Revenue Counsel admits Genuinity of Unexplained Investment Later: Madras HC refuses Remand Request as Transaction Proven Genuine
The Madras High Court, in its recent ruling, refused to remand the matter as the transaction of the unexplained investment proved genuine. The income...
![GST Dept admits Violation of Personal Hearing mandated u/s 75(4): Madras HC Quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/GST-Goods-and-Service-Tax-GST-Act-GST-Act-2017-GST-assessment-order-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST Dept admits Violation of Personal Hearing mandated u/s 75(4): Madras HC Quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]")
![No Jurisdiction to AO for considering Claim by Assessee in Revised Return filed after Time Prescribed u/s 139(5) of Income Tax Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Return-Assessing-Officer-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Jurisdiction to AO for considering Claim by Assessee in Revised Return filed after Time Prescribed u/s 139(5) of Income Tax Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]")
![Musicians Status as Service u/s 65 B(44) of Finance Act: Madras HC rejects Harris Jayarajs Plea to quash Service Tax Notice, remands Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-Service-Tax-Notice-Harris-Jayaraj-Taxscan.jpg "Musicians Status as Service u/s 65 B(44) of Finance Act: Madras HC rejects Harris Jayarajs Plea to quash Service Tax Notice, remands Matter [Read Order]")
![GST ITC Rejected due to Claims filed beyond Period Specified u/s 16(4): Madras HC Directs to Re-do Assessment in Light of Finance Act, 2024 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-GST-GST-ITC-Rejected-Input-Tax-Credit-Finance-Act-GST-department-taxscan.jpg "GST ITC Rejected due to Claims filed beyond Period Specified u/s 16(4): Madras HC Directs to Re-do Assessment in Light of Finance Act, 2024 [Read Order]")
[Breaking] Zero Rated Export Goods seized due to Missing GST E-invoice: Madras HC directs Provisional Release Subject to Proof in GSTR [Read Order]
The Madras High Court allowed the provisional release of zero-rated export goods seized by authorities due to the non-generation of an E-invoice. The vehicle carrying the export goods of zero rated...
![[Breaking] Zero Rated Export Goods seized due to Missing GST E-invoice: Madras HC directs Provisional Release Subject to Proof in GSTR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Zero-Rated-Export-Goods-seized-Missing-GST-E-invoice-Madras-HC-directs-Provisional-Release-Subject-Proof-in-GSTR-taxscan.jpg "[Breaking] Zero Rated Export Goods seized due to Missing GST E-invoice: Madras HC directs Provisional Release Subject to Proof in GSTR [Read Order]")
Madras HC Remands GST Demand Alleged Suppression of Taxable Turnover Matter Citing Failure to Consider Taxpayer's Submissions [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court remanded the matter concerning the Goods and Service Tax (GST) demand order alleged suppression of table turnover citing Tax Authorities’ failure to consider...
![Madras HC Remands GST Demand Alleged Suppression of Taxable Turnover Matter Citing Failure to Consider Taxpayers Submissions [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-Madras-HC-GST-Goods-and-Service-Tax-GST-Demand-Taxpayer-Madras-HC-Remands-GST-Demand-TAXSCAN.jpg "Madras HC Remands GST Demand Alleged Suppression of Taxable Turnover Matter Citing Failure to Consider Taxpayers Submissions [Read Order]")
Madras HC confirms 150% Penalty imposed u/s 16(2)(d) of TNGST Act for Sales/Purchase Suppression Despite Deleting Speculative Additions [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court confirmed a 150% penalty imposed under Section 16(2)(d) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (TNGST Act) for sales/purchases suppression despite...
![Madras HC confirms 150% Penalty imposed u/s 16(2)(d) of TNGST Act for Sales/Purchase Suppression Despite Deleting Speculative Additions [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-HC-Madras-High-Court-Madras-HC-Confirms-TNGST-Act-sales-or-purchases-suppression-Deleting-Speculative-Additions-High-Court-news-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC confirms 150% Penalty imposed u/s 16(2)(d) of TNGST Act for Sales/Purchase Suppression Despite Deleting Speculative Additions [Read Order]")
'Powder Coating' for Yokes, Links, and Tubes Constitutes Works Contract, Liable to VAT: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has ruled that the work involving 'powder coating' of yokes, links, and tubes constitutes a works contract and is therefore liable for Value Added Tax ( VAT ). The Commercial...
![Powder Coating for Yokes, Links, and Tubes Constitutes Works Contract, Liable to VAT: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-Value-Added-Tax-Powder-coating-tubes-TAXSCAN.jpg "Powder Coating for Yokes, Links, and Tubes Constitutes Works Contract, Liable to VAT: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Two GST SCN for same AY issued by different Officers, Leading to Non-reply to one SCN: Madras HC directs to Issue Fresh Order [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court directed to issue fresh orders on matters where two Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) notices were issued by the different GST officers for the same Assessment...
![Two GST SCN for same AY issued by different Officers, Leading to Non-reply to one SCN: Madras HC directs to Issue Fresh Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-GST-SCN-AY-Taxscan.jpg "Two GST SCN for same AY issued by different Officers, Leading to Non-reply to one SCN: Madras HC directs to Issue Fresh Order [Read Order]")
41% disputed GST recovered without Providing Hearing opportunity: Madras HC sets aside Demand Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has set aside a demand order after discovering that 41% of the disputed GST ( Goods and Services Tax) amount was recovered and issued a demand order without granting the...
![41% disputed GST recovered without Providing Hearing opportunity: Madras HC sets aside Demand Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-Madras-HC-GST-Goods-and-Services-Tax-Hearing-opportunity-Demand-Order-GST-Demand-Order-TAXSCAN.webp "41% disputed GST recovered without Providing Hearing opportunity: Madras HC sets aside Demand Order [Read Order]")