Madras High Court
Madras High Court,Madras HC ,High court of Madras,Chennai High Court,Tamil Nadu High Court
![Addition under Sales Act Based Solely on Sister Concern’s Higher Profit Unjustified Without Rule 18-C Enquiry: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/24/500x300_2053923-gst-order-gst-madras-high-court-addition-sales-act-based-solely-sister-higher-profit-taxscan.webp "Addition under Sales Act Based Solely on Sister Concern’s Higher Profit Unjustified Without Rule 18-C Enquiry: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Addition under Sales Act Based Solely on Sister Concern’s Higher Profit Unjustified Without Rule 18-C Enquiry: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has ruled that an addition under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax ( NGST ) Act based solely on the higher gross profit of a...
![No Notice Issued to Legal Heir of Deceased Assessee, Rectification filed Rejected: Madras HC sets aside Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/24/250x150_2053948-madras-hc-gst-notice-taxscan.webp "No Notice Issued to Legal Heir of Deceased Assessee, Rectification filed Rejected: Madras HC sets aside Order [Read Order]")
![Dual GST Demands for Same Assessment Year Cannot be Sustained in Law: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/24/250x150_2053936-dual-gst-assessment-order-taxscan.webp "Dual GST Demands for Same Assessment Year Cannot be Sustained in Law: Madras HC [Read Order]")
![Madras HC dismisses Writ Petition as GST payer admitted to Tax liability in a Reply [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/24/250x150_2053921-tax-liability-gst-payer-writ-petition-taxscan.webp "Madras HC dismisses Writ Petition as GST payer admitted to Tax liability in a Reply [Read Order]")
![Union Properties Exempted from State Taxes Irrespective of its Use: Madras HC overturns Single bench’s Decision [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/24/250x150_2053888-madras-hc-union-properties-exempted-single-benchs-taxscan.webp "Union Properties Exempted from State Taxes Irrespective of its Use: Madras HC overturns Single bench’s Decision [Read Order]")
15 Lines Extracted from 10-Page GST Reply: Madras HC Criticises Dept for Not Considering Reply Properly or Seeking Additional Documents [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court criticised the GST ( Goods and Services tax ) department for not considering reply properly or seeking additional documents. The court observed that out of...
![15 Lines Extracted from 10-Page GST Reply: Madras HC Criticises Dept for Not Considering Reply Properly or Seeking Additional Documents [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/23/500x300_2053101-madras-high-court-gst-reply-additional-documents-taxscan.webp "15 Lines Extracted from 10-Page GST Reply: Madras HC Criticises Dept for Not Considering Reply Properly or Seeking Additional Documents [Read Order]")
RLDA Not a Juristic Entity, Madras HC sets aside Property Tax by Municipality on Railway Land Being Unconstitutional [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has held that the Railway Land Development Authority (RLDA) is not a juristic entity and set aside the property tax imposed by the municipality on railway land being ...
![RLDA Not a Juristic Entity, Madras HC sets aside Property Tax by Municipality on Railway Land Being Unconstitutional [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/20/500x300_2051133-rlda-madras-hc-property-taxrailway-land-being-unconstitutional-taxscan.webp "RLDA Not a Juristic Entity, Madras HC sets aside Property Tax by Municipality on Railway Land Being Unconstitutional [Read Order]")
At Least One GST Reminder Must Be Sent via RPAD Before Passing Ex-Parte Order : Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has held that before passing an ex-parte order, the tax authority must send at least one reminder notice through Registered Post Acknowledgement Due (RPAD) or any other valid...
![At Least One GST Reminder Must Be Sent via RPAD Before Passing Ex-Parte Order : Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050643-gst-reminder-gst-reminder-must-be-sent-via-rpad-via-rpad-taxscan.webp "At Least One GST Reminder Must Be Sent via RPAD Before Passing Ex-Parte Order : Madras HC [Read Order]")
![Reopening of Assessment Without Complying with S. 143(2) Procedure Is Bad in Law: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050631-procedure-procedure-is-bad-in-law-madras-high-court-taxscan.webp "Reopening of Assessment Without Complying with S. 143(2) Procedure Is Bad in Law: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Income Tax Deduction u/s 80HHC Had to Be Given Without Reducing S. 80IB Deduction: Madras HC Follows SC Ruling [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has reaffirmed that deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 must be granted without reducing the amount allowed under Section 80IB. The first question...
![Income Tax Deduction u/s 80HHC Had to Be Given Without Reducing S. 80IB Deduction: Madras HC Follows SC Ruling [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050629-income-tax-deduction-income-tax-deduction-madras-hc-taxscan.webp "Income Tax Deduction u/s 80HHC Had to Be Given Without Reducing S. 80IB Deduction: Madras HC Follows SC Ruling [Read Order]")
GST Appeal filing Delayed by 58 Days due to Pendency in Rectification Application: Madras HC Grants Relief [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has condoned a 58-day delay in filing a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) appeal, caused by the pendency of a rectification application, and directed the authorities to hear ...
![GST Appeal filing Delayed by 58 Days due to Pendency in Rectification Application: Madras HC Grants Relief [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050617-gst-appeal-filing-gst-appeal-pendency-in-rectification-application-taxscan.webp "GST Appeal filing Delayed by 58 Days due to Pendency in Rectification Application: Madras HC Grants Relief [Read Order]")
GST Demand of Rs. 16.67Cr Mechanically Confirmed on Mismatch in ITC Claim: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has set aside a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) demand of ₹16.67 crore raised against a tollway company, holding that the proceedings were mechanical and failed to consider the...
![GST Demand of Rs. 16.67Cr Mechanically Confirmed on Mismatch in ITC Claim: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050620-madras-hc-gst-demand-mismatch-itc-taxscan.webp "GST Demand of Rs. 16.67Cr Mechanically Confirmed on Mismatch in ITC Claim: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order]")