Madras High Court
Madras High Court,Madras HC ,High court of Madras,Chennai High Court,Tamil Nadu High Court
![GST Recovery and Hearing Notices ignored: Madras HC orders 25% Pre-Deposit from Cash Ledger for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/GST-Goods-and-Services-Tax-pre-deposit-Madras-HC-Electronic-Cash-Ledger-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST Recovery and Hearing Notices ignored: Madras HC orders 25% Pre-Deposit from Cash Ledger for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]")
GST Recovery and Hearing Notices ignored: Madras HC orders 25% Pre-Deposit from Cash Ledger for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]
In a matter of ignorance of the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) recovery notices and the hearing notices, the Madras High Court has ordered the...
![GST DRC-01 issued for Wrong Assessment Year: Madras HC quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/GST-DRC-01-Wrong-Assessment-Year-Madras-HC-Assessment-Order-taxscan.png "GST DRC-01 issued for Wrong Assessment Year: Madras HC quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]")
![GST Dept admits Violation of Personal Hearing mandated u/s 75(4): Madras HC Quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/GST-Goods-and-Service-Tax-GST-Act-GST-Act-2017-GST-assessment-order-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST Dept admits Violation of Personal Hearing mandated u/s 75(4): Madras HC Quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]")
No Jurisdiction to AO for considering Claim by Assessee in Revised Return filed after Time Prescribed u/s 139(5) of Income Tax Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]
In a significant case, the Supreme Court while upholding the order of the Madras High Court held that the Assessing Officer ( AO ) had no jurisdiction to consider the claim by Assessee in revised...
![No Jurisdiction to AO for considering Claim by Assessee in Revised Return filed after Time Prescribed u/s 139(5) of Income Tax Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Return-Assessing-Officer-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Jurisdiction to AO for considering Claim by Assessee in Revised Return filed after Time Prescribed u/s 139(5) of Income Tax Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]")
Musician's Status as 'Service' u/s 65 B(44) of Finance Act: Madras HC rejects Harris Jayaraj's Plea to quash Service Tax Notice, remands Matter [Read Order]
In a recent judgment, the Madras High Court rejected Harris Jayaraj’s plea that Musician’s status does not fall under the definition of "service" as defined under Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act,...
![Musicians Status as Service u/s 65 B(44) of Finance Act: Madras HC rejects Harris Jayarajs Plea to quash Service Tax Notice, remands Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-Service-Tax-Notice-Harris-Jayaraj-Taxscan.jpg "Musicians Status as Service u/s 65 B(44) of Finance Act: Madras HC rejects Harris Jayarajs Plea to quash Service Tax Notice, remands Matter [Read Order]")
GST ITC Rejected due to Claims filed beyond Period Specified u/s 16(4): Madras HC Directs to Re-do Assessment in Light of Finance Act, 2024 [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has directed the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) department to re-do the assessment considering the amendments in Finance Act ( No. 2 ), 2024 in a matter of rejection of Input...
![GST ITC Rejected due to Claims filed beyond Period Specified u/s 16(4): Madras HC Directs to Re-do Assessment in Light of Finance Act, 2024 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-GST-GST-ITC-Rejected-Input-Tax-Credit-Finance-Act-GST-department-taxscan.jpg "GST ITC Rejected due to Claims filed beyond Period Specified u/s 16(4): Madras HC Directs to Re-do Assessment in Light of Finance Act, 2024 [Read Order]")
[Breaking] Zero Rated Export Goods seized due to Missing GST E-invoice: Madras HC directs Provisional Release Subject to Proof in GSTR [Read Order]
The Madras High Court allowed the provisional release of zero-rated export goods seized by authorities due to the non-generation of an E-invoice. The vehicle carrying the export goods of zero rated...
![[Breaking] Zero Rated Export Goods seized due to Missing GST E-invoice: Madras HC directs Provisional Release Subject to Proof in GSTR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Zero-Rated-Export-Goods-seized-Missing-GST-E-invoice-Madras-HC-directs-Provisional-Release-Subject-Proof-in-GSTR-taxscan.jpg "[Breaking] Zero Rated Export Goods seized due to Missing GST E-invoice: Madras HC directs Provisional Release Subject to Proof in GSTR [Read Order]")
Madras HC Remands GST Demand Alleged Suppression of Taxable Turnover Matter Citing Failure to Consider Taxpayer's Submissions [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court remanded the matter concerning the Goods and Service Tax (GST) demand order alleged suppression of table turnover citing Tax Authorities’ failure to consider...
![Madras HC Remands GST Demand Alleged Suppression of Taxable Turnover Matter Citing Failure to Consider Taxpayers Submissions [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-Madras-HC-GST-Goods-and-Service-Tax-GST-Demand-Taxpayer-Madras-HC-Remands-GST-Demand-TAXSCAN.jpg "Madras HC Remands GST Demand Alleged Suppression of Taxable Turnover Matter Citing Failure to Consider Taxpayers Submissions [Read Order]")
Madras HC confirms 150% Penalty imposed u/s 16(2)(d) of TNGST Act for Sales/Purchase Suppression Despite Deleting Speculative Additions [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court confirmed a 150% penalty imposed under Section 16(2)(d) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 (TNGST Act) for sales/purchases suppression despite...
![Madras HC confirms 150% Penalty imposed u/s 16(2)(d) of TNGST Act for Sales/Purchase Suppression Despite Deleting Speculative Additions [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-HC-Madras-High-Court-Madras-HC-Confirms-TNGST-Act-sales-or-purchases-suppression-Deleting-Speculative-Additions-High-Court-news-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC confirms 150% Penalty imposed u/s 16(2)(d) of TNGST Act for Sales/Purchase Suppression Despite Deleting Speculative Additions [Read Order]")
