![Non-Production of BRCs cannot be used for Rejecting GST Refund Claim when details available with Dept: Karnataka HC allows Refund [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/02/500x300_2109634-rejecting-gst-refund-claim-karnataka-hc-allows-refund-taxscan.webp "Non-Production of BRCs cannot be used for Rejecting GST Refund Claim when details available with Dept: Karnataka HC allows Refund [Read Order]")
Non-Production of BRCs cannot be used for Rejecting GST Refund Claim when details available with Dept: Karnataka HC allows Refund [Read Order]
The Karnataka High Court has set aside the rejection of a GST refund claim relating to export of services, holding that the authorities had...
![VAT ITC Refund Cannot Be Claimed without TRAN-1 Post-GST: Allahabad HC Holds Refund on Capital Goods [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/01/250x150_2109182-allahabad-high-court-capital-goods-taxscan.webp "VAT ITC Refund Cannot Be Claimed without TRAN-1 Post-GST: Allahabad HC Holds Refund on Capital Goods [Read Order]")
![Goods Never Cleared for Home Consumption: Bombay HC Orders Refund of ₹35.37 Lakh Customs Duty u/s 23 to Importer [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/27/250x150_2108367-goods-never-cleared-home-consumption-bombay-hc-orders-refund-customs-duty-us-23-importer-taxscan.webp "Goods Never Cleared for Home Consumption: Bombay HC Orders Refund of ₹35.37 Lakh Customs Duty u/s 23 to Importer [Read Order]")
![Dam and Powerhouse Construction Not Taxable: CESTAT Directs Refund to Be Processed u/s 11B [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/21/250x150_2107207-dam-powerhouse-construction-cestat-refund-taxscan.webp "Dam and Powerhouse Construction Not Taxable: CESTAT Directs Refund to Be Processed u/s 11B [Read Order]")
![Refund Withholding Illegal: Calcutta HC holds No Tax Recovery Permissible Without Specific Charging Provision [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/19/250x150_2106718-calcutta-hc-refund-refund-withholding-illegal-taxscan.webp "Refund Withholding Illegal: Calcutta HC holds No Tax Recovery Permissible Without Specific Charging Provision [Read Order]")
Refund Order Based on Omitted Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules Prima Facie Invalid: Calcutta HC Stays ₹1.96 Cr GST Demand [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court, in a recent case, has stayed a ₹1.96 crore refund recovery order passed under Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, 2017, after noting that the provision was omitted from the...
![Refund Order Based on Omitted Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules Prima Facie Invalid: Calcutta HC Stays ₹1.96 Cr GST Demand [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/03/500x300_2102045-refund-order-based-omitted-rule-9610-cgst-rules-prima-facie-invalid-calcutta-hc-gst-demand-txn.webp "Refund Order Based on Omitted Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules Prima Facie Invalid: Calcutta HC Stays ₹1.96 Cr GST Demand [Read Order]")
Unutilized Goods Not Defective: Punjab & Haryana HC Dismisses SEZ Developer's Plea, Upholds Duty Refund Under Rule 25 [Read Order]
The Punjab & Haryana High Court, in its ruling, dismissed a writ petition filed by an SEZ developer, upholding the demand for a refund of customs duty exemptions on unutilized goods. The Court...
![Unutilized Goods Not Defective: Punjab & Haryana HC Dismisses SEZ Developers Plea, Upholds Duty Refund Under Rule 25 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/12/500x300_2095864-unutilized-goods-defective-punjab-haryana-hc-sez-developers-duty-refund-rule-25-taxscan.webp "Unutilized Goods Not Defective: Punjab & Haryana HC Dismisses SEZ Developers Plea, Upholds Duty Refund Under Rule 25 [Read Order]")
![No AIFTA Benefit Without Valid Certificate: Madras HC Sets Aside CESTAT Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/07/500x300_2094505-india-asean-fta-taxscan.webp "No AIFTA Benefit Without Valid Certificate: Madras HC Sets Aside CESTAT Order [Read Order]")
Refund Cannot Be Denied for Lack of BRC/FIRC: CESTAT Sets Aside Rejection in Service Tax Case [Read Order]
The bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and allowed the refund claim of accumulated Cenvat Credit...
![Refund Cannot Be Denied for Lack of BRC/FIRC: CESTAT Sets Aside Rejection in Service Tax Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/01/500x300_2093057-cestat-service-tax-service-tax-case-rejection-in-service-tax-case-taxscan.webp "Refund Cannot Be Denied for Lack of BRC/FIRC: CESTAT Sets Aside Rejection in Service Tax Case [Read Order]")
Relief to SBI, Refund u/s 11B of Excise Act can be Claimed within One Year from Date of Payment: Karnataka HC [Read Order]
The High Court of Karnataka in ruling in favour of SBI has held that the refund under section 11B of Excise Act can be claimed within one year from date of payment. The respondent-revenue is...
![Relief to SBI, Refund u/s 11B of Excise Act can be Claimed within One Year from Date of Payment: Karnataka HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/24/500x300_2090510-2062340-cestat-service-tax-demand-sbi-taxscan.webp "Relief to SBI, Refund u/s 11B of Excise Act can be Claimed within One Year from Date of Payment: Karnataka HC [Read Order]")