Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Ex-Parte Order after 10 Notices Not Final: ITAT Remands ₹64.12 Lakh S. 69C Disallowance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/09/500x300_2117948-ex-parte-order-after-10-notices-not-final-itat-remands.webp "Ex-Parte Order after 10 Notices Not Final: ITAT Remands ₹64.12 Lakh S. 69C Disallowance [Read Order]")
Ex-Parte Order after 10 Notices Not Final: ITAT Remands ₹64.12 Lakh S. 69C Disallowance [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench (ITAT), has held that an ex-parte appellate order passed without adjudicating issues on merits cannot...
![Purchases cannot be Disallowed Merely on Employee Statements without Evidence: ITAT Deletes 12.5% Ad-Hoc Disallowance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/08/250x150_2117677-purchases-disallowance-itat-taxscan.webp "Purchases cannot be Disallowed Merely on Employee Statements without Evidence: ITAT Deletes 12.5% Ad-Hoc Disallowance [Read Order]")
![Client Code Modification in F&O Transactions Allegations Need Transaction-Level Proof: ITAT Remands ₹1.33 Cr Income Addition Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/06/250x150_2117276-client-code-modification-ccm-taxscan.webp "Client Code Modification in F&O Transactions Allegations Need Transaction-Level Proof: ITAT Remands ₹1.33 Cr Income Addition Matter [Read Order]")
![Excise Duty Hike Notification Not Published In Gazette When Goods Cleared: CESTAT Rejects Revenue’s Demand on BPCL [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/05/250x150_2117136-site-image-4-t-1.webp "Excise Duty Hike Notification Not Published In Gazette When Goods Cleared: CESTAT Rejects Revenue’s Demand on BPCL [Read Order]")
![Full Settlement: NCLT Approves Resolution Plan with 100% Voting Share from Creditors [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/02/250x150_2116658-full-settlement-nclt-approves-resolution-plan-with-100-voting-share-from-creditors.webp "Full Settlement: NCLT Approves Resolution Plan with 100% Voting Share from Creditors [Read Order]")
![Full Settlement: NCLT Approves Resolution Plan with 100% Voting Share from Creditors [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/01/500x300_2116451-full-settlement-nclt-approves-resolution-plan.webp "Full Settlement: NCLT Approves Resolution Plan with 100% Voting Share from Creditors [Read Order]")
Mechanical 145A Addition Set Aside: ITAT Rules Profit-Neutral MODVAT Adjustment Can’t Trigger Tax [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that a mechanical adjustment under Section 145A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, without demonstrating any real impact on profits,...
![Mechanical 145A Addition Set Aside: ITAT Rules Profit-Neutral MODVAT Adjustment Can’t Trigger Tax [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/27/500x300_2115310-mechanical-145a-addition-set-aside-itat-rules-profit-neutral-modvat-adjustment-cant-trigger-tax-taxscan.webp "Mechanical 145A Addition Set Aside: ITAT Rules Profit-Neutral MODVAT Adjustment Can’t Trigger Tax [Read Order]")
![No S.68 Addition on Sale of Inherited Jewellery Backed by Valuation Report: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/27/500x300_2115289-no-s68-addition-sale-inherited-jewellery-backed-valuation-report-itat-taxscan.webp "No S.68 Addition on Sale of Inherited Jewellery Backed by Valuation Report: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Annual Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part XI]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/25/500x300_2114724-annual-income-tax-case-digest-itat-decisions-2025-part-xi-taxscan.jfif "Annual Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part XI]")
Penalty on CHA Not Sustainable When Classification Dispute is Settled in Favour of Importer and No Misdeclaration is Established: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) is not sustainable when the classification dispute is settled...
![Penalty on CHA Not Sustainable When Classification Dispute is Settled in Favour of Importer and No Misdeclaration is Established: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/500x300_2113773-penalty-cha-not-sustainable-taxscan.jfif "Penalty on CHA Not Sustainable When Classification Dispute is Settled in Favour of Importer and No Misdeclaration is Established: CESTAT [Read Order]")