed u/s 148A(d) when AO voluntarily accepts the Mistakes in SCN issued [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Delhi-HC-sets-aside-Order-passed-AO-voluntarily-accepts-the-Mistakes-in-SCN-issued-TAXSCAN.jpg "Delhi HC sets aside Order passed u/s 148A(d) when AO voluntarily accepts the Mistakes in SCN issued [Read Order]")
![ITAT quashes Assessment passed by the Officer in Lack of Jurisdiction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/ITAT-quashes-Assessment-passed-by-the-Officer-in-Lack-of-Jurisdiction-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT quashes Assessment passed by the Officer in Lack of Jurisdiction [Read Order]")
Granting Fake Refund Claim by Manipulating E-Records: Allahabad HC denies Bail to Officer of Income Tax Dept [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court has rejected a bail application by the then tax assistant for the alleged offense of granting fake refund claims by tampering with the electronic evidences and computer...
![Granting Fake Refund Claim by Manipulating E-Records: Allahabad HC denies Bail to Officer of Income Tax Dept [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Fake-Refund-Claim-E-Records-Allahabad-HC-Bail-Officer-Income-Tax-Department-taxscan.jpg "Granting Fake Refund Claim by Manipulating E-Records: Allahabad HC denies Bail to Officer of Income Tax Dept [Read Order]")
ITO having No Jurisdiction over Assessee cannot issue Notice u/s. 143(2): ITAT declares Assessment proceedings as void ab initio [Read Order]
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Kolkata bench consisting of Rajpal Yadav, Vice President and Manish Borad, Accountant Member held that Income Tax Officer (ITO)having no jurisdiction over...
![ITO having No Jurisdiction over Assessee cannot issue Notice u/s. 143(2): ITAT declares Assessment proceedings as void ab initio [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/ITO-jurisdiction-assessee-notice-ITAT-assessment-proceedings-void-ab-initio-Taxscan.jpg "ITO having No Jurisdiction over Assessee cannot issue Notice u/s. 143(2): ITAT declares Assessment proceedings as void ab initio [Read Order]")
Mere Technical Violation for which Assessee could not be Penalized by denying the Exemption: ITAT allows Exemption u/s 10(23B) [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that mere technical violation for which assessee could not be penalized by denying exemption and allow exemption u/s 10(23B). The...
![Mere Technical Violation for which Assessee could not be Penalized by denying the Exemption: ITAT allows Exemption u/s 10(23B) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Technical-Violation-Assessee-Penalized-ITAT-Exemption-Taxscan.jpeg "Mere Technical Violation for which Assessee could not be Penalized by denying the Exemption: ITAT allows Exemption u/s 10(23B) [Read Order]")
Payment for Acquisition of Leasehold Rights over an Immovable Property is not Rental Income, No TDS applicable: Madras High Court [Read Judgment]
The Madras High Court while following its earlier decision held that the payment for the acquisition of leasehold rights over immovable property is not rental income, hence not liable for deduction...
![Payment for Acquisition of Leasehold Rights over an Immovable Property is not Rental Income, No TDS applicable: Madras High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Payment-for-Acquisition-Leasehold-Rights-Immovable-Property-t-Rental-Income-TDS-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Payment for Acquisition of Leasehold Rights over an Immovable Property is not Rental Income, No TDS applicable: Madras High Court [Read Judgment]")