![Non-Filing of ITR on Bonafide Belief of Exemption u/s 80P of Income Tax Act: Kerala HC directs to File ITR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Non-Filing-ITR-on-Bonafide-Belief-Exemption-Income-Tax-Act-Kerala-HC-directs-File-ITR-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-Filing of ITR on Bonafide Belief of Exemption u/s 80P of Income Tax Act: Kerala HC directs to File ITR [Read Order]")
Non-Filing of ITR on Bonafide Belief of Exemption u/s 80P of Income Tax Act: Kerala HC directs to File ITR [Read Order]
The Kerala High Court directed to Income Tax Returns (ITR) as there was non-filing of the income tax returns on bonafide belief of the exemption...
![No Additions shall be made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act on Unsecured Loans if Assessee furnishes Proper Evidences: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Additions-No-Additions-Income-Tax-Act-Unsecured-Loans-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "No Additions shall be made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act on Unsecured Loans if Assessee furnishes Proper Evidences: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Interest u/s 24(b) of Income Tax Act allowable when Charging for Income Receivable and Income is Approved: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Interest-Income-Tax-Act-Charging-Income-Receivable-Income-Approved-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Interest u/s 24(b) of Income Tax Act allowable when Charging for Income Receivable and Income is Approved: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Different View taken by AAR cannot be Sufficient Basis for Income Tax Officer to Believe Escapement of Income: Bombay HC quashes Assessment Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/AAR-Income-Tax-Officer-Income-Tax-Income-Assessment-Notice-Assessment-Notice-Different-View-taken-by-AAR-Bombay-HC-quashes-Assessment-Notice-Taxscan.jpg "Different View taken by AAR cannot be Sufficient Basis for Income Tax Officer to Believe Escapement of Income: Bombay HC quashes Assessment Notice [Read Order]")
Re-assessment u/s 147 of Income Tax Act After Expiry of Four years from End of Relevant Year of Assessment is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act,1961 after the expiry of four years from the end of the...
![Re-assessment u/s 147 of Income Tax Act After Expiry of Four years from End of Relevant Year of Assessment is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Re-assessment-Income-Tax-Act-After-Expiry-of-Four-years-from-End-of-Relevant-Year-of-Assessment-is-Invalid-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Re-assessment u/s 147 of Income Tax Act After Expiry of Four years from End of Relevant Year of Assessment is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]")
Assessment Order cannot Target Sole Legal Heir of Deceased Assessee Alone: Delhi HC sets aside Rs. 10 Crores Demand [Read Order]
In a recent judgment the Delhi High Court observed that an assessment order cannot target sole legal heir of deceased assessee, thereby setting aside a demand of Rupees 10 crores. The writ...
![Assessment Order cannot Target Sole Legal Heir of Deceased Assessee Alone: Delhi HC sets aside Rs. 10 Crores Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Assessment-Order-cannot-Target-Sole-Legal-Heir-of-Deceased-Assessee-Alone-Delhi-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Assessment Order cannot Target Sole Legal Heir of Deceased Assessee Alone: Delhi HC sets aside Rs. 10 Crores Demand [Read Order]")
Mere Citing of Different PAN by Assessee and Assessing Officer Cannot be Ground for Dismissal of Appeal: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that mere citing of different Permanent Account Number (PAN) by the assessee and assessee officer could not be a ground for dismissal...
![Mere Citing of Different PAN by Assessee and Assessing Officer Cannot be Ground for Dismissal of Appeal: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Mere-Citing-Different-PAN-Assessee-Assessing-Officer-Ground-Dismissal-Appeal-ITAT.jpg "Mere Citing of Different PAN by Assessee and Assessing Officer Cannot be Ground for Dismissal of Appeal: ITAT [Read Order]")
Issuance of Notice and Initiation of Reassessment Beyond Six Years is Barred by limitation: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Calcutta High Court held that issuance of notice and initiation of reassessment beyond six years is barred by limitation. Coplama Products Private Limited, the petitioner has...
Onus is on AO to provide Reasons to Disbelieve Bank Statements and Supporting Documents for Reopening Assessment: Bombay HC [Read Order]
In a recent decision the Bombay High Court ruled that is the onus of the Assessing Officer (AO) to provide reasons to disbelieve bank statements and supporting documents for reopening assessment. ...
![Co-owner Showing Different Capital Gains Amount not a Ground to Reopen Assessment: Gujarat HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Co-owner-Showing-Different-Capital-Gains-Amount-Reopen-Assessment-Gujarat-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Co-owner Showing Different Capital Gains Amount not a Ground to Reopen Assessment: Gujarat HC [Read Order]")
