![No S.68 Addition on Sale of Inherited Jewellery Backed by Valuation Report: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/27/500x300_2115289-no-s68-addition-sale-inherited-jewellery-backed-valuation-report-itat-taxscan.webp "No S.68 Addition on Sale of Inherited Jewellery Backed by Valuation Report: ITAT [Read Order]")
No S.68 Addition on Sale of Inherited Jewellery Backed by Valuation Report: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench (ITAT) has held that in the case where the sale of inherited jewellery is supported by a valuation...
![Annual Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part XI]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/25/250x150_2114724-annual-income-tax-case-digest-itat-decisions-2025-part-xi-taxscan.jfif "Annual Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part XI]")
![Penalty on CHA Not Sustainable When Classification Dispute is Settled in Favour of Importer and No Misdeclaration is Established: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/250x150_2113773-penalty-cha-not-sustainable-taxscan.jfif "Penalty on CHA Not Sustainable When Classification Dispute is Settled in Favour of Importer and No Misdeclaration is Established: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CIT(A) Failed to Consider Filed Evidence: ITAT Restores Income Tax Appeal With Cost to PM Relief Fund [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/250x150_2113722-cita-failed-consider-filed-evidence-itat-restores-income-tax-appeal-cost-pm-relief-fund-taxscan.webp "CIT(A) Failed to Consider Filed Evidence: ITAT Restores Income Tax Appeal With Cost to PM Relief Fund [Read Order]")
![No 115JB Adjustment for Section 14A: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)s ₹71 Lakh Cap [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/22/250x150_2113730-no-115jb-adjustment-section-14a-taxscan.jfif "No 115JB Adjustment for Section 14A: ITAT Upholds CIT(A)s ₹71 Lakh Cap [Read Order]")
No Deemed Dividend on Business Advances between Holding and Subsidiary Companies u/s 2(22)(e): ITAT [Read Order]
Section 2(22)(e) applies only to gratuitous loans or advances to shareholders, not to reciprocal and business-related transactions The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench,...
![No Deemed Dividend on Business Advances between Holding and Subsidiary Companies u/s 2(22)(e): ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/09/500x300_2111154-no-deemed-dividend-business-advances-holding-subsidiary-companies-itat-taxscan-jpg.webp "No Deemed Dividend on Business Advances between Holding and Subsidiary Companies u/s 2(22)(e): ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT holds Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Unjustified in Absence of Malafide Intent, rejects Precedent [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was not sustainable as the omission of...
![ITAT holds Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Unjustified in Absence of Malafide Intent, rejects Precedent [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-penalty-rejects-Precedent-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT holds Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Unjustified in Absence of Malafide Intent, rejects Precedent [Read Order]")
Assessee Entitled to S. 80IA(4)(iii) Deduction as No Violation of Scheme Conditions Found: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the assessee was entitled to a deduction under Section 80IA(4)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as no violation of scheme...
![Assessee Entitled to S. 80IA(4)(iii) Deduction as No Violation of Scheme Conditions Found: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Income-Tax-Deduction-1.jpg "Assessee Entitled to S. 80IA(4)(iii) Deduction as No Violation of Scheme Conditions Found: ITAT [Read Order]")
![CESTAT upholds Service Tax Refund Claim Rejection on Course by YCMOU [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-upholds-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Refund-Refund-Claim-Rejection-Rejection-Rejection-on-Course-by-YCMOU-YCMOU-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT upholds Service Tax Refund Claim Rejection on Course by YCMOU [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Annual Digest 2024: Indirect Tax Cases [Part 13]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Annual-Digest-2024-Indirect-Tax-Cases-Part-13-Annual-Digest-2024-Indirect-Tax-Cases-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT Annual Digest 2024: Indirect Tax Cases [Part 13]")
Discount claim under Excise Duty stating Written off of Value in Books of Account: CESTAT sets aside Demand of Excise Duty on Value of Goods Mentioned in Price List [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT) sets aside the demand of Excise Duty based on value of goods mentioned in price list even after the appellant...
![Discount claim under Excise Duty stating Written off of Value in Books of Account: CESTAT sets aside Demand of Excise Duty on Value of Goods Mentioned in Price List [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Discount-claim-Discount-claim-under-Excise-Duty-Excise-Duty-Value-in-Books-of-Account-CESTAT-CESTAT-sets-taxscan.jpg "Discount claim under Excise Duty stating Written off of Value in Books of Account: CESTAT sets aside Demand of Excise Duty on Value of Goods Mentioned in Price List [Read Order]")
CESTATÂ sets aside Customs Broker Licence Revocation and Penalty concerning Export Overvaluation Dispute [Read Order]
In a recent decision, the Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside the customs broker license revocation of M/s Rupali Logistics Clearing & Forwarding...
![CESTATÂ sets aside Customs Broker Licence Revocation and Penalty concerning Export Overvaluation Dispute [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-sets-Customs-Broker-Licence-Revocation-Penalty-concerning-Overvaluation-Dispute-Penalty-concerning-Export-taxscan.jpg "CESTATÂ sets aside Customs Broker Licence Revocation and Penalty concerning Export Overvaluation Dispute [Read Order]")