![Cancellation of Income Tax Penalty automatically quashes Criminal Proceedings u/s 276: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Income-Tax-Penalty-Income-Tax-Tax-Penalty-Criminal-Proceeding-Allahabad-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "Cancellation of Income Tax Penalty automatically quashes Criminal Proceedings u/s 276: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
Cancellation of Income Tax Penalty automatically quashes Criminal Proceedings u/s 276: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
A Single Bench of Allahabad High Court has recently held that criminal proceedings arising out of orders of penalty will be quashed as soon as the...
![Fraudulent Import of Vehicles as Brand-New Vehicles: CESTAT reduces Excessive Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Fraudulent-Import-Vehicles-Brand-New-Vehicles-CESTAT-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Excessive-Penalty-Penalty-Fraudulent-Import-of-Vehicles-taxscan.jpg "Fraudulent Import of Vehicles as Brand-New Vehicles: CESTAT reduces Excessive Penalty [Read Order]")
![Payment of 25% of Penalty is adequate to Compensate Revenue Department: CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Rule 15(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Payment-Revenue-Department-CESTAT-Penalty-CENVAT-Credit-Rules-taxscan.jpg "Payment of 25% of Penalty is adequate to Compensate Revenue Department: CESTAT sets aside Penalty under Rule 15(2) of CENVAT Credit Rules [Read Order]")
![Consification of Goods and Penalty not permissible When Imported Goods are not mis declared: CESTAT rules in favour of Surya Exim Ltd [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Consification-of-goods-and-penalty-not-permissible-when-imported-goods-are-not-mis-declared-CESTAT-rules-in-favour-of-Surya-Exim-ltd-TAXSCAN.jpg "Consification of Goods and Penalty not permissible When Imported Goods are not mis declared: CESTAT rules in favour of Surya Exim Ltd [Read Order]")
![Bona fide belief of Area based exemption from Central Excise Duty: CESTAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Central-Excise-Duty-CESTAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Bona fide belief of Area based exemption from Central Excise Duty: CESTAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
![No Penalty or Conviction can be based merely on Speculations: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/No-Penalty-or-Conviction-can-be-based-merely-on-Speculations-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Penalty or Conviction can be based merely on Speculations: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Showing less LTCG by making false claim u/s 54EC without making investment: ITAT confirms penalty [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) confirmed penalty as there was showing less Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) by making false claim under Section 54EC without making...
![Showing less LTCG by making false claim u/s 54EC without making investment: ITAT confirms penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Showing-Less-LTCG-by-making-False-Claim-without-making-investment-ITAT-deletes-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Showing less LTCG by making false claim u/s 54EC without making investment: ITAT confirms penalty [Read Order]")
Making Incorrect Deduction not amount to Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars u/s 271 (1)(c): ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Delhi Bench deleted the penalty as incorrect deduction does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act,...
![Making Incorrect Deduction not amount to Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars u/s 271 (1)(c): ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/ITAT-deletes-Penalty-ITAT-Penalty-Deduction-Taxscan.jpg "Making Incorrect Deduction not amount to Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars u/s 271 (1)(c): ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
![Payment of TDS with Interest to ensure No Loss to Revenue: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Payment-TDS-Interest-Revenue-Penalty-ITAT-Payment-of-TDS-taxscan.jpg "Payment of TDS with Interest to ensure No Loss to Revenue: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
No Income Tax Penalty u/s 44A and 44B if the Commission receipt falls below Threshold Limit: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi Bench recently in an appeal held that penalty would not be imposed under Section 44A and 44B Income Tax Act, 1961 if the commission receipt of assessee...
![No Income Tax Penalty u/s 44A and 44B if the Commission receipt falls below Threshold Limit: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/No-Income-Tax-Penalty-Commission-receipt-falls-below-Threshold-Limit-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Income Tax Penalty u/s 44A and 44B if the Commission receipt falls below Threshold Limit: ITAT [Read Order]")
Cash Receipt of Less than Rs. 2L from different Persons on different Dates would not attract S. 269ST of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted a penalty under section 271DA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by holding that the cash receipt of less than two lakh rupees...
![Cash Receipt of Less than Rs. 2L from different Persons on different Dates would not attract S. 269ST of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Cash-Receipt-of-Less-Different-Persons-on-Different-Dates-would-not-attract-of-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-deletes-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Cash Receipt of Less than Rs. 2L from different Persons on different Dates would not attract S. 269ST of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
![Unauthorised Modification in Shipping Bill: CESTAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Shipping-Bill-CESTAT-Penalty-CESTAT-upholds-Penalty-Modification-in-Shipping-Bill-taxscan.jpg "Unauthorised Modification in Shipping Bill: CESTAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]")