![Bonafide Belief of Interest Income on Bank Deposits Eligible for Deduction u/s 80P : ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Interest-Income-on-Bank-Deposits-Interest-Income-Bank-Deposits-Deduction-ITAT-ITAT-Deletes-Penalty-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Bonafide Belief of Interest Income on Bank Deposits Eligible for Deduction u/s 80P : ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")
Bonafide Belief of Interest Income on Bank Deposits Eligible for Deduction u/s 80P : ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act 1961, as the...
![Audit Report not Filed within Stipulated Time Limit as Books not Given to Qualified CA:ITAT Upholds Penalty u/s 271B [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Audit-Report-Stipulated-Time-Limit-Time-Limit-not-Filed-within-Stipulated-Time-Limit-Books-not-Given-to-Qualified-CA-CA-Books-Qualified-CA-ITAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Audit Report not Filed within Stipulated Time Limit as Books not Given to Qualified CA:ITAT Upholds Penalty u/s 271B [Read Order]")
![No Penalty u/s 271AAA on Surrendered Income without Statement recorded under Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Penalty-No-Penalty-Surrendered-Income-Surrendered-Income-without-Statement-recorded-under-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Tax-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "No Penalty u/s 271AAA on Surrendered Income without Statement recorded under Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Cannot be Imposed when Income Determined on Estimate Basis: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act could not be imposed when income has been determined on an estimated...
![Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Cannot be Imposed when Income Determined on Estimate Basis: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Penalty-Income-Determined-Income-Determined-on-Estimate-Basis-Estimate-Basis-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Cannot be Imposed when Income Determined on Estimate Basis: ITAT [Read Order]")
Change of opinion & Change in Method of Accounting by assessee not Deemed Concealment of income: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench has upheld the deletion of penalty under Section 271(l)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 stating that a change of opinion of assessee or a change in...
![Change of opinion & Change in Method of Accounting by assessee not Deemed Concealment of income: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Change-in-Method-of-Accounting-by-assessee-Deemed-Concealment-of-income-Concealment-of-income-ITAT-upholds-Deletion-of-Penalty-Deletion-of-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Change of opinion & Change in Method of Accounting by assessee not Deemed Concealment of income: ITAT upholds Deletion of Penalty [Read Order]")
Penalty Imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act for Commission Payment without Proper Hearing: ITAT directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]
The Jaipur bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) directed the matter back to the assessing officer for re-adjudication for penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act...
![Penalty Imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act for Commission Payment without Proper Hearing: ITAT directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Penalty-imposed-IT-Act-Penalty-commission-payment-without-proper-hearing-commission-payment-ITAT-directs-re-adjudication-taxscan.jpg "Penalty Imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act for Commission Payment without Proper Hearing: ITAT directs Re-adjudication [Read Order]")
Provision of Section 269SS/269T of IT Act not applicable if AO found no Explanation Regarding Source of Cash Loans during Search Proceedings: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]
The Indore bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently held that provision of section 269SS/269T Income Tax Act 1961 should not be applicable if Assessing Officer (AO) not found...
![Provision of Section 269SS/269T of IT Act not applicable if AO found no Explanation Regarding Source of Cash Loans during Search Proceedings: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/IT-Act-not-applicable-IT-Act-Cash-Loans-Loan-source-of-Cash-Loans-during-search-proceedings-ITAT-deletes-penalty-ITAT-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Provision of Section 269SS/269T of IT Act not applicable if AO found no Explanation Regarding Source of Cash Loans during Search Proceedings: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not Leviable When no Inaccurate Particulars of Income are Furnished by the Assessee: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, held that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is not leviable when no...
![Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not Leviable When no Inaccurate Particulars of Income are Furnished by the Assessee: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Penalty-Inaccurate-Particulars-of-Income-are-Furnished-by-the-Assessee-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not Leviable When no Inaccurate Particulars of Income are Furnished by the Assessee: ITAT [Read Order]")
BREAKING: Audit of Shell Companies: NFRA Imposes 1 Crore Penalty and 2 Years Ban on CA Firm for Professional Misconduct [Read Order]
The National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) has banned the Chartered Accountants Firm Sundaresha and Associates for a period of two years from audit. The NFRA has also imposed a hefty penalty...
