![ITAT Denies Immunity from Penalty as Application u/s 270AA Not Filed in Prescribed Format [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/24/500x300_2068552-itat-itat-ahmedabad-income-tax-appellate-tribunal-itat-cancels-penalty-taxscan.webp "ITAT Denies Immunity from Penalty as Application u/s 270AA Not Filed in Prescribed Format [Read Order]")
ITAT Denies Immunity from Penalty as Application u/s 270AA Not Filed in Prescribed Format [Read Order]
The Cuttack Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dismissed the appeal of the appellant-assessee, who had sought immunity from penalty under...
![CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty for Non-Membership as Customs Broker Obtained Association Membership Before SCN Was Served [Read Oder]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/24/250x150_2068456-quantum-assessment-1.webp "CESTAT Sets Aside Penalty for Non-Membership as Customs Broker Obtained Association Membership Before SCN Was Served [Read Oder]")
![SEBI Not Required to Issue Separate Demand Notices for Interest Recovery: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/250x150_2068132-sebi-sebi-not-required-to-issue-separate-demand-notices-separate-demand-notices-taxscan.webp "SEBI Not Required to Issue Separate Demand Notices for Interest Recovery: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]")
![Assessee’s Non-Compliance before AO & CIT(A): ITAT slaps ₹5,000 Costs and Remands ₹3.2 Cr Income Tax Addition, ₹1.07 Cr Penalty Issue [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/250x150_2068072-income-tax-addition-penalty-issue-taxscan.webp "Assessee’s Non-Compliance before AO & CIT(A): ITAT slaps ₹5,000 Costs and Remands ₹3.2 Cr Income Tax Addition, ₹1.07 Cr Penalty Issue [Read Order]")
![MoU proves Taxpayer’s Active Role in Managing EOU: CESTAT upholds Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/250x150_2067975-mou-proves-taxpayers-active-role-in-managing-eou-taxpayers-active-role-in-managing-eou-taxscan.webp "MoU proves Taxpayer’s Active Role in Managing EOU: CESTAT upholds Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]")
![Half Yearly Tax Digest 2025: Supreme Court and High Court Cases [Part XVII]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/21/500x300_2067182-half-yearly-tax-digest-2025-supreme-court-and-high-court-cases-supreme-court-cases-taxscan.webp "Half Yearly Tax Digest 2025: Supreme Court and High Court Cases [Part XVII]")
Clerical Error in E-Way Bill Not Tax Evasion: Allahabad HC Quashes Penalty, Directs Refund with 4% Interest If Any Amount Deposited [Read Order]
In an important ruling, related to the fact that clerical mistakes do not imply tax evasion, the Allahabad High Court quashed the penalty order, holding that a minor typographical error in the...
![Clerical Error in E-Way Bill Not Tax Evasion: Allahabad HC Quashes Penalty, Directs Refund with 4% Interest If Any Amount Deposited [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/22/500x300_2067713-e-way-bill-1.webp "Clerical Error in E-Way Bill Not Tax Evasion: Allahabad HC Quashes Penalty, Directs Refund with 4% Interest If Any Amount Deposited [Read Order]")
CESTAT dismisses Mittal Corp’s appeal despite CIRP Proceedings, upholds Excise Duty and Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has dismissed the appeal filed by Mittal Corp Limited, upholding the confirmation of Central Excise duty...
![CESTAT dismisses Mittal Corp’s appeal despite CIRP Proceedings, upholds Excise Duty and Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/22/500x300_2067550-cestat-dismisses-mittal-corps-appeal-cestat-mittal-corps-limited-taxscan.webp "CESTAT dismisses Mittal Corp’s appeal despite CIRP Proceedings, upholds Excise Duty and Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]")
Provisions of IPC not directly applicable to Customs Act: CESTAT Drops Penalty imposed u/s 112(a) of Customs Act in absence of intention to evade tax [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Chennai bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT) held that provisions of the IPC are not directly applicable to the Customs Act and dropped...
![Provisions of IPC not directly applicable to Customs Act: CESTAT Drops Penalty imposed u/s 112(a) of Customs Act in absence of intention to evade tax [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/21/500x300_2067129-delhi-high-court-gold-seizure-case-taxscan-1.webp "Provisions of IPC not directly applicable to Customs Act: CESTAT Drops Penalty imposed u/s 112(a) of Customs Act in absence of intention to evade tax [Read Order]")
GST Order issued imposing Penalty u/s 74 without Granting Hearing Opportunity: Madras HC sets aside order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has set aside a penalty order issued under Section 74 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax (TNGST) Act, 2017, for having been passed without affording a personal hearing to...
![GST Order issued imposing Penalty u/s 74 without Granting Hearing Opportunity: Madras HC sets aside order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/19/500x300_2065424-penalty-tax-is-paid-madras-hc-gst-dept-appeal-taxscan.webp "GST Order issued imposing Penalty u/s 74 without Granting Hearing Opportunity: Madras HC sets aside order [Read Order]")
Mere Absence of Activity at Principal Place Does Not Prove Fake Invoice or Lack of Goods Ownership: Allahabad HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Allahabad High Court has quashed a GST (Goods and Services Tax) penalty order imposed for alleged fake invoicing and wrongful ownership on the mere basis of inactivity at...
![Mere Absence of Activity at Principal Place Does Not Prove Fake Invoice or Lack of Goods Ownership: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/18/500x300_2064957-fake-invoices-1.webp "Mere Absence of Activity at Principal Place Does Not Prove Fake Invoice or Lack of Goods Ownership: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
ITAT Allows Carry Forward of Loss, Deletes Late Fee as Partner Filed Return Within Extended Due Date u/s 92E [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the carry forward of long-term capital loss and deleted the late filing fee of Rs. 5,000, holding that the return was filed within...
![ITAT Allows Carry Forward of Loss, Deletes Late Fee as Partner Filed Return Within Extended Due Date u/s 92E [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/18/500x300_2064909-carry-forward-of-loss-.webp "ITAT Allows Carry Forward of Loss, Deletes Late Fee as Partner Filed Return Within Extended Due Date u/s 92E [Read Order]")