![CESTAT dismisses Mittal Corp’s appeal despite CIRP Proceedings, upholds Excise Duty and Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/22/2067550-cestat-dismisses-mittal-corps-appeal-cestat-mittal-corps-limited-taxscan.webp "CESTAT dismisses Mittal Corp’s appeal despite CIRP Proceedings, upholds Excise Duty and Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]")
CESTAT dismisses Mittal Corp’s appeal despite CIRP Proceedings, upholds Excise Duty and Penalty for Clandestine Removal of Goods [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has dismissed the appeal filed by Mittal Corp Limited,...
![Provisions of IPC not directly applicable to Customs Act: CESTAT Drops Penalty imposed u/s 112(a) of Customs Act in absence of intention to evade tax [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/21/2067129-delhi-high-court-gold-seizure-case-taxscan-1.webp "Provisions of IPC not directly applicable to Customs Act: CESTAT Drops Penalty imposed u/s 112(a) of Customs Act in absence of intention to evade tax [Read Order]")
![GST Order issued imposing Penalty u/s 74 without Granting Hearing Opportunity: Madras HC sets aside order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/19/2065424-penalty-tax-is-paid-madras-hc-gst-dept-appeal-taxscan.webp "GST Order issued imposing Penalty u/s 74 without Granting Hearing Opportunity: Madras HC sets aside order [Read Order]")
![Mere Absence of Activity at Principal Place Does Not Prove Fake Invoice or Lack of Goods Ownership: Allahabad HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/18/2064957-fake-invoices-1.webp "Mere Absence of Activity at Principal Place Does Not Prove Fake Invoice or Lack of Goods Ownership: Allahabad HC [Read Order]")
![ITAT Allows Carry Forward of Loss, Deletes Late Fee as Partner Filed Return Within Extended Due Date u/s 92E [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/18/2064909-carry-forward-of-loss-.webp "ITAT Allows Carry Forward of Loss, Deletes Late Fee as Partner Filed Return Within Extended Due Date u/s 92E [Read Order]")
Temporary Storage Outside Bonded Area is Not Unauthorized Removal: CESTAT Quashes Customs Confiscation and Penalty [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the temporary placement of goods outside a licensed bonded warehouse does not amount to unauthorized...
![Temporary Storage Outside Bonded Area is Not Unauthorized Removal: CESTAT Quashes Customs Confiscation and Penalty [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/2064475-confiscation-penalty-customs-taxscan.webp "Temporary Storage Outside Bonded Area is Not Unauthorized Removal: CESTAT Quashes Customs Confiscation and Penalty [Read Order]")
Deduction Claim on Unpaid Ad-hoc Bonus from AY 1984-85: Bombay HC Quashes ₹12L Income Tax Penalty from 2002 ITAT Order citing Plausibility [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court recently set aside a penalty of ₹12,82,700 imposed on Carona Limited, noting that merely claiming deduction on unpaid ad-hoc bonus could not attract penalty under Section...
![Deduction Claim on Unpaid Ad-hoc Bonus from AY 1984-85: Bombay HC Quashes ₹12L Income Tax Penalty from 2002 ITAT Order citing Plausibility [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/14/2063729-deduction-deduction-claim-deduction-claim-on-unpaid-ad-hoc-bonus-ad-hoc-bonus-taxscan.webp "Deduction Claim on Unpaid Ad-hoc Bonus from AY 1984-85: Bombay HC Quashes ₹12L Income Tax Penalty from 2002 ITAT Order citing Plausibility [Read Order]")
Uttarakhand HC Allows Revocation of GST Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns, Citing Identical Earlier Orders [Read Order]
The High Court of Uttarakhand, allowed the petitioner to seek revocation of Goods and Service Tax (GST) registration cancelled for non-filing of returns, noting that the issue was identical to ...
![Uttarakhand HC Allows Revocation of GST Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns, Citing Identical Earlier Orders [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/12/2063134-gst-cancellation-taxscan.webp "Uttarakhand HC Allows Revocation of GST Cancellation for Non-Filing of Returns, Citing Identical Earlier Orders [Read Order]")
₹24 Lakh Tax, Penalty and Interest against Notice Demanding ₹4 Lakh: Allahabad HC quashes GST Order Demand in Excess of Amount in Notice [Read Order]
The Allahabad HighCourt recently set aside a Goods and Services Tax (GST) demand order amounting to over ₹24 lakh upon finding that the demand was vastly in excess of the amount specified in the...
![₹24 Lakh Tax, Penalty and Interest against Notice Demanding ₹4 Lakh: Allahabad HC quashes GST Order Demand in Excess of Amount in Notice [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/11/2062686-penalty-and-interest-penalty-interest-penalty-and-interest-against-notice-demanding-allahabad-hc-taxscan.webp "₹24 Lakh Tax, Penalty and Interest against Notice Demanding ₹4 Lakh: Allahabad HC quashes GST Order Demand in Excess of Amount in Notice [Read Order]")
Business Closed, Unaware of GST Notices: Madras HC allows to Contest Order on Payment of Dues without Interest and Penalty [Read Order]
Subject to depositing the entire GST due without penalty and interest, the court was permitted to contest the order in fresh.The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court recently permitted an assessee...
![Business Closed, Unaware of GST Notices: Madras HC allows to Contest Order on Payment of Dues without Interest and Penalty [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/09/2062047-business-closed-unaware-gst-notices-madras-hc-contest-order-payment-of-dues-interest-and-penalty-taxscan.webp "Business Closed, Unaware of GST Notices: Madras HC allows to Contest Order on Payment of Dues without Interest and Penalty [Read Order]")
Company Reversed Wrongfully Availed CENVAT Credit with Interest and Paid Penalty: CESTAT Quashes SCN Invoking Extended Period [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the extended period of limitation under the service tax law cannot be invoked when the assessee has...
![Company Reversed Wrongfully Availed CENVAT Credit with Interest and Paid Penalty: CESTAT Quashes SCN Invoking Extended Period [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/08/2061465-company-reversed-wrongfully-availed-cenvat-credit-company-reversed-wrongfully-availed-taxscan.webp "Company Reversed Wrongfully Availed CENVAT Credit with Interest and Paid Penalty: CESTAT Quashes SCN Invoking Extended Period [Read Order]")