Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Justified For Indian Overseas Bank’s Mistaken DTAA Claim on Hong Kong Income: Madras HC [Read Order] Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Justified For Indian Overseas Bank’s Mistaken DTAA Claim on Hong Kong Income: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/03/13/2129179-madras-high-court-indian-overseas-bank-dtaa-hong-kong-dtaa-claim-case-indian-overseas-bank-case-taxscan.webp)
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Justified For Indian Overseas Bank’s Mistaken DTAA Claim on Hong Kong Income: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court has held that a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IncomeTax Act cannot be imposed on the Indian...


![GST Registration Found Not Credible, Fails to File Returns: Madras HC Refuses to Condone 418-Day Delay in Appeal [Read Order] GST Registration Found Not Credible, Fails to File Returns: Madras HC Refuses to Condone 418-Day Delay in Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/30/2122557-gst-registration-found-not-credible-fails-to-file-returns-madras-hc-refuses-to-condone-418-day-delay-in-appeal-taxscan.webp)
![No Higher Sales Tax on Kenwood Car Audio Systems Manufactured Using Imported Parts: Madras HC upholds 12.5% Levy [Read Order] No Higher Sales Tax on Kenwood Car Audio Systems Manufactured Using Imported Parts: Madras HC upholds 12.5% Levy [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/29/2122395-no-higher-sales-tax-on-kenwood-car-audio-systems-manufactured-using-imported-parts-madras-hc-upholds-125-levy-taxscan.webp)
![Import Declared as Grey Fabric Found to Be Corduroy: Madras HC Upholds Confiscation and Penalties under Customs Act, But Relieves Non‑Importing Entity [Read Order] Import Declared as Grey Fabric Found to Be Corduroy: Madras HC Upholds Confiscation and Penalties under Customs Act, But Relieves Non‑Importing Entity [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/14/2119460-import-declared-grey-fabric-found-t-corduroy-madras-hc-upholds-confiscation-penalties-under-customs-act-but-relieves-non-importing-entity-taxscan.webp)
![Limitation Plea Raised for First Time at Hearing Without Supporting Facts: Madras HC Upholds Tribunal’s Rejection [Read Order] Limitation Plea Raised for First Time at Hearing Without Supporting Facts: Madras HC Upholds Tribunal’s Rejection [Read Order]](/images/placeholder.jpg)
![ITR E-Filing Mandatory for Companies from May 2007: Madras HC Denies S. 80-IC Deduction to Gemini Communication Ltd [Read Order] ITR E-Filing Mandatory for Companies from May 2007: Madras HC Denies S. 80-IC Deduction to Gemini Communication Ltd [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/09/2117976-itr-e-filing-mandatory-companies-f-may-2007-madras-hc-deduction-gemini-communication-ltd-taxscan.webp)
![Madras HC Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Against Cognizant, Upholds 60% Depreciation on Computer Software for AY 2002-03 [Read Order] Madras HC Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Against Cognizant, Upholds 60% Depreciation on Computer Software for AY 2002-03 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/26/2114994-madras-hc-income-tax-reassessment-against-cognizant-depreciation-computer-software-ay-2002-03-taxscan.webp)
![Levy of IGST on Ocean Freight under CIF Contracts Invalid after Mohit Minerals Ruling: Madras HC [Read Order] Levy of IGST on Ocean Freight under CIF Contracts Invalid after Mohit Minerals Ruling: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/23/2099254-levyofigst-oceanfreight-cifcontractsinvalid-mohitmineralsruling-madrashc-taxscanoptimized150.webp)
![State Cannot Retrospectively Withdraw Purchase Tax Subsidy, Sugar Mills Entitled to Full Five Years: Madras HC [Read Order] State Cannot Retrospectively Withdraw Purchase Tax Subsidy, Sugar Mills Entitled to Full Five Years: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/18/2088433-sugar-mills-taxscan.webp)
![GST ITC Claims Made Before 30.11.2021 Valid u/s 16(5): Madras HC Quashes S. 73 Order, Clarifies Assessee Barred from Claiming Refund of Paid Tax Amount [Read Order] GST ITC Claims Made Before 30.11.2021 Valid u/s 16(5): Madras HC Quashes S. 73 Order, Clarifies Assessee Barred from Claiming Refund of Paid Tax Amount [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/21/2066735-gst-itc-gst-act-madrashc-taxscan.webp)
![Addition under Sales Act Based Solely on Sister Concern’s Higher Profit Unjustified Without Rule 18-C Enquiry: Madras HC [Read Order] Addition under Sales Act Based Solely on Sister Concern’s Higher Profit Unjustified Without Rule 18-C Enquiry: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/24/2053923-gst-order-gst-madras-high-court-addition-sales-act-based-solely-sister-higher-profit-taxscan.webp)