![Issuance of SCN without Allegation of wilful suppression or fraud: CESTAT quashes Demand of Service Tax on ground of Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Issuance-SCN-Allegation-wilful-fraud-CESTAT-Demand-Service-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "Issuance of SCN without Allegation of wilful suppression or fraud: CESTAT quashes Demand of Service Tax on ground of Limitation [Read Order]")
Issuance of SCN without Allegation of wilful suppression or fraud: CESTAT quashes Demand of Service Tax on ground of Limitation [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the demand for service tax on the ground of...
![Service Tax not Leviable on Services in Nature of Software Development: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Service-Tax-Leviable-Services-Nature-Software-Development-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Service Tax not Leviable on Services in Nature of Software Development: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Purchase and sale of shares are Not Bogus: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Purchase-and-sale-of-shares-ITAT-deletes-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-sale-of-shares-Purchase-of-Shares-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Purchase and sale of shares are Not Bogus: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Lapse or Failure to Comply with CBLR does not Attracts Penalty Action u/s 114 and 114AA of Customs Act :CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Lapse-Failure-Comply-CBLR-Penalty-Customs-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Lapse or Failure to Comply with CBLR does not Attracts Penalty Action u/s 114 and 114AA of Customs Act :CESTAT [Read Order]")
Interest Paid towards Excess Claim of Refund of Duty Drawback is not Penalty or Fine: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore Bench held that interest paid towards excess claim of the refund of duty drawback is not penalty or fine. Assessee, Mahalasa Exports filed its...
![Interest Paid towards Excess Claim of Refund of Duty Drawback is not Penalty or Fine: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Interest-Paid-towards-Excess-Claim-of-Refund-Claim-of-Refund-of-Duty-Penalty-or-Fine-Excess-Claim-of-Refund-of-Duty-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Interest Paid towards Excess Claim of Refund of Duty Drawback is not Penalty or Fine: ITAT [Read Order]")
Availment of CENVAT Credit for Service Tax paid to Car Dealers for Violation of IRDAI Guidelines: CESTAT upholds Demand and Penalty [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) upheld the demand for CENVAT credit and penalty imposed for the wrongful availed credit on the ground of...
![Availment of CENVAT Credit for Service Tax paid to Car Dealers for Violation of IRDAI Guidelines: CESTAT upholds Demand and Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Availment-CENVAT-Credit-Service-Tax-paid-Car-Dealers-Violation-IRDAI-CESTAT-Demand-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Availment of CENVAT Credit for Service Tax paid to Car Dealers for Violation of IRDAI Guidelines: CESTAT upholds Demand and Penalty [Read Order]")
Absence of Continuity in action of AO and CIT(A): ITAT deletes Penalty imposed without sure about nature of Default [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi Bench deleted the penalty imposed without sure about the nature of default thus the bench observed absence of continuity in action of the assessing...
![Absence of Continuity in action of AO and CIT(A): ITAT deletes Penalty imposed without sure about nature of Default [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Absence-Continuity-action-AO-CITA-ITAT-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Absence of Continuity in action of AO and CIT(A): ITAT deletes Penalty imposed without sure about nature of Default [Read Order]")
CESTAT quashes Penalty Imposed for Confiscation of Hot rolled steel plates on Ground of Genuine Disclosure of Quantity and Weight of Imported Goods [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the penalty imposed for the confiscation of hot rolled steel plates on the ground of genuine disclosure...
![CESTAT quashes Penalty Imposed for Confiscation of Hot rolled steel plates on Ground of Genuine Disclosure of Quantity and Weight of Imported Goods [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/CESTAT-Quashes-Penalty-Imposed-CESTAT-Penalty-Confiscation-of-Hot-rolled-steel-plates-Genuine-Disclosure-of-Quantity-Weight-of-Imported-Goods-Hot-rolled-steel-plates-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT quashes Penalty Imposed for Confiscation of Hot rolled steel plates on Ground of Genuine Disclosure of Quantity and Weight of Imported Goods [Read Order]")
Failure to file ITR bonafidely and witness no Loss to Revenue as Proper Tax was already Paid: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]
The Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside penalty of Rs.5000 under Section 271F of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on grounds of non-filing of returns by the assessee bonafidely...
![Failure to file ITR bonafidely and witness no Loss to Revenue as Proper Tax was already Paid: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Failure-file-ITR-Loss-Revenue-Proper-Tax-already-Paid-ITAT-Penalty-taxscan-.jpg "Failure to file ITR bonafidely and witness no Loss to Revenue as Proper Tax was already Paid: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
Difference in Perception of Viewing Transaction not Amount to Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the penalty holding that the difference in perception of viewing transactions could not amount to inaccurate particulars. ...
![Difference in Perception of Viewing Transaction not Amount to Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Difference-Perception-Viewing-Transaction-Amount-Furnishing-Inaccurate-Particulars-ITAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Difference in Perception of Viewing Transaction not Amount to Furnishing of Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
Penalty Imposed for Non-payment of Service Tax under Category of “Management, Maintenance or Repair Service” without verifying Relevant Documents: CESTAT directs Re-consideration
The Chandigarh bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) directed re-consideration of the penalty imposed for the non-payment of service tax under the category of...
