Madras High Court
Madras High Court,Madras HC ,High court of Madras,Chennai High Court,Tamil Nadu High Court
![No Physical Notice Served: Madras HC Condones 285-Day Delay in Filing GST Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Madras-High-Court-GST-Appeal-Physical-Notice-Taxscan.jpg "No Physical Notice Served: Madras HC Condones 285-Day Delay in Filing GST Appeal [Read Order]")
No Physical Notice Served: Madras HC Condones 285-Day Delay in Filing GST Appeal [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court condoned a 285-day delay in filing the Goods and Service Tax (GST) Appeal considering that no physical...
![GST dept rejects 60 Pages Detailed Objections on Demand Order in ‘One Line’: Madras HC sets aside Non-Speaking Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/GST-dept-Demand-Order-Madras-HC-taxscan.jpeg "GST dept rejects 60 Pages Detailed Objections on Demand Order in ‘One Line’: Madras HC sets aside Non-Speaking Order [Read Order]")
![Demand Notice on GSTR Mismatch issued after 5 Years GST Registration Cancelled: Madras HC sets aside Order on 5% Pre-deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-GST-GST-mismatch-demand-notice-GST-registration-cancellation-GSTR-mismatch-GST-demand-order-taxscan.jpeg "Demand Notice on GSTR Mismatch issued after 5 Years GST Registration Cancelled: Madras HC sets aside Order on 5% Pre-deposit [Read Order]")
![GST Demand raised on Difference of Tamil Nadu and All India Turnover: Madras HC sets aside Order on 10% Pre-Deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-GST-Pre-Deposit-Taxscan.jpg "GST Demand raised on Difference of Tamil Nadu and All India Turnover: Madras HC sets aside Order on 10% Pre-Deposit [Read Order]")
![Misses GST Hearings Despite SMS and Email Notices: Madras HC orders Reconsideration on 25% Pre-Deposit from ECR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/GST-Madras-HC-GST-Hearing-Madras-High-Court-ECR-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Misses GST Hearings Despite SMS and Email Notices: Madras HC orders Reconsideration on 25% Pre-Deposit from ECR [Read Order]")
GST Department Not at Fault for Not Providing Physical Copy of SCN Once Uploaded in Portal: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court recently ruled that the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) department is not at fault for failing to provide a physical copy of a Show Cause Notice ( SCN ) once it has been uploaded...
![GST Department Not at Fault for Not Providing Physical Copy of SCN Once Uploaded in Portal: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/GST-Madras-High-Court-GST-Department-SCN-Show-Cause-Notice-GST-Portal-Taxscan.jpg "GST Department Not at Fault for Not Providing Physical Copy of SCN Once Uploaded in Portal: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Orders issued against deceased and insolvent individual: Madras HC quashes Income Tax Assessment, directs authorities to proceed through official assignee [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court quashed the income tax assessment due to order issuance against deceased and insolvent individuals. The court directed the tax authorities to proceed through...
![Orders issued against deceased and insolvent individual: Madras HC quashes Income Tax Assessment, directs authorities to proceed through official assignee [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-income-tax-assessment-Tax-assessment-on-deceased-individual-Insolvent-individual-income-tax-case-taxscan.jpg "Orders issued against deceased and insolvent individual: Madras HC quashes Income Tax Assessment, directs authorities to proceed through official assignee [Read Order]")
216 Days undue Delay in Filing ITR by Co-Op Society: Madras HC dismisses Petition Claiming 80P Deduction under Income Tax [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition filed for claiming deductions under Section 80 P of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and did not condone the delay in filing Income Tax...
![216 Days undue Delay in Filing ITR by Co-Op Society: Madras HC dismisses Petition Claiming 80P Deduction under Income Tax [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-Income-Tax-ITR-Income-Tax-Deduction-Taxscan.jpg "216 Days undue Delay in Filing ITR by Co-Op Society: Madras HC dismisses Petition Claiming 80P Deduction under Income Tax [Read Order]")
Personal Hearing Lapse in S. 74 GST Demand on B2C Sales Entry Error in GSTR 1: Madras HC quashes Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court quashed a Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand order issued under Section 74, triggered by a mistaken entry of B2C sales in GSTR 1. It quashed the GST Assessment order on...
![Personal Hearing Lapse in S. 74 GST Demand on B2C Sales Entry Error in GSTR 1: Madras HC quashes Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-GST-GST-Demand-GSTR-1-B2C-Sales-Entry-Error-in-GSTR-1-GST-Demand-on-GSTR-1-Error-Taxscan.jpg "Personal Hearing Lapse in S. 74 GST Demand on B2C Sales Entry Error in GSTR 1: Madras HC quashes Order [Read Order]")
Cross Examination by Excise Dept required only for Confirmation of Demand based Solely on Witness Statements: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court clarified that cross-examination in quasi-judicial proceedings is necessary only when witness statements serve as the exclusive basis for confirming excise...
Mere Mentioning of Wrong VAT Provision does not invalidate Order if Authority has Proper Jurisdiction: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court ruled that mere mentioning of a wrong value-added tax ( VAT ) Provision or non-mentioning of a provision does not invalidate an order if the court or...
![Mere Mentioning of Wrong VAT Provision does not invalidate Order if Authority has Proper Jurisdiction: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/VAT-Madras-High-Court-Madras-HC-value-added-tax-VAT-order-TAXSCAN.jpg "Mere Mentioning of Wrong VAT Provision does not invalidate Order if Authority has Proper Jurisdiction: Madras HC [Read Order]")