Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Interest on delayed Refund payable u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act when the Double benefit of the Same amount not exists: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Interest-Refund-Interest-on-delayed-Refund-Central-Excise-Act-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Interest on delayed Refund payable u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act when the Double benefit of the Same amount not exists: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Interest on delayed Refund payable u/s 11BB of Central Excise Act when the Double benefit of the Same amount not exists: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that interest on delayed refund payable u/s 11BB of...
![CBIC Circular Clarifying GST Exemption on Notice Pay received from Employee Applies Retrospectively: Kerala HC Allows Refund [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Refund-Kerala-High-Court-CBIC-CBIC-Circular-GST-Exemption-GST-Notice-GST-Exemption-on-Notice-Pay-Taxscan.jpg "CBIC Circular Clarifying GST Exemption on Notice Pay received from Employee Applies Retrospectively: Kerala HC Allows Refund [Read Order]")
![CENVAT Credit Refund cant deny for Judicial Scrutiny: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/CENVAT-Credit-Refund-cant-deny-for-Judicial-Scrutiny-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "CENVAT Credit Refund cant deny for Judicial Scrutiny: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Rejection of Refund of amount paid through DEPB Scrip is not valid in Absence of Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Refund-DEPB-Scrip-Absence-of-Evidence-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Rejection of Refund of amount paid through DEPB Scrip is not valid in Absence of Evidence: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Review of GST Orders Including Refund Order: Haryana Issues Instructions [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GST-Orders-GST-Refund-Order-Refund-taxscan.jpg "Review of GST Orders Including Refund Order: Haryana Issues Instructions [Read Order]")
![Refund admissible on Trenching Pipeline installed partly in SEZ partly outside: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Refund-Refund-on-trenching-pipeline-trenching-pipeline-SEZ-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Refund admissible on Trenching Pipeline installed partly in SEZ partly outside: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Bombay HC directs to Refund of amounts paid during the Course of the Investigation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Bombay-HC-Refund-Investigation-taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC directs to Refund of amounts paid during the Course of the Investigation [Read Order]")
State being an 'Agent' for Collection of CST, cannot Refuse Refund of Excess Tax Paid by Purchasing Dealer: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
In a major relief to Tata Steel, the Calcutta High Court has allowed a plea seeking to grant of refund of excess CST paid as a purchasing dealer. The petitioner, M/s Tata Steel is a registered...
![State being an Agent for Collection of CST, cannot Refuse Refund of Excess Tax Paid by Purchasing Dealer: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Agent-Collection-of-CST-CST-Refund-Refund-of-Excess-Tax-Excess-Tax-Tax-Calcutta-HC-taxscan.jpg "State being an Agent for Collection of CST, cannot Refuse Refund of Excess Tax Paid by Purchasing Dealer: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
![Refund by FFI and No Receipt of Services: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Refund-FFI-Receipt-of-Services-CESTAT-Service-Tax-Demand-taxscan.jpg "Refund by FFI and No Receipt of Services: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![Reversing Credit under protest: CESTAT upholds Refund claim [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Reversing-Credit-CESTAT-Refund-claim-taxscan.jpg "Reversing Credit under protest: CESTAT upholds Refund claim [Read Order]")
Refund Claim is hit by bar of Unjust enrichment When no documents are produced to prove incidence of Duty not passed to Buyers: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), Chennai Bench held that refund claim is hit by bar of unjust enrichment when no documents are produced to prove incidence of duty...
![Refund Claim is hit by bar of Unjust enrichment When no documents are produced to prove incidence of Duty not passed to Buyers: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Refund-Claim-documents-Buyers-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Refund Claim is hit by bar of Unjust enrichment When no documents are produced to prove incidence of Duty not passed to Buyers: CESTAT [Read Order]")