![ITAT deletes Penalty since Non-Deduction of TDS due to Absence of Invoices [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ITAT-Penalty-Non-Deduction-TDS-Absence-Invoices-Taxscan.jpeg "ITAT deletes Penalty since Non-Deduction of TDS due to Absence of Invoices [Read Order]")
ITAT deletes Penalty since Non-Deduction of TDS due to Absence of Invoices [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted a penalty order under section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by holding...
![Dept failed to consider Reply to Income Tax Notice: Delhi High Court quashes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Department-Income-Tax-Notice-Income-tax-Notice-Delhi-High-Court-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Dept failed to consider Reply to Income Tax Notice: Delhi High Court quashes Penalty [Read Order]")
![Partial Relief to Falcon India: CESTAT deletes Penalty, Upholds Revocation of License [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Partial-Relief-Falcon-India-CESTAT-deletes-Penalty-Revocation-License-Taxscan.jpeg "Partial Relief to Falcon India: CESTAT deletes Penalty, Upholds Revocation of License [Read Order]")
![ITAT confirms Income Tax Penalty against Doctor for not maintaining daily case register and Inventory of Medicine Stock [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ITAT-Income-Tax-Penalty-Doctor-daily-case-register-Inventory-of-Medicine-Stock-medicine-stock-medicine-case-register-income-tax-penalty-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT confirms Income Tax Penalty against Doctor for not maintaining daily case register and Inventory of Medicine Stock [Read Order]")
![Penalty proceedings in cases where pendency could not be created on ITBA because of technical reasons or cases not having a PAN to be excluded from Faceless Penalty Scheme: CBDT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Penalty-ITBA-PAN-Faceless-Penalty-Scheme-CBDT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty proceedings in cases where pendency could not be created on ITBA because of technical reasons or cases not having a PAN to be excluded from Faceless Penalty Scheme: CBDT [Read Order]")
Set back to Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages: CESTAT upholds Penalty for recovery of Cenvat Credit [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), in a setback to Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages, dismissed the appeal filed by the Company and upheld an order of the...
![Set back to Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages: CESTAT upholds Penalty for recovery of Cenvat Credit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Hindustan-Coca-Cola-Beverages-CESTA-Cenvat-Credit-taxscan.jpeg "Set back to Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages: CESTAT upholds Penalty for recovery of Cenvat Credit [Read Order]")
Consideration given for accessing Database of the Assessee cannot be treated as Royalty: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi has held that the transaction under consideration is for provision of accessing database of the assesse, hence the same cannot be considered as ‘Royalty’...
![Consideration given for accessing Database of the Assessee cannot be treated as Royalty: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Consideration-Assesse-Royalty-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Consideration given for accessing Database of the Assessee cannot be treated as Royalty: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Amount Deposited in the Absence of Requisite SCN is liable to be Refunded: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Amount-Deposit-Requisite-SCN-Refunded-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Amount Deposited in the Absence of Requisite SCN is liable to be Refunded: CESTAT [Read Order]")
GST Registration shall be restored on Payment of Tax, Penalty and Uploading of Returns: Madras HC [Read Judgment]
In a major relief to the taxpayers facing problems with restoration of GST registration even after payment of tax amount, penalty and filing of GST registration, the Madras High Court directed the...
![GST Registration shall be restored on Payment of Tax, Penalty and Uploading of Returns: Madras HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/GST-Registration-Payment-of-Tax-Penalty-Returns-Madras-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST Registration shall be restored on Payment of Tax, Penalty and Uploading of Returns: Madras HC [Read Judgment]")
Adjudicating Authority committed error by not sanctioning GST Refund as 10% Deposit required for Filing Second Appeal inclusive of 7.5% pre-deposit made for First Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Adjudicating Authority committed error by not sanctioning GST refund claim of pre-deposit, penalty...
![Adjudicating Authority committed error by not sanctioning GST Refund as 10% Deposit required for Filing Second Appeal inclusive of 7.5% pre-deposit made for First Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Adjudicating-Authority-GST-deposits-pre-deposit-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Adjudicating Authority committed error by not sanctioning GST Refund as 10% Deposit required for Filing Second Appeal inclusive of 7.5% pre-deposit made for First Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Allahabad HC quashes order creating demand of GST, Interest, and Penalty as no opportunity of hearing granted to Assessee [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court has quashed the order creating demand of GST, interest, and penalty as no opportunity of hearing granted to Assessee. The petitioner submits that the impugned...
![Allahabad HC quashes order creating demand of GST, Interest, and Penalty as no opportunity of hearing granted to Assessee [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/03/500x300_2041078-state-authorities-trading-community-allahabad-hc-wrongful-seizure-consignment-gst-authorities-taxscanjpg.webp "Allahabad HC quashes order creating demand of GST, Interest, and Penalty as no opportunity of hearing granted to Assessee [Read Order]")
![CIT cannot direct AO to initiate Penalty while exercising Revisional Jurisdiction: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/CIT-AO-Penalty-Revisional-Jurisdiction-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "CIT cannot direct AO to initiate Penalty while exercising Revisional Jurisdiction: ITAT [Read Order]")