![Expiry of E-way Bill does not Create Scope for Evasion, No Revenue Loss: Madras HC sets aside order demanding Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Expiry-of-E-way-Bill-E-way-Bill-Revenue-Loss-Madras-High-Court-demanding-Penalty-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Expiry of E-way Bill does not Create Scope for Evasion, No Revenue Loss: Madras HC sets aside order demanding Penalty [Read Order]")
Expiry of E-way Bill does not Create Scope for Evasion, No Revenue Loss: Madras HC sets aside order demanding Penalty [Read Order]
The High Court (HC) of Madras set aside the order demanding a penalty since the expiry of the E-way bill does not create scope for evasion and there...
![Fraudulent Availment of Excise Rebate: CESTAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Fraudulent-Availment-Excise-Rebate-CESTAT-Penalty-Excise-Service-Tax-Customs-Fraudulent-Availment-of-Excise-Rebate-Penalty-taxscan-.jpg "Fraudulent Availment of Excise Rebate: CESTAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]")
![Penalty Notice u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act Issued in a Stereotyped Manner Without Applying Mind Not Valid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Penalty-Notice-Penalty-Notice-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Tax-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty Notice u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act Issued in a Stereotyped Manner Without Applying Mind Not Valid: ITAT [Read Order]")
![No Penalty for Bonafide Mistakes in Income Tax Return filed without Assistance of Tax Consultant: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Penalty-Mistakes-Income-Tax-Return-Tax-Consultant-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Penalty for Bonafide Mistakes in Income Tax Return filed without Assistance of Tax Consultant: ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT deletes Income Tax Penalty against Trip Advisor [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/ITAT-Income-Tax-Penalty-Income-Tax-Tax-Trip-Advisor-taxscan.jpg "ITAT deletes Income Tax Penalty against Trip Advisor [Read Order]")
Inaction of AO in Disposing Adjournment Petition: ITAT Deletes Penalty for Non-Compliance with Notice u/s 142(1) [Read Order]
Pune bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) chaired by Viswanethra Ravi (Judicial Member) and Inturi Rama Rao (Accountant Member) deleted the penalty for non-compliance with the notice...
![Inaction of AO in Disposing Adjournment Petition: ITAT Deletes Penalty for Non-Compliance with Notice u/s 142(1) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Adjournment-Petition-Petition-ITAT-Penalty-Notice-taxscan-1.jpg "Inaction of AO in Disposing Adjournment Petition: ITAT Deletes Penalty for Non-Compliance with Notice u/s 142(1) [Read Order]")
Use of Notice Proforma of Levy Penalty u/s 271AAB without Mentioning Charge is Defective and Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Tribunal (ITAT) Kolkata Bench ruled that the notice proforma of levy penalty under section 271AAB of Income Tax Act, 1961 without mentioning the charge is defective and invalid. ...
![Use of Notice Proforma of Levy Penalty u/s 271AAB without Mentioning Charge is Defective and Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Use-of-Notice-Proforma-Levy-Penalty-u-s-271AAB-Charge-is-Defective-and-Invalid-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Use of Notice Proforma of Levy Penalty u/s 271AAB without Mentioning Charge is Defective and Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s. 114A imposable only for person who is liable to pay Duty or Interest under section 28: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that the penalty under section 114A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is imposable only for the person...
![Penalty u/s. 114A imposable only for person who is liable to pay Duty or Interest under section 28: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Penalty-pay-Duty-Interest-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s. 114A imposable only for person who is liable to pay Duty or Interest under section 28: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Payment of Tax and Penalty to Release Detained Goods Not “Admission”, Cannot be Sole Basis of GST Liability: Delhi HC [Read Order]
A division bench of the Delhi High Court has held that the payment of tax and penalty to release the detained goods shall not be treated as “admission” on the part of the assessee and the same cannot...
![Payment of Tax and Penalty to Release Detained Goods Not “Admission”, Cannot be Sole Basis of GST Liability: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Payment-of-Tax-Penalty-Goods-Payment-of-Tax-and-Penalty-Admission-GST-Liability-GST-Delhi-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "Payment of Tax and Penalty to Release Detained Goods Not “Admission”, Cannot be Sole Basis of GST Liability: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Repayment of Loan in Cash in excess of Rs.20,000: ITAT upholds Penalty u/s 271E of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Repayment-of-Loan-in-Cash-ITAT-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Repayment of Loan in Cash in excess of Rs.20,000: ITAT upholds Penalty u/s 271E of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Import of Urea on High Seas Sale from STE not violative of ITC policy: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 112(a)(i) [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the Import of Urea on high Seas Sale from State Trading Enterprises (STE) is not violative of...
![Import of Urea on High Seas Sale from STE not violative of ITC policy: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 112(a)(i) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Import-of-Urea-High-Seas-Sale-STE-ITC-policy-Urea-on-High-Seas-Sale-CESTAT-Penalty-Import-of-Urea-on-High-Seas-Sale-taxscan.jpg "Import of Urea on High Seas Sale from STE not violative of ITC policy: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/s 112(a)(i) [Read Order]")
CESTAT confirms Composite Penalty When Charges pertain to period prior to and after introduction of Section 11 AC of Central Excise Act [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), confirmed composite penalty when charges pertained to period prior to and after introduction of Section 11 AC...
![CESTAT confirms Composite Penalty When Charges pertain to period prior to and after introduction of Section 11 AC of Central Excise Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/CESTAT-Penalty-pertain-period-Central-Excise-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "CESTAT confirms Composite Penalty When Charges pertain to period prior to and after introduction of Section 11 AC of Central Excise Act [Read Order]")