![CESTAT Rejects Revenue’s Appeal, Upholds Classification of ‘Martech DHA’ as Final: No Justification for Re-litigation, Rules Tribunal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/06/500x300_2041483-revenues-appeal-rejection.webp "CESTAT Rejects Revenue’s Appeal, Upholds Classification of ‘Martech DHA’ as Final: No Justification for Re-litigation, Rules Tribunal [Read Order]")
CESTAT Rejects Revenue’s Appeal, Upholds Classification of ‘Martech DHA’ as Final: No Justification for Re-litigation, Rules Tribunal [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dismissed an appeal filed by the Revenue...
![Retrospective Amendments Inapplicable to Old Imports Where No Bond or Bank Guarantee was Executed: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Bank-Guarantee-site-img.jpg "Retrospective Amendments Inapplicable to Old Imports Where No Bond or Bank Guarantee was Executed: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty u/s 112(a)(ii) of Customs Act cannot be imposed on short paid duty: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Penalty-CESTAT-Taxscan-1.jpg "Penalty u/s 112(a)(ii) of Customs Act cannot be imposed on short paid duty: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Mere Non-Disclosure without Deliberate Evasion Not Enough: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 2 Crore Penalty on Former Managing Director [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/penalty-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Mere Non-Disclosure without Deliberate Evasion Not Enough: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 2 Crore Penalty on Former Managing Director [Read Order]")
![Customs Brokers License Revocation Overturned as CESTAT Finds No Evidence of Violation of Regulation 10(k) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Remands-Case-Remands-Case-Remands-Case-AO-for-Fresh-Order-Lack-of-Opportunity-Present-Evidence-Evidence-taxscan.jpg "Customs Brokers License Revocation Overturned as CESTAT Finds No Evidence of Violation of Regulation 10(k) [Read Order]")
![Document Name being ‘Debit Note is no Reason to Deny CENVAT Credit to Vodafone: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/CESTAT-CESTAT-Allahabad-Customs-Vodafone-CENVAT-Credit-TAXSCAN.jpg "Document Name being ‘Debit Note is no Reason to Deny CENVAT Credit to Vodafone: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Bombay HC rejects faulty affidavit filed by Customs Officer, ordered fresh filing by September 20 [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court (HC), in a recent ruling, rejected the affidavit produced by the Customs Officer. The Bombay HC was satisfied that the respondent Surgive Mehra may not even have read the...
No Customs Duty on Hybrid/Pure Matrix Cards for PTN Equipment which are Parts of Goods: CESTAT Rules in Favour of Vi [Read Order]
While Quashing Customs Duty against Vodafone idea, the Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) has held that Hybrid/Pure Matrix Cards for PTN Equipment would be...
![No Customs Duty on Hybrid/Pure Matrix Cards for PTN Equipment which are Parts of Goods: CESTAT Rules in Favour of Vi [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/CESTAT-CESTAT-Delhi-Customs-Duty-Customs-Duty-on-Hybrid-Matrix-Cards-customs-duty-on-pure-matrix-cards-taxscan.jpg "No Customs Duty on Hybrid/Pure Matrix Cards for PTN Equipment which are Parts of Goods: CESTAT Rules in Favour of Vi [Read Order]")
Address Discrepancy and Lack of Providing Hearing Opportunity Invalidates Customs Order: Madras HC directs to issue SCN to Correct Address [Read Order]
The Madras High Court, recognizing the discrepancy in addresses and the absence of a fair hearing opportunity, has invalidated the customs order. Consequently, the court has directed the authorities...
![Address Discrepancy and Lack of Providing Hearing Opportunity Invalidates Customs Order: Madras HC directs to issue SCN to Correct Address [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Address-Discrepancy-Providing-Hearing-Opportunity-Customs-Order-Madras-HC-SCN-TAXSCAN.jpg "Address Discrepancy and Lack of Providing Hearing Opportunity Invalidates Customs Order: Madras HC directs to issue SCN to Correct Address [Read Order]")
Direction to Credit Customs Refund allowed to Consumer Welfare Fund based on unjust Enrichment without providing Opportunity to Hearing: Delhi HC Remands Matter [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court observed that the direction to credit customs refund allowed to consumer welfare fund based on unjust enrichment without providing an opportunity for a hearing is invalid and...
![Direction to Credit Customs Refund allowed to Consumer Welfare Fund based on unjust Enrichment without providing Opportunity to Hearing: Delhi HC Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Delhi-High-Court-Customs-Refund-Consumer-Welfare-Fund-Unjust-Enrichment-TAXSCAN.jpg "Direction to Credit Customs Refund allowed to Consumer Welfare Fund based on unjust Enrichment without providing Opportunity to Hearing: Delhi HC Remands Matter [Read Order]")
Remote possibility of goods being found prohibited or restricted at time of adjudication, cannot be subjected to non release u/s 110A of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that the goods even if there is remote possibility of being found prohibited or restricted at time of...
![Remote possibility of goods being found prohibited or restricted at time of adjudication, cannot be subjected to non release u/s 110A of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Remote-possibility-of-goods-adjudication-Customs-Act-CESTAT-Remote-possibility-of-goods-being-found-prohibited-or-restricted-at-time-of-adjudication-taxscan.jpg "Remote possibility of goods being found prohibited or restricted at time of adjudication, cannot be subjected to non release u/s 110A of Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Cross examination not necessary when Statements of Officers are not going to be Relied: Madras HC upholds order of Principal Commissioner of Customs [Read Order]
The Madras High Court upheld the order of Principal Commissioner of Customs and observed that since the respondent is not at all going to rely upon the statements of the said officers, there is no...
![Cross examination not necessary when Statements of Officers are not going to be Relied: Madras HC upholds order of Principal Commissioner of Customs [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Madras-High-Court-Principal-Commissioner-of-Customs-Customs-regulations-Customs-officer-cross-examination-Customs-enforcement-Customs-taxscan.jpg "Cross examination not necessary when Statements of Officers are not going to be Relied: Madras HC upholds order of Principal Commissioner of Customs [Read Order]")