![NCLAT cannot condone Appeal Filing Delay beyond 45 Days: Supreme Court in Tata Steel Case [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/NCLAT-NCLAT-on-Appeal-Filing-Delay-limit-Supreme-Court-Tata-Steel-nclat-case-TAXSCAN.jpg "NCLAT cannot condone Appeal Filing Delay beyond 45 Days: Supreme Court in Tata Steel Case [Read Order]")
NCLAT cannot condone Appeal Filing Delay beyond 45 Days: Supreme Court in Tata Steel Case [Read Order]
On May 7, the Supreme Court ruled that the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), acting as the Adjudicating Authority under the Insolvency...
![Allahabad HC Excludes Time Spent in Bona Fide Litigation Before HC, SC u/s 14 of Limitation, Allows GST Appeal Before AA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/allahabad-hc-Bona-Fide-Litigation-GST-TAXSCAN.jpg "Allahabad HC Excludes Time Spent in Bona Fide Litigation Before HC, SC u/s 14 of Limitation, Allows GST Appeal Before AA [Read Order]")
![Application u/s 9 of IBC Based on Arbitral Award Cannot be Admittted After 3 Yrs from Date of Award: NCLT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Arbitral-Award-IBC-NCLT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Application u/s 9 of IBC Based on Arbitral Award Cannot be Admittted After 3 Yrs from Date of Award: NCLT [Read Order]")
![Appeal Delayed Beyond 15 Days Not Condonable as Per Proviso of Section 61(2) of IBC: NCLAT refuses to Condone 19 Days Delay by Kotak Mahindra [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Appeal-Delayed-Condonable-as-Per-Proviso-Per-Proviso-Section-612-of-IBC-IBC-NCLAT-NCLAT-refuses-NCLAT-refuses-to-Condone-Kotak-Mahindra-taxscan.jpg "Appeal Delayed Beyond 15 Days Not Condonable as Per Proviso of Section 61(2) of IBC: NCLAT refuses to Condone 19 Days Delay by Kotak Mahindra [Read Order]")
Benefit u/s 19 of Limitation Act Applicable on Last Payment Made by Corporate Debtor Within Period of Limitation: NCLAT [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT)has held that the operational creditor was obviously entitled to the benefit of an extension of limitation...
AO passes Ex Parte Assessment Order without considering ITR Filed in response to S. 148: ITAT directs to pass Order afresh [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) found that the Assessing Officer ( AO ) had passed an ex parte assessment order without considering the return filed by the assessee in...
![AO passes Ex Parte Assessment Order without considering ITR Filed in response to S. 148: ITAT directs to pass Order afresh [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Ex-Parte-Assessment-Order-ITR-Filed-Section-148-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "AO passes Ex Parte Assessment Order without considering ITR Filed in response to S. 148: ITAT directs to pass Order afresh [Read Order]")
Appeal against Refund Rejection order filed within Statutory Period under Limitation Act: Delhi HC directs to consider Appeal on Merits [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has held that the appeal against the refund rejection order shall be considered on merits on the finding that the same is filed within the statutory period of 3 months based on...
![Appeal against Refund Rejection order filed within Statutory Period under Limitation Act: Delhi HC directs to consider Appeal on Merits [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Appeal-Refund-Rejection-Order-Statutory-Period-Limitation-Act-Delhi-HC-Appeal-on-Merits-taxscan.jpg "Appeal against Refund Rejection order filed within Statutory Period under Limitation Act: Delhi HC directs to consider Appeal on Merits [Read Order]")
No Cogent and Satisfactory Explanation u/s 5 of Limitation Act: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay of 781 Days [Read Order]
The Amritsar Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has refused to condone a delay of 781 days holding that cogent and satisfactory explanation were not furnished by the assessee as per...
![No Cogent and Satisfactory Explanation u/s 5 of Limitation Act: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay of 781 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Cogent-and-Satisfactory-Explanation-Limitation-Act-ITAT-ITAT-Refuses-to-Condone-Delay-of-781-Days-Condone-Delay-taxscan.jpg "No Cogent and Satisfactory Explanation u/s 5 of Limitation Act: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay of 781 Days [Read Order]")
Illness of Counsel Not Supported by Medical Certificate: Orissa HC Refuses to Condone Delay in Filing Sales Tax Appeal [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court ( HC ) in its recent judgement refused to condone the delay in filing a sales tax appeal Since the illness of the counsel was not supported by a Medical Certificate. ...
![Illness of Counsel Not Supported by Medical Certificate: Orissa HC Refuses to Condone Delay in Filing Sales Tax Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Illness-of-Counsel-Medical-Certificate-Orissa-High-Court-Condone-Delay-Filing-Sales-Tax-Appeal-Sales-Tax-Appeal-Appeal-sales-tax-Taxscan.jpg "Illness of Counsel Not Supported by Medical Certificate: Orissa HC Refuses to Condone Delay in Filing Sales Tax Appeal [Read Order]")
Period of Tax Appeal filed before an Authority without Jurisdiction shall be excluded from Limitation Period: Delhi HC upholds Validity of Revision Petition [Read Order]
A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court, while upholding the validity of a revision petition, held that the time spent in prosecuting a tax appeal before an authority devoid of jurisdiction shall...
![Period of Tax Appeal filed before an Authority without Jurisdiction shall be excluded from Limitation Period: Delhi HC upholds Validity of Revision Petition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Period-of-Tax-Limitation-Period-Delhi-HC-Revision-Petition.jpg "Period of Tax Appeal filed before an Authority without Jurisdiction shall be excluded from Limitation Period: Delhi HC upholds Validity of Revision Petition [Read Order]")
Limitation Act applicable on Arbitration Proceedings initiated under MSMED Act: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court held that the Limitation Act applicable on Arbitration Proceedings initiated under Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (MSMED). The respondent, Kerala...
