![No Claim of Refund When Appeal has already been Abated: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Claim-Refund-Appeal-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Claim of Refund When Appeal has already been Abated: CESTAT [Read Order]")
No Claim of Refund When Appeal has already been Abated: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), held that no claim of refund can be allowed when appeal has...
![Refund not sanctioned within the stipulated time period of 3 Months from Date of Refund Application: CESTAT grants Relief to Reliance Industries [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Refund-Refund-Application-CESTAT-Reliance-Industries-taxscan.jpg "Refund not sanctioned within the stipulated time period of 3 Months from Date of Refund Application: CESTAT grants Relief to Reliance Industries [Read Order]")
![Withholding of Refund of Rs. 54 Crores by Income Tax Dept: Delhi HC directs to Process Refund to KRBL with Interest [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Income-Tax-Dept-Delhi-HC-Refund-KRBL-Interest-taxscan.jpg "Withholding of Refund of Rs. 54 Crores by Income Tax Dept: Delhi HC directs to Process Refund to KRBL with Interest [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC directs Income Tax Dept to pay Refund of Rs. 34 Crore along with Interest to KRBL within 6 Weeks [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Delhi-HC-Income-Tax-Dept-pay-Refund-Interest-KRBL-TAXSCAN.jpg "Delhi HC directs Income Tax Dept to pay Refund of Rs. 34 Crore along with Interest to KRBL within 6 Weeks [Read Order]")
![Excise duty Refund are Purely Capital Receipts, not Chargeable to Tax: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Excise-duty-Refund-Capital-Receipts-Tax-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Excise duty Refund are Purely Capital Receipts, not Chargeable to Tax: ITAT [Read Order]")
Refund of GST on Exports made as Zero-Rated Supply: Allahabad HC to examine vires of Rule 96(10)(b) of CGST Rules [Read Order]
The Allahabad High Court Division Bench of Justice Sunita Agarwal and Justice Vipin Chandra Dixit is to examine whether the Rule 96(10)(b) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 is...
![Refund of GST on Exports made as Zero-Rated Supply: Allahabad HC to examine vires of Rule 96(10)(b) of CGST Rules [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Refund-GST-Exports-Supply-Allahabad-HC-CGST-Rules-taxscan.jpg "Refund of GST on Exports made as Zero-Rated Supply: Allahabad HC to examine vires of Rule 96(10)(b) of CGST Rules [Read Order]")
Non-Implementation of Order passed in May granting Refund is ‘Strange’ and Loss to Exchequer: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court in an interim order held that the action of the Revenue delaying the implementation of refund order passed in the month of May is “strange” and the same is causing loss to the...
![Non-Implementation of Order passed in May granting Refund is ‘Strange’ and Loss to Exchequer: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Non-Implementation-Refund-Strange-Delhi-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-Implementation of Order passed in May granting Refund is ‘Strange’ and Loss to Exchequer: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
Sleeping over Rights for nearly Ten years, cannot take shelter under Law: CESTAT rejects Refund claim [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench rejected claim for refund and held that sleeping over rights for nearly ten years, cannot take shelter under law. The...
![Sleeping over Rights for nearly Ten years, cannot take shelter under Law: CESTAT rejects Refund claim [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CESTAT-refund-claim-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Sleeping over Rights for nearly Ten years, cannot take shelter under Law: CESTAT rejects Refund claim [Read Order]")
CBIC Rescinds Notification Extending Due Date for Filing of Application for GST Refund u/s 55 by Notified Agencies [Read Notification]
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has rescinded the notification extending the due date for filing of the application for GST Refund under section 55 by notified agencies. A...
![CBIC Rescinds Notification Extending Due Date for Filing of Application for GST Refund u/s 55 by Notified Agencies [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/CBIC-Notification-Refund-Agencies-taxscan.jpeg "CBIC Rescinds Notification Extending Due Date for Filing of Application for GST Refund u/s 55 by Notified Agencies [Read Notification]")
Duty remission u/s 23 applicable only on Imported Goods, Claim of Refund not sustainable: CESTAT [Read Order]
The single-member bench of the Hyderabad Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the duty remission under section is applicable only on imported goods and since...
![Duty remission u/s 23 applicable only on Imported Goods, Claim of Refund not sustainable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Duty-remission-imported-goods-refund-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "Duty remission u/s 23 applicable only on Imported Goods, Claim of Refund not sustainable: CESTAT [Read Order]")
CESS on Paper not a Duty of Excise, Refund rejection on Limitation u/s 11B does not sustain: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Single Member Bench of Kolkata Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that cess on paper is not a duty of excise and refund rejected on limitation under section...
![CESS on Paper not a Duty of Excise, Refund rejection on Limitation u/s 11B does not sustain: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Cess-duty-of-Excise-Refund-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "CESS on Paper not a Duty of Excise, Refund rejection on Limitation u/s 11B does not sustain: CESTAT [Read Order]")