![GST Registration shall be restored on Payment of Tax, Penalty and Uploading of Returns: Madras HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/GST-Registration-Payment-of-Tax-Penalty-Returns-Madras-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST Registration shall be restored on Payment of Tax, Penalty and Uploading of Returns: Madras HC [Read Judgment]")
GST Registration shall be restored on Payment of Tax, Penalty and Uploading of Returns: Madras HC [Read Judgment]
In a major relief to the taxpayers facing problems with restoration of GST registration even after payment of tax amount, penalty and filing of GST...
![Adjudicating Authority committed error by not sanctioning GST Refund as 10% Deposit required for Filing Second Appeal inclusive of 7.5% pre-deposit made for First Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Adjudicating-Authority-GST-deposits-pre-deposit-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Adjudicating Authority committed error by not sanctioning GST Refund as 10% Deposit required for Filing Second Appeal inclusive of 7.5% pre-deposit made for First Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Allahabad HC quashes order creating demand of GST, Interest, and Penalty as no opportunity of hearing granted to Assessee [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/03/2041078-state-authorities-trading-community-allahabad-hc-wrongful-seizure-consignment-gst-authorities-taxscanjpg.webp "Allahabad HC quashes order creating demand of GST, Interest, and Penalty as no opportunity of hearing granted to Assessee [Read Order]")
![CIT cannot direct AO to initiate Penalty while exercising Revisional Jurisdiction: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/CIT-AO-Penalty-Revisional-Jurisdiction-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "CIT cannot direct AO to initiate Penalty while exercising Revisional Jurisdiction: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Allahabad HC imposes Penalty on GST Dept. for Unnecessary Harassment for Copy of Electricity Bill for granting GST Registration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/GST-Officer-Allahabad-High-Court-penalty-GST-Department-Unnecessary-harassment-for-copy-electricity-bill-GST-Registration-Taxscan.jpg "Allahabad HC imposes Penalty on GST Dept. for Unnecessary Harassment for Copy of Electricity Bill for granting GST Registration [Read Order]")
CESTAT quashes Penalty as no demand was made in SCN for alleged wrongful availment of CENVAT Credit [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed the penalty as no demand was made in Show Cause Notice for alleged wrongful availment of CENVAT credit. ...
![CESTAT quashes Penalty as no demand was made in SCN for alleged wrongful availment of CENVAT Credit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/CESTAT-Penalty-SCN-wrongful-availment-CENVAT-credit-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT quashes Penalty as no demand was made in SCN for alleged wrongful availment of CENVAT Credit [Read Order]")
Tamil Nadu Govt. issues instructions regarding Levy of Penalty for Minor defects in E-Way Bill not intended for GST Evasion [Read Circular]
The Tamil Nadu Government has issued the instructions regarding Levy of penalty for minor defects in E-Way Bill not intended for GST Evasion. “This circular has been issued at the nascent stage of...
![Tamil Nadu Govt. issues instructions regarding Levy of Penalty for Minor defects in E-Way Bill not intended for GST Evasion [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Tamil-Nadu-Government-Levy-of-penalty-minor-defects-E-Way-Bill-GST-Evasion-Taxscan.jpeg "Tamil Nadu Govt. issues instructions regarding Levy of Penalty for Minor defects in E-Way Bill not intended for GST Evasion [Read Circular]")
Proposal for Confiscation, Penalty cannot be segregated from Customs duty demand: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax (CESTAT) ruled that Proposal for confiscation, the penalty cannot be segregated from Customs duty demand. The appellant, Dhiren Enterprise has...
![Proposal for Confiscation, Penalty cannot be segregated from Customs duty demand: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/confiscation-penalty-Customs-duty-demand-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpg "Proposal for Confiscation, Penalty cannot be segregated from Customs duty demand: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Order of Confiscation with option for Redemption Fine and Penalty for not having IEC number is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the order of confiscation with an option for redemption fine and penalty for importer not having IEC...
![Order of Confiscation with option for Redemption Fine and Penalty for not having IEC number is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Order-of-Confiscation-fine-penalty-IEC-number-CESTAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Order of Confiscation with option for Redemption Fine and Penalty for not having IEC number is Invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
ITAT deletes Penalty since Statutory condition of citing specific reasons are not provided by AO [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be survived if the Assessing Officer does...
![ITAT deletes Penalty since Statutory condition of citing specific reasons are not provided by AO [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/ITAT-Penalty-AO-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT deletes Penalty since Statutory condition of citing specific reasons are not provided by AO [Read Order]")
Limitation Period for Penalty Order does not apply to Penalty Proceeding u/s 271D & 271E: ITAT [Read Order]
The Banglore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the limitation period for penalty order does not apply to penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E of the Income Tax Act. ...
![Limitation Period for Penalty Order does not apply to Penalty Proceeding u/s 271D & 271E: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/penalty-proceeding-ITAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Limitation Period for Penalty Order does not apply to Penalty Proceeding u/s 271D & 271E: ITAT [Read Order]")
Patna High Court quashes demand of GST, Interest, and Penalty as No Opportunity of Hearing was afforded [Read Order]
The Patna High Court quashed the demand of GST, interest and penalty as no opportunity of hearing was afforded. The petitioner, Shashikant Singh has raised several contentions, including non-...
![Patna High Court quashes demand of GST, Interest, and Penalty as No Opportunity of Hearing was afforded [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Patna-High-Court-GST-Penalty-interest-Taxscan.jpg "Patna High Court quashes demand of GST, Interest, and Penalty as No Opportunity of Hearing was afforded [Read Order]")