![Placing Orders with Importers does not amount to Import: CESTAT quashes vague SCN and sets aside Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Importers-CESTAT-SCN-Show-Cause-Notice-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Placing Orders with Importers does not amount to Import: CESTAT quashes vague SCN and sets aside Penalty [Read Order]")
Placing Orders with Importers does not amount to Import: CESTAT quashes vague SCN and sets aside Penalty [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT )has recently held that placing order with importers does not...
![No Service Tax Leviable on Services to Members by Society prior to 2012: CESTAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/No-Service-Tax-Leviable-on-Services-to-Members-by-Society-prior-to-2012-CESTAT-deletes-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Service Tax Leviable on Services to Members by Society prior to 2012: CESTAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
![NCLAT issues Notice to Make My Trip, GoIbibo in Appeal against Penalty imposed by CCI on OYO [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/NCLAT-Notice-NCLAT-issues-Notice-GoIbibo-Penalty-CCI-OYO-taxscan.jpg "NCLAT issues Notice to Make My Trip, GoIbibo in Appeal against Penalty imposed by CCI on OYO [Read Order]")
![Penalty under Rule 26 Central Excise Rules cannot be imposed for issuance of bogus LR when period involved is prior to amendment: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Penalty-Central-Excise-Rules-Central-Excise-bogus-LR-amendment-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty under Rule 26 Central Excise Rules cannot be imposed for issuance of bogus LR when period involved is prior to amendment: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Onus is on Revenue to prove that Goods are Smuggled in Nature: CESTAT quashes demand of Customs Duty and Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Smuggled-goods-CESTAT-customs-duty-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Onus is on Revenue to prove that Goods are Smuggled in Nature: CESTAT quashes demand of Customs Duty and Penalty [Read Order]")
![No Active Role for use of IEC code for Monetary Consideration: CESTAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/IEC-code-Monetary-Consideration-CESTAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "No Active Role for use of IEC code for Monetary Consideration: CESTAT deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
Amount for Compounding of Offence under GST Act shall Not Exceed Penalty Leviable: Bombay HC Quashes Order [Read Order]
The High Court of Bombay High Court at Goa, while quashing an order for compounding of offence, has held that the amount for the compounding of offence under the GST Act shall not exceed the maximum...
![Amount for Compounding of Offence under GST Act shall Not Exceed Penalty Leviable: Bombay HC Quashes Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/GST-Act-GST-Penalty-Bombay-High-Court-Bombay-HC-Quashes-Order-taxscan.jpg "Amount for Compounding of Offence under GST Act shall Not Exceed Penalty Leviable: Bombay HC Quashes Order [Read Order]")
Relief to Citibank: CESTAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 112 Customs Act on purchase of ATMs made within India [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) at Mumbai has recently held that the penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 is not valid for purchase of ATMs and...
![Relief to Citibank: CESTAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 112 Customs Act on purchase of ATMs made within India [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/CESTAT-Citibank-Penalty-CESTAT-quashes-Penalty-Customs-Act-ATM-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Citibank: CESTAT quashes Penalty imposed u/s 112 Customs Act on purchase of ATMs made within India [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 114A of Customs Act not permissible in the Absence of Evidence which proves the Use of Forged Scrips to clear Goods: CESTAT
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that penalty u/s 114A of the Customs Act,1962 is not permissible in the absence of evidence which proves...
Penalty on wrong CENVAT Credit availed solely based upon Statements cannot be confirmed unless stood the test u/s 9(D) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Penalty on wrong CENVAT credit availed solely based upon statements cannot be confirmed unless stood...
![Penalty on wrong CENVAT Credit availed solely based upon Statements cannot be confirmed unless stood the test u/s 9(D) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Penalty-CENVAT-Credit-Statements-confirmed-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty on wrong CENVAT Credit availed solely based upon Statements cannot be confirmed unless stood the test u/s 9(D) of Central Excise Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Lapse of Six Months on Penalty proceedings violation of Cash Transactions u/s 269SS: Delhi HC quashes Penalty [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court quashed penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the ground that there was lapse of six months on penalty proceedings on violation of cash transactions under...
![Lapse of Six Months on Penalty proceedings violation of Cash Transactions u/s 269SS: Delhi HC quashes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Penalty-penalty-proceedings-Cash-Transaction-violation-of-cash-transactions-Delhi-HC-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Lapse of Six Months on Penalty proceedings violation of Cash Transactions u/s 269SS: Delhi HC quashes Penalty [Read Order]")